Guest CronoT Report post Posted November 20, 2004 http://www.cmgsccc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6267 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Shutterspeed Report post Posted November 20, 2004 Probably would've been better off without this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted November 20, 2004 The ton of bricks. Cause the ton of feathers would fly away with a strong breeze. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CronoT Report post Posted November 20, 2004 The ton of bricks. Cause the ton of feathers would fly away with a strong breeze. And now the "virus" has spread here. My job is complete. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted November 20, 2004 Nah, just got bored. A ton is a ton, just saying logically the ton of feathers would fly away since you'd need a pretty big fucking box to hold a ton of feathers. So the box would add additional weight. The ton of bricks would just be on a pallet. Therefore, if you put the feathers in a giant box, then they would weigh more. Cause without the box, they float away. SEE! It's logical! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Danny Dubya v 2.0 Report post Posted November 20, 2004 Yes. It'd be perfectly logical if the question wasn't extremely simple and straightforward with no extra stipulations whatsoever. A better question would've been which ton of unscattered material would have the most density. Nearly everyone would thoughtlessly claim that brick is denser than compacted feathers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
