The Metal Maniac

You just ruined my childhood.

I second "My Humps". Hump is an ugly word, conjuring up images of hunchbacks and such. Why repeat it ad nauseum to describe something that's supposed to be sexy?

Gee, I just LOVE having my intelligence insulted constantly. "Lita must've overheard Trish talking about her retirement!" Yeah, cuz it's not like it's been ALL OVER THE INTERNET FOR MONTHS YOU DOUCHEBAGS. Jesus. DX vs McMahons and Big Show in HitC? Holy fucking shit, END THIS ABYSMAL FEUD. It makes NO SENSE. Why the shit doesn't he just FIRE DX? Fuck. I think I need to be stoned when I watch RAW.

Spiff, you're my new hero.

I'm dissapointed with the lack of Calvin and/or Hobbes.

If this isn't a pot/kettle/black situation, I dunno what is. I think, if this poves anything, it's that WP is not the only sad, sad case on the earth. Just the saddest.

You got owned because some girls had an orgasm like that. And some guy got a stiffie....and... Holy shit, this is sad. WP, are you aware that female genitals don't work the same way as a males? Hell, were you even aware that female genitals are diferent then a males?

Absinthe can be tasty. And fun. Flaming sugarcubes? Hells yes. Though the proper mixing does get tricky after a drink or two. And it's expensive as hell, at least around here.

I KNOW I shouldn't, but... Nope, try again. There are about 15 people posting in the Astroboy thread though that's just from memory. I could be off some. http://forums.thesmartmarks.com/index.php?...boy&st=1890 A full page of WP. And that's just the first one I found. There's more.

Didn't you ever see his Astroboy thread? Post after post after post, of JUST HIM.

I think the best way for 'Taker to put someone over would be to have him vanish for a bit, then return, prolly with some heel manager that everyone hates, so that he could be a heel as well. This would be the hardest part; making Undertaker a heel. Anyway, assuming it could be done, have him come back as a surprise entrant in the Rumble, win, and go on to face a babyface champ at WM. Then they could build up the streak, the fact that most RR winners manage to win, yada yada yada, 'Taker loses. That'd put someone over BIG.

So....the puppet in the trailer says "Hello America...do you want to play a game?" Unless that's just something they tossed in there for fun, is it not possible that he's somehow got an insane plot which involves, well, all of America? I dunno, maybe he's gonna set off a nuke if people lose the game.

Neptune's orbit is much more circular then Pluto's. Since the new definition of planet says that a planet must have a circular orbit, and Pluto's orbit isn't circular (it's oval, like an egg), Neptune is a planet, and Pluto is not. Neptune's orbit is pretty normal. It's Pluto's orbit that's fucked up. http://www.rfcafe.com/references/general/solar_system.htm Click that link to see. You're an amateur astronomer, and you think that having a solid definition of planet for the first time ever, and a re-arranging of the solar system doesn't affect you at all? That's pretty amateur.

I can't help it CWM; I see ignorance like this and I can't just let it slide.

Again, there's a difference between choosing something, and being raised to believe something. And you and I have both come to the conclusion that we've just always liked girls. Why should it be assumed that gay people don't get the luxury of just knowing what gender they prefer, and have to sit down and go "Hmmm, yeah, I think I'm gonna be gay"? Some people like to try new things. For example, different types of sex partners. Sometimes they don't like it as much (or at all) and they revert back to straightness. I don't see why a chick wanting to know what it feels like to make out with a chick means gay people make a concious choice to be gay.

So, if your sexuality is a choice, answer my first question: When did you choose to like girls? I know I never made a concious choice; girls just always got my motor running, since I was young. Why should we assume that gay people do get to make a concious choice in the matter? I'm Catholic too, for what it's worth.

They choose to get a sex change, but only because (in most cases) they feel like they're actually a woman in a man's body, or vice-versa. And I doubt they one day woke up and decided to choose to feel that way, considering, as you said, they KNOW they'd get shit for it.

Then you shoulda said that in the first place. BIG difference between choosing to be gay, and factors in your life causing you to be gay. Um, they don't choose that lifestyle either. Again, it makes no sense for someone to choose something like that.

"I dunno if I like girls or not...why don't we fuck and find out?"

Wait; how is it that nigger is fine, but if you replace the er with an A, then it's bad?

Considering how gays are and have been treated in society since well, like, forever, why would anyone actually choose to be gay of their own free will? Like, think about it. What kind of a person thinks to themself "You know, I could be heterosexual and fit in with normal society, but I think I'd rather ostracize myself and make my life a lot more difficult then it needs to be!" Or, to put it another way: When did you *choose* to like girls?

Aren't salaries part of the budget? And you said that with his profits, they might break even at $600 mil. So doesn't that mean they'd have to get $520 mil to break even if he's out of the equation? Sure, if they made $600 mil, they'd be up $80 mil, but it just seems weird to me that they'd plan for a movie to have to make (at least) $520 mil to start making a profit. But maybe I just don't understand Hollywood.

So wait...you're telling me (assuming Cruise was not in the equation) that the profit from the DVD and ticket sales had to be at least $520 million dollars for them to break even? That doesn't seem to make sense.

Okay, so I'm just slow, not crazy. Works for me.

Am I the only one seeing that this thread has 6 replies, and no views?