Guest CronoT Posted November 20, 2004 Report Posted November 20, 2004 http://www.cmgsccc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6267
Guest Shutterspeed Posted November 20, 2004 Report Posted November 20, 2004 Probably would've been better off without this thread.
2GOLD Posted November 20, 2004 Report Posted November 20, 2004 The ton of bricks. Cause the ton of feathers would fly away with a strong breeze.
Guest CronoT Posted November 20, 2004 Report Posted November 20, 2004 The ton of bricks. Cause the ton of feathers would fly away with a strong breeze. And now the "virus" has spread here. My job is complete.
2GOLD Posted November 20, 2004 Report Posted November 20, 2004 Nah, just got bored. A ton is a ton, just saying logically the ton of feathers would fly away since you'd need a pretty big fucking box to hold a ton of feathers. So the box would add additional weight. The ton of bricks would just be on a pallet. Therefore, if you put the feathers in a giant box, then they would weigh more. Cause without the box, they float away. SEE! It's logical!
Guest Danny Dubya v 2.0 Posted November 20, 2004 Report Posted November 20, 2004 Yes. It'd be perfectly logical if the question wasn't extremely simple and straightforward with no extra stipulations whatsoever. A better question would've been which ton of unscattered material would have the most density. Nearly everyone would thoughtlessly claim that brick is denser than compacted feathers.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now