Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Contrary to the lackluster reviews Smackdown has been getting lately, I must say that I MUCH prefer SD to Raw. The matches are longer the in-ring talent is better, you have at least 4 main event guys to carry the show, and even the Undisputed Title (Jericho, Angle, HHH, Rock <when he's around>) You got "almost there" back-up main eventers to push in case of injury, drunkeness or termination of main eventers (Edge,Benoit,DDP, etc) And I actually dig the storylines. Raw, on the other hand..is a mess right now. The matches are shorter, which I don't understand at all with guys like RVD, D'lo, Lesnar, and Guerrero in the mix. It seems like Raw has some really good tools to revitalize their main event scene..but they keep coming up short for whatever reason (see also: NWO). I can't say much for the storylines...All i can say is, Smackdown makes sense to me, Raw does not. When Raw is over, i'm always sorely dissapointed and frustrated. Does anybody out there understand what I'm feeling? Share with me your thoughts on why I"m feeling like this..shouldn't it be the same if the same set of bookers are booking both shows? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest JHawk Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Raw, on the other hand..is a mess right now. The matches are shorter, which I don't understand at all with guys like RVD, D'lo, Lesnar, and Guerrero in the mix. Have we been watching the same show? UPN, 8pm Thursdays? Because that matches on SmackDown (aside from the main) rarely reach the 3 minute mark. They're a more action packed 3 minutes, yes, but it's still under 3 minutes. A three way cruiserweight title match didn't make it to the 2:30 mark. Still, SmackDown was the better show...this week. Usually I'm more entertained by Raw though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Your Olympic Hero Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Smackdown Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 I much prefer SD, if only because it has better talent. As you said, Raw is a mess right now. It's pretty sad when a show has only one good main eventer, and even that one good wrestler is not working as he normally does because of what appears to be a lack of motivation(can we really blame him?). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 I'd have to side with Raw... Although it has been *REALLY* lacking the past few weeks, to the point where i've considered not to even bother watching. BUT...as long as Taker is on the show, it has a viewer in me! This has been the Taker Mark Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 There are only three guys left that I even care about anymore. Jericho, Angle, and Booker. I too usually look more forward to SmackDown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kinetic Report post Posted May 18, 2002 By some incredible stroke of either luck or booking ineptitude, RAW managed to be a little better than Smackdown just after the split. Since then, however, the uneven distribution of talent has become really evident. Most of the things that I take issue with in the WWE right now are part of RAW: Hogan/Undertaker, the incredibly dull Austin/Flair feud, Bradshaw's push, the nWo, etc. On a weekly basis, Smackdown comes out looking great by comparison. So, yes. Definitely Smackdown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Vanilla Midget Report post Posted May 18, 2002 i would say smackdown as well, though raw has 2 things which cause me to tune in every week: RVD and BROCK!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Smackdown, no question. They always had the better wrestlers, but ever since Backlash they even have the more focused storylines. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cobainwasmurdered Report post Posted May 18, 2002 I only watch Raw..so Raw. I started a Smackdown boycott a couple of weeks ago. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest El Satanico Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Are there any other choices? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nWoScorpion Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Whicher Hogan's on!!!1 I preffer Raw. cause i can't read its spoilers and you never know whats gonna be on (maybe somthin good like Austin winning the title again or somethin). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RetroRob215 Report post Posted May 18, 2002 I prefer Raw because it has RVD, Eddy, Brock, the women's WRESTLING division, Stone Cold, and Flair. On SmackDown!, the only people I like are the Cruisers, Randy Orton, Kurt Angle (who will be gone by December), Edge and Jericho. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 My vote goes to Smackdown, the only things on RAW that are good are Ric Flair, RVD, and Booker T. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 My vote goes for both shows being a pile of crap these days. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Raw-bad: 1.The-women's-division-is-now-weak-once-again-now-that-Jazz-is-out-for-6-months-with-an-injury. 2.The-nWo-so-called-poison. 3.Bradshaw's-main-event-push. 4.Austin/Flair/Show-feud. 5.Hogan/Taker 6.The-same-main-event-every-week. Good: 1.Brock-Lesnar-(When-he's-not-feuding-with-the-Hardyz) 2.RVD/Eddie-Guererro 3.Austin-(When-he's-not-going-up-against-the-likes-of-The-Big-Show-and-the-rest-of-the-nWo) Smackdown-bad: Hell,there's-nothing-really-wrong-with-it-besides-it-short-matches.Oh,Billy-and-Chuck. Good: 1.A-better-roster. 2.Well-thought-out-storylines. 3.Cruiserweights. 4.Good-mid-card-matches. 5.Better-main-events. 6.HHH/Jericho 7.Kurt-Angle/Edge Definetly-Smackdown. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Kahran Ramsus Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Hell,there's-nothing-really-wrong-with-it-besides-it-short-matches.Oh,Billy-and-Chuck. Vince, but he is only on for 10 minutes or so, and I can flip the channel for a bit. On RAW there is usually only one good segment (usually involving Booker T). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 18, 2002 RAW, solely because of STONE COLD!, STONE COLD!! And Booker T. Oh yeah also because I don't get Smackdown!. LOL Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest papacita Report post Posted May 18, 2002 Smackdown is on fire baby! Just like...BOOM! WHAM! KABLOOM! IT'S WIGGITY WACK, BOY-EE! I'm quite fond of it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest razazteca Report post Posted May 18, 2002 I watch Raw for Regal and I prefer a Flair promo over Vince's mid-age crisis sexploits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 19, 2002 i don't get raw, but it looks crap anyway. i really look forward to sd id love it if it wasnt for vinces pervy antics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites