Guest Report post Posted May 20, 2002 Did anyone see this on Rajah (stolen from PWTorch I think) "Stephanie McMahon was not backstage at last week's RAW, which is the first show she has missed for quite some time. Shane McMahon has not been at a TV event for the past couple of months. Before, he had been a regular in helping with production." Isn't it so convenient that she just HAPPENS to not be at last week's Raw, the WORST RAW EVER. I guess this way she couldn't be blamed for it's level of sucktitude. I guess Jericho must have been filling in on the booking committee for her. Or at least that's what HHH told me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest crandamaniac Report post Posted May 20, 2002 Isn't it so convenient that she just HAPPENS to not be at last week's Raw, the WORST RAW EVER. I guess this way she couldn't be blamed for it's level of sucktitude. I guess Jericho must have been filling in on the booking committee for her. ok, so you say that because of the fact Stephanie wasn't at raw is proof that she was not the contributing factor to the ratings decline? Haven't you realized that Raw has been in a steady drop since about mid-2001? By your logic, if Hogan missed one show, and it was one of the best Raw's ever, could we then blame the level of suckiness on Hogan? no, b/c this is all purely coincedence. You're theory does not hold up Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted May 20, 2002 ok, so you say that because of the fact Stephanie wasn't at raw is proof that she was not the contributing factor to the ratings decline? Haven't you realized that Raw has been in a steady drop since about mid-2001? By your logic, if Hogan missed one show, and it was one of the best Raw's ever, could we then blame the level of suckiness on Hogan? no, b/c this is all purely coincedence. You're theory does not hold up No, you're misreading his theory. He's in fact saying the opposite. He's saying that she is conveniently absent from one of the "Worst RAWs ever" in an attempt to be separated from the bad product, as though it is not her fault that the shows are so bad. He's saying she IS a contributing factor and is trying to cover it up and make it look like she isn't. Only she's not doing a good job of it, because he sees through it. At least that's how I read it. I suppose if I'm wrong too, the author can clarify things for us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ozymandias Report post Posted May 20, 2002 Sounds about right to me. Bitch didn't wanna be anywhere near the scene of the crime. I wouldn't either and have to deal with seeing the wrestlers in the back and having them know that you wrote this garbage. She may be hideously untalented, but she ain't stupid. She knew what an abortion of a show she'd written, so she stayed the fuck away. Smart girl. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
