At Home

I'm still waiting for Marv to tell me why that woman wouldn't own a house.

Why wouldn't these people be able to own a house, Marv?

There should be plenty of information available, probably on wikipedia.

I turn 18 in February, so I'm cutting it pretty close as well.

Great to hear it, bob. I still can't vote.

This is because Drudge just cherry picks the results he likes. Fixed

Was that a joke? So, you're telling me that you're scared of the direction this country could be heading towards under Obama vis-a-vis some bullshit redistributionist welfare and socialist rhetoric. As for the three figures up there: Not to mention that only 1.9% of American households make over $250k a year, as this graph shows, not your purported 5%. That's bullshit. Not to mention FURTHER, that Obama is raising the tax cuts on the wealthy only back to Clinton levels. Was it redistribution then? How about under Reagan, when they were higher than Obama's proposed rate? Furthemore, it would be nice to cut taxes for everyone, but perhaps you could present another way to somehow balance the budget. John McCain proposed cutting taxes for the lower class too, is this putting money into the hands of the poor as well? How can you base tax increases on the top less than 2% as the "direction" of the country? What about health care? What about the continuation of a failed foreign policy program? What about the wall street meltdown? Why would you vote for a man who's entire economic policy is based around cutting earmarks, which amount to only a microscopic amount in the federal budget? Please, reconsider what fuels the direction of the United States, and perhaps it'll become obvious that John McCain is the wrong man for the job. Also, do you make more than $250,000 a year? If not, please tell me where your money is going to be "handed to" the lower class under Barack Obama's tax plan, but not John McCain's tax plan.

I'm still talking about it because Ohio could end up being a key state and the shit is still happening. Just because it's an old topic doesn't mean it's not a relevant topic. Fivethirtyeight has Obama's chances in Ohio at 85% likelihood of a win. Furthermore, I'm going to stick by the NYT article I posted some time ago that writes, with resolve, that virtually never in history have ballots been actually falsely cast. Something like that.

Where can I find this

Greenman did indeed save my life. I went to a party and was definitely the hit. About 25% of the people knew who I was, but everyone said "holy shit, that's awesome" when I passed. People were pouring shit into me like there was no tomorrow. All this, and I managed to race someone home on my bike on wet streets and won.

You're still talking about ACORN? Moving on.

You know, because Obama should've just donated it back into the banks. That would've made everyone happy.

1st Amendment? We just went over that. This absolutely does not fall under the 1st amendment no matter how you turn it. And you're also wrong about the reporter. She didn't ask Biden how he felt about people referring to Obama's programs as socialist, she outright called them socialist. Furthermore, she insinuated that Obama's proposals were Marxist. Furthermore, the entire damn interview was a ridiculous sham of an interview; the lowest rungs of journalism.

Definitely.

THIS POLICY WILL BE STRICTLY ENFORCED UNLESS I AM DATING YOU

That lamp is bitchin. Ikea also sells a dimmer controller for it too, and that's nice to have. Gives off a real soft glow when you turn it down.

There's white hispanic and white non-hispanic.

I like the taste

I just threw up in my mouth.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/200...alin/index.html

Joe Biden. Dude hates jews more than anyone else in Washington.

Women who were accused of being witches were hung and burned in the same fashion way before the KKK was using it against black people. So I guess you're wrong. Link to a blog with a good opinion on the matter Is anyone here defending that effigy? I thought not.