Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted June 28, 2007 www.poopreport.com With such fascinating articles such as, The Summer Stoolstice: The universe is like a giant Swiss clock. Gravity and other magical forces effortlessly keep the planets and the stars floating around space with the precision and regularity that only someone on all-oatmeal diet can possibly replicate. So exact is the rotation of the Earth around the sun that on every June 21, without fail, there occurs the celestial event known as the Summer Solstice. This is the day when the tilt of the Earth is at its least drastic relative to the sun, and thus occurs, in the Northern Hemisphere, the longest day of the year. The Summer Solstice has happened every year since the Earth started rotating. June 21st, 2005, however, also marks the third annual celebration of a very important tradition here at PoopReport: the Summer Stoolstice. Achieving the elusive eighteen-incher is a difficult feat; but if there were one day a year to strive for it, this is it. The trick is two-fold: a regimented two-day diet of hard-to-pass sustenance, followed by a sudden massive influx of cleansing fiber. Starting on June 19, you want to fill up your stomach with a mess of difficult-to-digest bung (PHASE 1), and then bind it and shove it all loose with a tremendous burst of fiber (PHASE 2). My intuition tells me that Phase 1 should consist of fatty meat, cooked as thoroughly as you can stand it. A little bit of research brought me to Digestive Control by Anne Mears, which gives us these tips: "The specific food vs. digestion time: Carbohydrates (fruits, cereals) require the least amount of time to digest; proteins (legumes) is second, and last of all, requiring the most time to digest are the lipids (nuts, nut butters). A mixture of two or three (beans and rice) requires even more time to digest." "Method of food preparation: Fried food or foods containing high amounts of oils or hardened fats, require more time to digest. A cereal cooked very well is easier to digest than one that is partially cooked." "Too much water or juice taken with the meals will dilute the digestive juices, and slow digestion: 'Food should not be washed down. Taken with meals, water diminishes the flow of saliva; and the colder the water, the greater the injury to the stomach... The more liquid there is taken into the stomach with the meals, the more difficult it is for the food to digest; for the liquid must first be absorbed.'" Ms. Mears, of course, suggests we should avoid slow digestion. But in Phase 1 of celebrating the Summer Stoolstice, slow digestion is exactly what you want -- you want to retain as much of your food in your stomach as you can. So follow the above guidelines all day the 19th and most of the 20th to ensure record-breaking bulk. But building up your internal mass is the simple part. That's like packing a barrel full of gunpowder -- easy, but benign without a fuse. So on the evening of the 20th, you bring your preparations to fruition. On the 20th, the last meal you should eat (dinner, if you dine late, or a late-night snack) should be as much fiber as you can possibly handle. Oatmeal, for instance. At least two bowls. Oatmeal, bran muffins, fiber-filled cereal, raw green veggies, brown rice, beans, a triple helping of Metamucil for dessert... they don't make the most delectable dinner, I know. But for the Summer Stoolstice, this is the sacrifice that must be made. In order to achieve maximum chunk on the 21st, you need this injection of fiber to bind your churning mound and push it out. Making its way through your system, the fiber should scrape your internal nooks and crannies clean and free of any clinging pockets of stool, clumping your huddled masses together in what you hope to be a celestial event of your own. Pooping for sport (or ritual, in this case) is not an easy task. No two colons react the same, which means what works for me may not work for you. However, if you follow these guidelines starting on June 19th, June 21st should be a long and memorable day for you indeed. Good luck! Grown people talking about their shit. The world wide web is truly groundbreaking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JJ Johnson 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 I like that this is filed under "Techniques". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giuseppe Zangara 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 It's the net. Don't act suprised. Inc's post made me laugh. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Copper Feel 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 Hey Gary Floyd, I hear that Inc does not like you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 Hey Gary Floyd, I hear that Inc does not like you. no shit. I've pretty much accepted that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
luke-o 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 I was actually expecting "forums.thesmartmarks.com" to be the first post in this thread. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 I wonder when somebody will make a ScatTube. Not that I want to see it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giuseppe Zangara 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 One of Todd Rundgren's sons has his own website, one of the few on the web that could legitimately be dismissed as "useless." To make matters worse, Rebop (yes, that's his real name) looks just like daddy, right down to the gaps between his teeth. Poor kid. His father, meanwhile, has a website of his own, which, while definitely more useful than his son's, is much, much worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 Check out those locks Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Giuseppe Zangara 0 Report post Posted June 28, 2007 And oh, jeez, again, not "useless," but this place is, sadly, the best and most authoritative site on John Updike and all matters relating to Updike. The layout is like some Geocities production from 1996. Navigating it is frustrating, though, if you have patience, it does occasionally bear fruit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ravenbomb 0 Report post Posted June 29, 2007 http://www.zombo.com Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted June 29, 2007 Awesome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted June 29, 2007 The Brad Pitt is Ugly Foundation. Why not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PUT THAT DICK IN MY MOUTH! 0 Report post Posted June 30, 2007 http://www.wewintheylose.com/ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted June 30, 2007 www.blinkerfluid.com has a lot of links to retardedly stupid sites. They are the kings of such nonsense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted July 1, 2007 Which letter of the alphabet did your last poop resemble?: I J S L C Other Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lt. Al Giardello 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2007 Atleast that site doesn't think Jake Plummer is a better QB then Donovan McNabb. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted July 1, 2007 What does that have to do with anything?! And, since as usual you tend to miss the point of whatever anyone says, Plummer had a comparable season to McNabb in 2005, which is most likely when I said that. In fact, a better season as 1. He actually played all 16 games which McNabb hasn't done since 2003 (in fact, in 8 seasons, he's only had 3 full seasons under his belt, though you can't really count his first year in the league too much), had more touchdowns and yards, and less interceptions. He regressed last year as he normally does, but then again McNabb also got injured again last year, so it's not saying much. When even Eagles fans were calling for JEFF FREAKING GARCIA to start over McNabb, that's saying something about his value to the franchise. Although, you're about as worthless a poster and human being as any of these sites are to the internet, and not even a minutiae as amusing, so I don't know why I bother. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted July 1, 2007 What does that have to do with anything?! And, since as usual you tend to miss the point of whatever anyone says, Plummer had a comparable season to McNabb in 2005, which is most likely when I said that. In fact, a better season as 1. He actually played all 16 games which McNabb hasn't done since 2003 (in fact, in 8 seasons, he's only had 3 full seasons under his belt, though you can't really count his first year in the league too much), had more touchdowns and yards, and less interceptions. He regressed last year as he normally does, but then again McNabb also got injured again last year, so it's not saying much. When even Eagles fans were calling for JEFF FREAKING GARCIA to start over McNabb, that's saying something about his value to the franchise. Although, you're about as worthless a poster and human being as any of these sites are to the internet, and not even a minutiae as amusing, so I don't know why I bother. Oh calm down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites