Guest The Shadow Behind You Posted November 12, 2004 Report Posted November 12, 2004 Yeah but they CAN'T ever have #30 actually win the Rumble. It renders the entire hour preceding it pointless to just have the last guy win as he should. There might be riots over it, heh. What's up with this Booker/Bradshaw thing? I mean they can't seriously think Bradshaw can hold the title too awful much longer. I thought that the main idea was to job him out to Booker and use Book as a transition guy to Angle or whoever. And incidentally, how does Bradshaw have this kind of backstage power to the point where he can refuse to job? I mean he's FUCKING BRADSHAW. Someone winning at #30 wouldn't be any different then Brock winning from #29. Brock lasted a total of 8 minutes in the ring. Maybe if they have #30 in a longer final segement, it won't be as poorly recepted.
Guest Shutterspeed Posted November 12, 2004 Report Posted November 12, 2004 I doubt the likelihood of a mark crowd instigating a riot over a logic flaw.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now