Jump to content
TSM Forums
  • entries
    83
  • comments
    811
  • views
    32928

HTQ's Random Thoughts; includes a little MMA

Sign in to follow this  
Hunter's Torn Quad

350 views

Booker T and Batista: It's a work, pure and simple. It's a nice attempt at trying to make a worked angle seem legit, but it's a complete work. That said, at least the resulting matches should be good.

 

Rey's treatment as World Champion: This has been beyond horrible. Since just after the Rumble, they've booked Rey just about as bad as you could possibly book him, especially as World Champion. He was mistreated before winning the belt, being beaten just the week before he won the World title, and since then Rey has, outside of the match with Randy Orton, been treated as an absolute joke. His size, which can either work for him or against him, has been handled in such a terrible manner as to make it an albatross around his neck rather than something positive, which it could be. Worst of all, he's been beaten clean two weeks in a row, by Mark Henry and Khali, and it's not even to set up a future title match; Rey's next PPV match is against JBL, and he's set to lose the belt there. There is no way to credibly rationlize or justify this treatment of Rey, but it is, sadly, no real surprise when you consider the size-obsession of those in charge of the decision making process in WWE.

 

The 'return' of ECW: With this being a pet project of Vince McMahon, this has every possible chance of succeeding, because Vince is going to put all of his muscle behind this. That said, there are still a number of pitfalls for this project to overcome. First of, while Vince is apparently gung-ho on making this work, the biggest chance of this succeeding is also the biggest chance it has of failing, and that's Vince. For this to work, and I mean really work, Vince has to think differently to how he usually does, but with the same drive. He can't use a WWE mentality to make an ECW (even if it's really WWE) project work. For this to work it has to be different to WWE in as many ways as possible, or it'll just be a third WWE brand, and we don't need another one of those.

 

The return of DX: This will be a short-term success, but it has no legs if it's the same DX from 1997-1999. That DX, as hot as it was, was part of another era, and to try and recreate that success today just isn't going to work. Shawn and Hunter reuniting will get a huge pop, but for this to have any kind of lifespan, it cannot be the same DX it used to be. For one thing, Shawn and Hunter are now nine years older and, lilke it or not, fans just are not going to be buy people of their age, almost 41 and 37 respectively, playing at being young punks. They could, just about, get away with it during the original run of DX, but it simply won't work now. I'm not even sure Shawn and Hunter can pull of being punks, at least in the vein that the DX name will warrant, but for it to work they need to make this version of DX a new variation on an old formula, but if it's the same DX as from 1997, then it will be a bomb.

 

Jim Cornette in TNA: This could have been a good thing for TNA, but it won't be, simply because for TNA to really hit it big the kinds of changes needed, especially taking Jeff Jarrett out of the main event scene, just are not going to happen. Whatever positives could come from Cornette being part of TNA are going to be more than offset by the simple fact that until TNA makes fundamental changes; Jeff Jarrett out of the main event scene, a proper structure to the X-Division, more believable/realistic angles,etc, then nobody who gets brought in is going to have any kind of long-term positive effect. TNA needs to change from within before it can anything other than a distant, and cold, #2.

 

Matt Hughes versus Royce Gracie: I think time has passed Royce by, and unless something very strange happens, then Hughes is going to win, and I would not be surprised if he mananges to get Gracie to tap out. Hughes in the 4th round by stoppage.

 

TUF 3: Ken Shamrock is either a bad coach or he's been edited to look like one. Add to that the fact that Tito is so much better at coaching, and Ken comes across as a behind-the-times old guy who seems unable or unwilling to modernize his approach to teaching the fight game.

 

Sign in to follow this  


3 Comments


Recommended Comments

An enjoyable read with many excellent points.

 

With Rey, I had no problems with the idea of him as a transitional champion from Mania to Judgment Day, but that was on the assumption that they booked him well leading up to it. It sounds like JBL has one more opponent for Rey next week, and who knows if Rey will win or lose. The only logic I see in this is that, much like when Jericho was losing every match before Vengeance, Rey goes over on PPV. I know that was not the plan, but I seriously don't get what the point of having him lose every week before losing the title would be. Hell, even with the Angle match, he said the next week he was about to tap out before Henry ran in.

Share this comment


Link to comment

The logic behind beating a guy before he gets the world title is to set up future title matches with the people who beat him. The problem with that logic is that it doesn't work in every situation. With Jericho, all it did was make him seem even more of a joke and nobody took his world title reign seriously. The logic makes even less sense with Rey, because he's not somebody you can, or should, beat so often in such a short space of time. Dave Meltzer has said that the mindset behind Rey's treatment is that they didn't even want him to have the belt at all and he only got it because it made a good story, but beyond that they're not going treat him like a real world champion because that isn't what they wanted.

Share this comment


Link to comment

The bottom line is it seems like they are punishing him for having the audacity to be a sympathetic enough character to be given a world title victory at WrestleMania (though many fans became sick of the act by Mania). But this comes from a company that determined the best way to capitalize on Matt Hardy's immense popularity in the fall of 2005 was to do nothing with him, then punish him for not wanting Undertaker to derail his momentum for no reason. I'm generally not a fan of the WCW/WWE comparisons people enjoy making, but I do think Meltzer's "dangerously high buyrate" quote about Hart vs. Flair from Souled Out 98 is appropriate these days (though in a slightly different context, as this has nothing to do with PPV buys but fan reactions and/or TV ratings).

Share this comment


Link to comment
×