Dr. Tom

Because you'd think a billion people trying to destroy one tiny state is the kind of thing they might get involved in. Were they possessed of a spine, that is. Huh? Unless my history is way off, the current state of Israel was formed in 1948. Spoils of war. They would be attacked, defend themselves, and win the land. Why should they give it back? This is how nations have expanded since the beginning. Israel didn't seek to go out and expand their borders, but they had a few million Moslems trying to kill them, defeated them, and took some land for their troubles. Fair play to them, I say. Who are terrorists led by fellow terrorists and puppets of the region's Islamofascist regimes. Waaaah. My heart bleeds. Let's see... Palestine attacked Israel and got their clocks cleaned. Since then, they have taken every measure available to kill as many Israeli civilians as possible. The fact that we can still speak of Palestinians in the present tense is a testament to the patience of Israel. Honestly, I would've wiped them out a long time ago. I love it how you paint the country that routinely suffers terrorist attacks as the aggressor. Tool. And I believe you're a cretin of the first division. How would you handle things if you were in charge of a small country surrounded by more than a billion folks who want to destroy you and put all your people to the sword? How would you handle things if you were in charge of a small country that repeatedly suffered terrorist attacks against its civilians and -- even more appallingly -- its rescue workers? Israel is fighting back, and considering the weapons they have at their disposal, they've shown commendable restraint. Pull your head out of the sand and see the light. There's no conditional modifier necessary there. Because you're a tard who supports terrorism over democracy.

Scott Van Pelt by a nose over Dan Patrick.

Hey, 2000 called... it wants its sour grapes back.

Maybe Dungy thought Nicollette didn't have enough ghetto booty...

By itself, yes. However, it resulted in Clinton getting impeached, which is only the second time in the history of the country that has happened. That makes it historically significant.

I may suck in the kkk league this year, but I can still write a mean football column. Discuss.

What would be wrong with Erica Durance as Lois Lane? She already plays the role on Smallville, and IMO, is quite a spicy meatball.

If you don't have any of the documentation, and you know your mobo's make and model, google it. That should tell you what it will take. If it's a pretty new mobo, you're safe with PC2700 DDR RAM, but it never hurts to look it up and be sure. You might be able to run something faster.

He'd still be alive. We're *compassionate* conservatives...

That's awesome. It's the little acts of Satan which are always the best.

Where's the love for slamming his head in a car door about 3000 times? Calm down now, Mad Dog. There's no need for gratuituous violence...

At least one of those threads is in the Classics section. And as good as they are, they won't improve your posture, hippie.

How come did you typed gotted? I concur wholeheartledly. Though I'd probably want to gouge out his eyes and piss in the empty, bloody eye sockets. That way, he could never see a computer screen again. The hands would have to be cut off next (and all the dangling nerves in the forearm cauterized with a hot knife) so he couldn't type anymore. Then I'd need to cut out his tongue, so he couldn't use one of those crappy voice-recognition programs. Then I'd kick him the crotch one more time, just for good measure.

A little black kid came up to me today and asked if it was OK to be a panelist on a TV show...

'Insurgents' aren't terrorists. Meh, I wish I would've seen this before 100 other people replied for me. Oh well. Anyway, yes they certainly are. Most of the people we're fighting aren't even Iraqis; a lot are from Syria, Iran, and Arabia. I'm sure it gives you a chubby to think that, but it's really quite untrue. That would be because THEY ARE. Bullshit. Utter, unmitigated, 100% bullshit. These beheadings and brutal murders aren't an "attempt to justify" anything, nor are they in response to anything. They're being committed because the people we're fighting are subhuman remorseless savages who don't care two pins who they kill. And here you are, trying to plead their case and make them seem like normal folks who just happen to string up charred bodies and lop the heads off of innocent men and women. You are a morally dangerous shithead. The quickness with which you run the moral equivalency mile is appalling. I'm ashamed to share a genus and species with you. BWAHAHAHAHA! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! If by "supporting to small degree," you mean "demonizing and burying every chance I get," I agree. This really solidifies you as a morally dangerous shithead. In fact, I think you just moved beyond that and became a morally irredeemable piece of subhuman shit. You would kill CIVILIANS and drag their bodies thru the streets? *Civilians*, who are there to do work that helps your country and have nothing to do with the military conflict? Fuck you. I hope you die, miserable and alone, in a pool of your own blood, excrement, and vomit, after weeks of unspeakable agony, you absolutely worthless waste of sperm and egg. You couldn't see neutral if it were as big as the earth and you were standing on the moon looking down.

Sure, why not.

I agree wholeheartedly. Though I'd still bone Nicolette Sheridan, Teri Hatcher, and Felicity Huffman.

^ not a Chris Rock fan, obv.

Bilocation is DEFINITELY breaking news. Thanks for this major update in science.

Good. All insurgents, injured or healthy, should be shot in the head. Terrorist scum deserve no less.

Loss = the weathly elite

To be more accurate, I hate them in any folder that doesn't get bazillions of posts -- and bazillions of idiots -- per day. They've been working so far in the WWE folder, and with all the traffic and tards that place has, it needs something like that. CE is a different animal. The post count is lower, and there are very few retards posting here. While all of us disagree with those on the other side of the fence, I think we all have to admit that very few people who post in this folder with any degree of regularity could be called stupid. And even then, they get that label for their outrageous opinions and the manner in which they present them. I'm not a fan of censoring people's political beliefs, however outrageous and fuckheaded they might be, so I don't like the idea of a "Suspended from CE" group on those grounds. Besides, problems in this folder tend to police themselves. It needs very little direct moderation.

Definitely the right choice. Sure, losing ALL three of Rolen, Edmonds, and Pujols would have been devastating to the Cardinals, but losing its three best offensive players should be devastating to ANY team. Losing just one of them would have a much smaller impact, as we saw when Rolen was hurt late in the season. Without Bonds, the Giants were a AAA team. With a cadaver hitting behind him all year, Bonds still put up ridiculous numbers and had one of the finest offensive seasons in history. There was no other choice to be made. Whoever voted him 3rd should be drowned in McCovey Cove.

Mistake on the Giants' part. Warner hasn't been great the past couple weeks, but I don't think he's played poorly enough to lose the job. The team is 5-4 after sucking the meat missile last season. If Warner had maintained his generally solid play, they might have finished 9-7; now they'll be lucky to go 7-9.

MMM, MMM, MMM, MMM.