Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest Duncan Eternia
Posted
Kane deserved more than just a 1-day championship reign.

 

Foley should have had at least a significant reign. He held it 3 times, but all for less than a month, and the third time was only for a day also.

 

RVD should've won the title when he was mega over.

Totally agree with Kane. He's a big man that doesn't totally suck in the ring. Plus he has proven himself loyal to management. Look at all the crap he has been booked in, and he still remains quasi-over. Fake Diesel, Issac Yankem, 1-Day reign, jobbed to Taker how many times, Necrophelia, etc.

 

WWE usually "rewards" guys that do what they are told. Of course, creative proabaly thought the Katie Vick angle was a reward!

 

Foley...I think WWE should have kept the belt on him heading into WM and have had a three-way with him, Rock, and Austin. I think that's what was scheduled at one time.

 

RVD...At first I was against RVD getting the title when he first got mega-over in the Invasion. But the more I think about it now, he really should have gotten a run. It would have freshened things up a bit and breathed a new life into that botched angle.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...