Guest Sandman9000 Posted May 29, 2002 Report Posted May 29, 2002 Sorry mangs, I don't meet the current requirements. I've only beaten SuperStar. I'm like 1-5. As much as I hate to say this, I can't be ranked right now.
Guest alfdogg Posted May 29, 2002 Report Posted May 29, 2002 Right now, it's judged by win-loss record in singles matches. But next time I update, I'll factor in feuds.
Guest alfdogg Posted May 29, 2002 Report Posted May 29, 2002 I had you as 2-4. I guess I'll have to check again.
Guest Some Guy Posted May 29, 2002 Report Posted May 29, 2002 #4! That's cool. I think I'm undefeated in Singles and have only lost the stupid tag match against Men On a Mission. Plus me and CWM are going to win the Tag Belts (hopefully) so I'm moving on up!
Guest Big Poppa Popick Posted May 29, 2002 Report Posted May 29, 2002 top 10 should be people judged by a) win/loss record b) position in feuds (are they high or low cards) c) impact in feuds (ie, interference in matches, effective or not) Your way seems like a good idea. That's why Caboose was #2 on my Top 10. Due to his position in a feud. Somebody would need to keep track of such a top 10. World Title rankings...cool, but factor every match in...not just singles... Let me fool around with a mathematical formula...Ill debut it on INTENSEzone! and we will have the top10 rankings... i have to decide on weightings...ill talk more on sunday
Recommended Posts