Tennis Thread: March.

[Mr. S£im Citrus 0]

I must have different criteria for whether or not someone is bad for tennis:

 

1) Is she a talented tennis player?

 

2) Does she make the Tour money?

 

3) Does she contribute to other people wanting to play tennis?

[pochorenella 0]

And now Nadal lost to Djokovich while Roddick had to retire in the first set versus Murray. The youngsters are really clicking now, should be a great year for them.

[Dark Age 0]

There's a good chance Murray and Nole could be 7 and 8 respectively come next week, which is a pretty huge improvement already. I think Murray's racked up as many wins this year as he had by August last year.

[Guest Queen Leelee]

I must have different criteria for whether or not someone is bad for tennis:

 

1) Is she a talented tennis player?

 

2) Does she make the Tour money?

 

3) Does she contribute to other people wanting to play tennis?

1) Yes.

 

2) Who cares.

 

3) Every player does.

 

You're not understanding the negatives with Serena. So, I'll stop with this.

[Guest Queen Leelee]

Every board I go to is filled with Murray haters. So, I'm lost on how to post here.

 

Mopey does have a pretty game. And wonderful strokes. He's also maybe not the biggest asshole Andy on tour. There, positives.

[Guest Queen Leelee]

Serena d. Justine 0-6 7-5 6-3. Nice fighting by Serena. Nice of Justine to finally show that everyone else in the WTA are mental weaklings.

 

Mopey put up a good performance vs. Djokovic. Lollers.

[Narcoleptic Jumper 0]

man oh man I cannot wait for the men's final tomorrow. best of 5! I'm thinking it might go the distance. Murray has issues.

[Guest Queen Leelee]

Either Novak blows Willy away in straights, with how he's played the last 2 weeks, he's capable of. If it's a long match, Canas wins. Djokovic is a wimp, and has faltered in just about every "clutch" situation he's been in.

[Mr. S£im Citrus 0]

I must have different criteria for whether or not someone is bad for tennis:

 

1) Is she a talented tennis player?

 

2) Does she make the Tour money?

 

3) Does she contribute to other people wanting to play tennis?

1) Yes.

 

2) Who cares.

 

3) Every player does.

 

You're not understanding the negatives with Serena. So, I'll stop with this.

Offhand, I'm guessing the tour.

 

As long as Serena makes the tour money, I doubt very much that they'd agree with your opinion that she's bad for tennis... And I'm not "understanding" the negatives because you haven't provided any; you just said that she's "bad for tennis," and took it for granted that I would agree with you.

[Narcoleptic Jumper 0]

If it's a long match, Canas wins. Djokovic is a wimp, and has faltered in just about every "clutch" situation he's been in.

 

this is where he would then step it up to the next level and prove that he's capable, which I think we know he is. he'll do fine.

[pochorenella 0]

BUMP.

 

So Federer FINALLY beat Nadal on clay to claim the Hamburg Championship. Good for Roger after a rather lackluster year (for his standards, anyway). It gives him a good boost to go after that Roland Garros Title.