Guest Angle-plex Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 If you had a choice to make one of the two (Taker and Triple H) leave, which one would it be? I would probably pick Taker, just becaues he is older, and doesn't sell anything anymore (Did he ever?).
Guest CanadianChick Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Taker...he is real useless
Guest Sandman9000 Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd take Triple H, simply because he has more time left then BikerTaker. Once BikerTaker retires, we will be rid of both of them. If I chose BikerTaker, we would have to wait for HGH to retire. Since BikerTaker will most likely retire before HGH, I'll take HGH and wait for the BikerTaker to quit.
Guest BAR Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd take HHH out of there and wait for 'Taker to retire soon (Hopefully!)
Guest BoboBrazil Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH, just because he has too much of an effect on booking. If he didn't have a hand in that due to dating Stephanie than I would keep HHH and get rid of Undertaker.
Guest Anglesault Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH because he's worse than Taker.
Guest Trivia247 Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 More taker hating Bashing... Im Ashamed of all of you.. Bad smarks..Bad Bad!
Guest The Electrifyer Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH as champ bored me much worse than UT did. HHH now bores me much worse than UT does. So I would take HHH out, if it were up to me.
Guest Angle-plex Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH, just because he has too much of an effect on booking. If he didn't have a hand in that due to dating Stephanie than I would keep HHH and get rid of Undertaker. Unforgiven proved that Taker has booking power as well.
Guest TheBostonStrangler Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I prefer UT to HHH. HHH and UT both insist on making younger opponents look bad, but HHH does it in every segment. Undertaker does not. Therefore, I'd get rid of HHH.
Guest Trivia247 Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Undertaker at least doesn't beat people with a sleeper hold.
Guest Anglesault Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH, just because he has too much of an effect on booking. If he didn't have a hand in that due to dating Stephanie than I would keep HHH and get rid of Undertaker. Unforgiven proved that Taker has booking power as well. But he has the GOOD kind. Undertaker at least doesn't beat people with a sleeper hold. The Dragon sleeper isn't much better.
Guest Angle-plex Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH, just because he has too much of an effect on booking. If he didn't have a hand in that due to dating Stephanie than I would keep HHH and get rid of Undertaker. Unforgiven proved that Taker has booking power as well. But he has the GOOD kind. Still, Taker jobbing to Brock was the right thing to do (for business), and if that's what the boss wanted, than Taker should have gone out there and did his job instead of bitch about jobbing because "The face losing wouldn't set up a rematch".
Guest Trivia247 Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Dragon sleeper at least is umm...lol inventive? who'd knew that Throat thrusting Chokeslamming, Tombstoning Last Riding, Top rope Wristlocking Forearm smashing Maniac could pull off a Dragon Sleeper. Sleeper hold basic has been so unplayed that everyone going into a SLeeperhold almost always belly to back suplex out of it these days... Everyone...But the ALL POWERFUL LESNAR LIKE HHH!
Guest Pop Culture God Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd choose HHH, because at THE VERY LEAST the fans still give a shit about Taker. Taker: Retire at WM XIX
Guest Anglesault Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Taker should have gone out there and did his job instead of bitch about jobbing because "The face losing wouldn't set up a rematch". Well he IS right. The Face losing sets up a rematch-That the face WINS.
Guest Angle-plex Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Taker should have gone out there and did his job instead of bitch about jobbing because "The face losing wouldn't set up a rematch". Well he IS right. The Face losing sets up a rematch-That the face WINS. It doesn't matter if he's right. If the WWE wanted him to job, then he should have. Brock "Bearhug of Doom" Lesner should have gotten the win.
Guest Trivia247 Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 the only way for a Face to lose to setup a rematch if the Heel beats him via cheating.. Oh but if Lesnar so Much as put a foot on the rope, you all would complain OHHHh Taker can't be pinned Clean, Ohhh That Bastard How dare he! Lesnar looks like such a bitch compared to him.. Its no win. Complain complain Complain.
Guest BaldFish Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 HHH. Because he's basically the reason RAW sucks, compared to SmackDown.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Eh, I'd choose Taker. RAW sucks mostly because the talent there is just so mediocre to bad. I honestly can't think of one single good-to-great worker on the RAW roster at all right now.
Guest Mad Dog Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd chuck Trips. Never before have I seen one man drag a whole show down to the depths of hell like he has.
Guest Mattdotcom Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'll pull out Taker's favorite finish, the Double-DQ, and send both of their sorry asses to wherever the hell they wind up in this fantasy. Dragon sleeper at least is umm...lol inventive?who'd knew that Throat thrusting Chokeslamming, Tombstoning Last Riding, Top rope Wristlocking Forearm smashing Maniac could pull off a Dragon Sleeper. Please refrain from using that nickname. If the WWE picks it up, I'll throw myself out of a window. And my dad could pull off a Dragon Sleeper. It's nothing special.
Guest Angle-plex Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 the only way for a Face to lose to setup a rematch if the Heel beats him via cheating.. Oh but if Lesnar so Much as put a foot on the rope, you all would complain OHHHh Taker can't be pinned Clean, Ohhh That Bastard How dare he! Lesnar looks like such a bitch compared to him.. Its no win. Complain complain Complain. Well, the least Taker could do would be let Brock get a little control of the match. Taker dominated the match, had Brock pinned when the ref was down, and threw him through the stage after the match. Even hardcore Taker marks can't deny there is something wrong there.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 Dragon sleeper at least is umm...lol inventive?who'd knew that Throat thrusting Chokeslamming, Tombstoning Last Riding, Top rope Wristlocking Forearm smashing Maniac could pull off a Dragon Sleeper. Please refrain from using that nickname. If the WWE picks it up, I'll throw myself out of a window. And my dad could pull off a Dragon Sleeper. It's nothing special. LOL! Myabe Christian will turn it into his resthold of choice once the chinlock goes out of style...
Guest The Notorious CRD Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd definitely get rid of Triple H. Then I'd use his departure as an example to everyone who thinks they "deserve" a push by proxy of banging the boss's daughter.
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd definitely get rid of Triple H. Then I'd use his departure as an example to everyone who thinks they "deserve" a push by proxy of banging the boss's daughter. Uhhhh... one thing though: Trips was being pushed before he started banging Stephanie.
Guest Zero_Cool Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd get rid of Triple H, just because he has done more to damage the product than has Taker.
Guest El Psycho Diablo Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd chuck BOTH Taker and HHH. Taker is simply put..useless. A guy like him shouldn't be in the main event. Upper midcard (*cough* Sideshow) maybe, but not HEADLINING the fucking company. His matches are bad to abyssmal, he's not -that- over that he never needs to lose..and he never loses anyway. Nobody ever gets one up on the 'taker without having him look better in the end. The stuff HHH has pulled is just too much to forgive.
Guest New World Order of Wrestling Posted September 29, 2002 Report Posted September 29, 2002 I'd easily take Triple H over the Undertaker. Whoever says the Undertaker is a better worker than Triple H is fooling themselves. Just because you don't like his backstage antics, it doesn't mean you have to completely shit on his work in the ring. He isn't great, he isn't good, he isn't average, but he is NOT as bad as the Undertaker.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now