Guest Anglesault Report post Posted May 20, 2002 Now, I was under the impression that Molly's Prude character was basically an over the top extention of her. (She is a virgin till marriage, she keeps herself covered) But if you look at this latest picture, it appears that she has, um, grown in the chest area. Before: After: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anorak Report post Posted May 20, 2002 I don't really see it myself, there's not much ground for your argument based on those photos. I liked Molly better as a blonde though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jobber of the Week Report post Posted May 20, 2002 If you check out pictures of her as Savage's whipping girl in WCW her outfit shows quite a bit of chest and well.... She's not Trish, but she's not flat either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest easye46 Report post Posted May 20, 2002 Nope, I can't see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 20, 2002 I actually think that she looked bigger before, not based on those two pictures, but the old Holly outfit really accentuated her. I actually marvelled out loud watching Raw a few weeks ago at how flattening her black top thing was. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Some Guy Report post Posted May 20, 2002 I think she just got a little bit fatter. She looked huge in the hips (bigger than usual) in that bathing suit on Raw. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Flyboy Report post Posted May 20, 2002 I don't see it... if anything the before picture looks bigger. Maybe you're spending too much time looking at Molly's chest, AS... (not that I blame you) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest pinnacleofallthingsmanly Report post Posted May 20, 2002 I think she looked better blonde too, or maybe it was just the curly hair I liked. It could be her new make-up, but I think she looked better before. BTW, her chest doesn't look any bigger in the new picture. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 20, 2002 I don't see any difference. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest papacita Report post Posted May 20, 2002 The original pic looks bigger, just that her top is tight. The 2nd one, her top is kinda loose, making them stand out more. And she looks better now! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CED Ordonez Report post Posted May 20, 2002 The pictures aren't as incriminating as the Steph before and after pics, so I'll go with the majority that it's just the top making AS see things. But he did put those pics of Molly and her top up so all is forgiven. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Tha Cunnysmythe Report post Posted May 20, 2002 They're probably right, it's just the top. But I was convinced they were fake for a while... God, I'd hate that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest deadbeater Report post Posted July 19, 2002 sorry to bump (no, I'm not sorry for bumping a Molly thread, so there!!) But I've seen Molly's photos when she was young and in gymnastics competition. She had a very healthy set of lungs then. Unfortunately, they were too healthy for the anorexic world of world-class gymnastics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest art_vandelay Report post Posted July 19, 2002 It's all about the bra, those things are able to cause a lot of confusion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Incandenza Report post Posted July 19, 2002 They look bigger in the first picture, but a lot more up in the second one. It's gotta be the bra. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites