Dr. Tyler; Captain America

Font Check Font Check Font Check Font Check Font Check

It was supposed to be about how badly Bush is polling, and it continues. http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob.htm

DUDE.

I need stuff like the links to the previous Genesis PPV's, a bit of explaination on the current feuds, and the lyrics to "O Fortuna". Hit me up on AIM. If I'm away, still hit me up on AIM. Pr0p43t1c1n3

Ah, the NY Post. What a liberal rag.

Defense may win championships, but you need pretty much all of those to have a shot at winning it in the first place. If you have a serious deficiency in any one of those catergories, you will lose. Period. You may win a few games, and you may even get lucky like the Rat Birds, but you won't typically win without the entire package.

After being in fed after fed in the "outside of SWF" realm, I can truly say that there's nothing like the community aspect to this fed in the rest of the fedding world... that's left. I've always wanted to come back to this one just because of that; there's so many people here who are willing to help you out, make you laugh, and shed their egos for a second just to tell you the truth. It's something I wish was more prevelant, in all honesty, but it made me proud to be a member of this little tiny, big fucking fed. I miss it, and you guys should treasure it because your careers won't last forever (unless you're IL).

Indeed.

Only if they make the majority of the population sign the damned petition. Otherwise, you'll just have people signing recall petitions all the time and the governors will do more time campaigning than... well... running the state.

NOPE. You were wrong again, hippy, it had neither Linkin Park nor Staind.

I'm not defending them, I'm stating the argument they likely had. Personally, I don't really care.

No it didn't. Wanker, you didn't even read it.

I'd like to uh, see some statistics on that one. And Marney, do you think invalidating a legal election for governor in order to hold another one that is funded in full by wing nuts (no matter which side of the fence they're on) is in the best interests of the people? What about having a governor who has less than 30% of the state's vote?

I think it has something to do with not putting an entire industry out of work.

If you PM me a few clips from the month, I'd be happy to do it if no one else wants to.

Ejiro Fasaki vs. "The Maori Badass" Va'aiga - I dunno. "The Sinner" John Duran vs. English Dragon - Could be either of them. Jay Dawg vs. The Boston Strangler - Should be close. "The Franchise" Mak Francis vs. "The Sacred One" Andrew Blackwell - This is a tossup. Wildchild vs. Johhny "The Barracuda" Dangerous - WOW. "Deathwish" Danny Williams vs. "TNT" Taylor Nicholas Thompson - TNT Double Jeopardy (Quiz and Show) vs. Crowe and Dante Crane - Zuh? Edwin MacPhisto vs. Nathaniel "Silent" Kibagami - Oh. Dace Night (representing "Grand Slam" Mark Stevens) vs. Bastion (representing the Hville Thugg) vs. Michael Craven (representing the Suicide King) - Weird. AND THE MAIN EVENT… "THE SUPERIOR ONE" TOM FLESHER VS. "JUDGE MENTAL" WILLIAM HEARFORD - COOL.

Find me five poor Mexicans to read my RPs and I'll be a happy man.

The reason I say that King isn't that great an author is because he continues pumping out books at an absurd rate -- most of which are barely any different than his previous ones -- simply to continue making a profit. I'd put him more on the level of Tom Clancy than any "great" author simply for that reason. He had some very influential books, mind you; I'm not stupid enough to deny that. However, the sheer fact that his books really aren't exceptionally well written and the further fact that most are just drivel written for profit, and I can't say with a straight face that the man is our best author.

I posted that above Basically, the reason why Bush v. Gore comes up is because the 9th Circuit's original opinion was laden with references to the aforementioned case, some of which were very valid. However, in reality, the feds have no business intervening in a state election. That being said, the state courts probably should have delayed the election until the machines could be replaced.

Not really.

You can still find them in any library, bookstore, etc. They were just challenged by particular interests at some point in time.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/09/23/...ling/index.html From how I read the ruling, the 9th Circuit basically said that the original opinion was based on the facts of the case and not the appelate jurisdiction of the court. Thus, the potential appeal would be rather pointless and would just waste time. Also, SideFXs, at least we can count on you to spew absolute nonsense and partisan bullshit, too.

Jesus, can you imagine what would happen if we had another 2000-esque fiasco with those ballots? Phew.

I believe, however, that agreement was under the assumption that 2004 would be the next elections, not late 2003. Again, though, our opinions are just that: opinions. It's a wait-and-see type situation for the next two weeks, and there's no sense in debating the merits of either case since the SCOTUS has a history of blatantly disregarding them in cases where they wish to renew or revise precedent. I don't think anyone would argue that's the case here.