Guest Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 Alright, the feud was boring before. Now it's just STUPID. A hair vs. hair match? It's not fucking 1987. And it's KURT ANGLE, who should be main-eventing. He has more heat then all of the other main-event level "heels".
Guest Hogan Made Wrestling Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 "He has more heat then all of the other main-event level "heels"." Right now, Jericho is the only main event level heel on Smackdown, and Angle doesn't get that much more heat than he does. More yes, but not overwhelmingly so. And as far as I'm concerned, the feud is pretty much a main event. It always gets tons of mic and match time on Smackdown, and the only other feud going on there is the HHH-Hogan-Jericho stuff.
Guest goodhelmet Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 I never thought I'd say this but I agree with Hogan Made Wrestling. The Angle-Edge feud is solid and is getting a hell of alot more time than any other feud on Smackdown. Plus, if they're putting on **** matches, who gives a shit if they are having hair matches or viagra on a pole matches or whatever.
Guest Hogan Made Wrestling Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 The only really dumb thing about the hair stip is that it practically gives away that Angle's losing, although one would have probably expected that to begin with.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 Well, this feud was REALLY bad, and now a hair stip makes it pathetic. Three weeks of Angle trying to or succeeding in cutting jobber hair while Edge tried to stop him. Does No one remember X-Pac/Jarrett?
Guest goodhelmet Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 Who friggin cares??? If the match is good, it's the only thing I care about right now. I know I'm not the only one who's concerned about the lack of great matches. If Edge-Angle means another **** match then fuckin A! AND I'm not so sure Edge wins this thing. A haircut might be the one thing to seperate him from the rest of the 80's glam rockers in the WWF.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 3, 2002 Report Posted May 3, 2002 So once again, I go back to my argument. Because Angle is the only one with any credability that can DRAG a good match out of Edge, he is stuffed into some REALLY boring midcard hair vs. hair storyline that has two jobbers playing seconds? I don't understand this "Punish him for doing something right" plan thay are applying to Angle right now.
Guest One Bad Apple Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 The offical screw the edge/angle feud thread Is it more official than the other twelve? So once again, I go back to my argument. I could understand doing that if it actually made sense to begin with.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 X-Pac/Jarrett was a good match. Also, Storm got a good match out of Edge before and Adam also had a good match with Test(GASP!), so stop your bitching already. It's not as if they are going to fighting over pinky shears on a pole or soemthing else that's equally lame.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 I said Credability. Storm has none now. (My point was that they were looking for someone with cred to get a good match out pf Edge and elevate him now) and I didn't care for Test/Edge It's not as if they are going to fighting over pinky shears on a pole or soemthing else that's equally lame. T-shirts and hair rank up there.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 NOTHING is as bad as an "object on a pole" match, maybe, JUST MAYBE, the Coal Miner's Glove match from Havoc 92.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 Not so coincidentally, look who was in the last WWF "item on a pole" PPV match
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 Not so coincidentally, look who was in the last WWF "item on a pole" PPV match Yeah, and Edge was up against Regal who hasn't had a good match in 2 years, so what's your point? I blame both guys for that feud failing to begin with.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 I was just bringing up part of Edge's history of excruciatingly brutal feuds.
Guest goodhelmet Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 His point is he's not happy Angle is fighting Edge instead of Hogan, where Angle would carry the blame for the ratings drop which gives him one less thing to bich about.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 Ok, right now in this Edge feud, Angle is in jobber tag matches. If he was in the main event and the ratings failed, he would be depushed into jobber tag matches. But if he went into the main event and the reatings DIDN'T fail, Lucifer may not have Queen of the Damned demote him. I'd go with the gamble rather than the definite shit.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 I was just bringing up part of Edge's history of excruciatingly brutal feuds. Well, the Regal/Edge feud was just one. I haven't seen another feud of his that was even REMOTELY that bad. And hell, Angle jobbing in main event tag matches against Hunter and Hogan would be better then putting on good tag matches with Val, Storm, and Edge? I keep forgetting how obsessed you are over this stuff.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 Argh.. that didn't come out right...lemme correct it: I would love nothing more than to see both Angle and Jericho main eventing right now, but given how terrible Hunter and Hogan have been since their respective returns, I'd rather not see either of them catch any flak for the dropping ratings(like Jericho may even up getting since he main evented against the Orange Goblin) and end up REALLY getting de-pushed, a la Jericho last year after KOTR. Hell, I'm sure that Vince hasn't COMPLETELY lost his mind yet(I hope) and will hopefully have either Chris or Kurt end Hogan's career for good on a major PPV(SummerSlam, perhaps?) to get them over that final hurdle and acknowledge them as TRUE main eventers.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 I haven't seen another feud of his that was even REMOTELY that bad. Christian. They blew a sure thing. All they had to do was keep Edge serious. But the damned Bed wetting jokes had to start and it became a stupid assed comedy feud with no emotion. And hell, Angle jobbing in main event tag matches against Hunter and Hogan would be better then putting on good tag matches with Val, Storm, and Edge? If they make it seem that Angle needs a distracted referee and Lance Storm interference to beat VAL VENIS, then yes, losing to Hogan would be better.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 Argh.. that didn't come out right...lemme correct it: I would love nothing more than to see both Angle and Jericho main eventing right now, but given how terrible Hunter and Hogan have been since their respective returns, I'd rather not see either of them catch any flak for the dropping ratings(like Jericho may even up getting since he main evented against the Orange Goblin) and end up REALLY getting de-pushed, a la Jericho last year after KOTR. Hell, I'm sure that Vince hasn't COMPLETELY lost his mind yet(I hope) and will hopefully have either Chris or Kurt end Hogan's career for good on a major PPV(SummerSlam, perhaps?) to get them over that final hurdle and acknowledge them as TRUE main eventers. Yeah, I see your point, but they are still making Angle look REAL bad.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 Christian. They blew a sure thing. All they had to do was keep Edge serious. But the damned Bed wetting jokes had to start and it became a stupid assed comedy feud with no emotion. I always felt that throwing Christian in the Alliance is what killed that feud. It was going pretty good before Christian became "just another Alliance member". If they make it seem that Angle needs a distracted referee and Lance Storm interference to beat VAL VENIS, then yes, losing to Hogan would be better. I know where you're coming from, but they would just play him like they did Jericho on Smackdown and make him like a fucking idiot. But still, he really shouldn't need help to beat Val though...
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 I always felt that throwing Christian in the Alliance is what killed that feud. It was going pretty good before Christian became "just another Alliance member". I thought the feud was dead and that was a last ditch effort to save it (Which failed) I know where you're coming from, but they would just play him like they did Jericho on Smackdown and make him like a fucking idiot. But still, he really shouldn't need help to beat Val though... There should be some kind of middle ground there.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 I thought the feud was dead and that was a last ditch effort to save it (Which failed) Good point, but the Alliance thing was probably the nail in the coffin considering that Edge wasn't that over at the time and Christian was practically heatless going into No Mercy as the IC champ. I just wish that the writers had insisted on Edge coming back as a serious-as-death, I-want-revenge guy instead of the grinning idiot who wore black leather and speared everything in sight.
Guest Anglesault Posted May 4, 2002 Report Posted May 4, 2002 . I just wish that the writers had insisted on Edge coming back as a serious-as-death, I-want-revenge guy instead of the grinning idiot who wore black leather and speared everything in sight. That was my point exactly.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now