Bored 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Considering the crackdown on steroids and specifically the BALCO labs didn't happen till the fall of 2003 I don't see how Giambi's drop in production the previous two season would have anything to do with him using or not using steroids. And this is coming from someone who does believe Giambi along with Bonds and Sheffield were supplied steroids by BALCO. Actually I heard the real cover up is he has 23 dead hookers in his basement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kahran Ramsus 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I orginally thought it was just an excuse, but it really appears to have gone beyond that now. If there is a real parasite going around then Kevin Brown getting it would make sense since he's as brittle as Mr. Burns. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Bad Brad Jacobs Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I dont know. It just seems like it doesn't all add up. Sure, he probably has some parasite..but how do you explain the declines in the previous years? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I dont know. It just seems like it doesn't all add up. Sure, he probably has some parasite..but how do you explain the declines in the previous years? 2002 isn't some hideous drop. 2003 he had eye and knee problems. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Precious Roy 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Let's be real here, last year was the first season where he showed a significant decline. In 2002 he still hit .300 w/ 40 hrs, the slight drop in overall performance can be attributed to the change in ballpark/team/city. 2003 is where the decline really starts, dropping down to .250. Sure, he still got a lot of walks and hit 40 homers, but I watched the guy, he wasn't the same guy who had hit .340, it was basically all or nothing with him last year. That was chalked up to his balky knee and a problem with his eyesight. This year the knee is healthy and the eyesight problem was fixed, but now he's dropped all that steroid weight and he's got the parasite issue. Basically I chalk the root of his problems up to steroids, but I think much of it is mental at this point as well, and who the hell knows with the damn parasites, but if he can't recover from them there's obviously something wrong with his body. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 I dont know. It just seems like it doesn't all add up. Sure, he probably has some parasite..but how do you explain the declines in the previous years? Here's an odd stat I pulled up...... Year Age 2000 29 2001 30 2002 31 2003 32 2004 33 Interesting how his age increases every year. And again, if you go to Jason Giambi's player page at baseball-reference.com, scroll down and look at his Similar Batters Through Age 32. Hal Trosky, Mo Vaughn, Ted Kluszewski, and Wally Berger all had similar stats at Giambi's age, and all were essentially finished by their early to mid-30s. Giambi's decline, sudden as it is, is not an unprecidented phenominon. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Staravenger Report post Posted July 29, 2004 This thread just added about 3 people to my "Complete idiots" list. Next everyone will say that Barry Bonds can naturally hit 70+ home runs a year and hasn't used steroids once in his life. Last year: Giambi was injured. Injured players don't normally bat .356 and hit 9000 home runs. I can't believe people don't understand that. It's like asking a basketball player with a broken ankle to try and score 35 pts. a game and playing for 40 minutes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Art Sandusky 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 28-32 is Prime. Afterwards, you decline. Do you accept this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Prime ends at 30, actually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Bad Brad Jacobs Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Then I guess you would say that reason many current 35+ players are doing very well is because they are in great shape. You would probably be right. For every Mo Vaughn (a guy who was never in great physical condition) there is a Steve Finley or a Tony Womack or a Vinny Castilla who played at least consistantly decent baseball well past the age of 32 or 33. When everyone can generally agree that players are in better shape now than they ever have been, it's hard to explain why somebody like Giambi is declining so fast as a player when everyone else his age is either slowly going downhill or even improving. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Then I guess you would say that reason many current 35+ players are doing very well is because they are in great shape. You would probably be right. For every Mo Vaughn (a guy who was never in great physical condition) there is a Steve Finley or a Tony Womack or a Vinny Castilla who played at least consistantly decent baseball well past the age of 32 or 33. When everyone can generally agree that players are in better shape now than they ever have been, it's hard to explain why somebody like Giambi is declining so fast as a player when everyone else his age is either slowly going downhill or even improving. Okay, this is all steroid withdrawal and the parasite is fake. Explain Kevin Brown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Bad Brad Jacobs Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Kevin Brown was on steroids too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Kevin Brown was on steroids too. But of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nelly's Bandaid Report post Posted July 29, 2004 OR, he's faking too, only to cover up that his back went out. Steroids make more sense, but still. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 29, 2004 OR, he's faking too, only to cover up that his back went out. That would be kind of a crappy cover up, considering that we heard his back went out about a week before the parasite showed up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Nelly's Bandaid Report post Posted July 29, 2004 Exactly! It must be true.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted July 30, 2004 Then I guess you would say that reason many current 35+ players are doing very well is because they are in great shape. You would probably be right. For every Mo Vaughn (a guy who was never in great physical condition) there is a Steve Finley or a Tony Womack or a Vinny Castilla who played at least consistantly decent baseball well past the age of 32 or 33. When everyone can generally agree that players are in better shape now than they ever have been, it's hard to explain why somebody like Giambi is declining so fast as a player when everyone else his age is either slowly going downhill or even improving. The vast majority of players are out of baseball by their mid to late 30s. You usually only see good players in their 30s because they wouldn't be around otherwise. Even Castilla, Finley, and Womack are not BETTER than they were in their 20s. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasonX 0 Report post Posted July 30, 2004 Last year the excuse was that he had trouble adjusting to NY. This year its parasites. What's it gonna be next year? I miss my brother and will only play better if Jeremy is a Yankee too so I can be with him all of the time while playing.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JasonX 0 Report post Posted July 30, 2004 Tying Brown into the possible parasite scam: Brown does indeed have a parasite and that someone (say Giambi or his doctors) came across the notion that they can play the "parasite" card too and claim that Giambi has the same health problem as Brown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 30, 2004 Tying Brown into the possible parasite scam: Brown does indeed have a parasite and that someone (say Giambi or his doctors) came across the notion that they can play the "parasite" card too and claim that Giambi has the same health problem as Brown. They found Brown's parasite a full week after Giambi's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Bad Brad Jacobs Report post Posted July 30, 2004 You've got a point. I could see someone sitting in a meeting in NY coming up with that one. (JasonX I mean) And BTW....sometimes people sit on information for a while until they either leak it themselves or someone else finds out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites