cue_meanie
Members-
Content count
144 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout cue_meanie
-
Rank
Picture Me Rollin
-
MMA Comments that Don't Warrant a Thread
cue_meanie replied to RavishingRickRudo's topic in Mixed Martial Arts
I cashed in on Swick at Full Tilt Poker. Took him for 276 bucks, hitting my full house on the river! -
It's weed... like c'mon. Do they think its going to make him run out the back field quicker? There are roided up juice monkey's running around all of professional sports, but god forbid you smoke a joint. I expect a lifetime ban from the NFL.
-
I just witnessed my first drive-by shooting
cue_meanie replied to Kurt Angle Mark's topic in General Chat
...Also a FANTASTIC Tupac song. -
Isn't a joke supposed to be funny?
-
He's not being sued, they're trying to void his trademark on "The Game". No litigation.
-
Is this an actual physical dependancy that you have to fight, or just like a hobby that you would prefer doing but since you can't for whatever reason (job or whatever) then it's easy to just stop? I don't have to stay sober for any particular reason. It's the latter, as Spoon said. Anyone who says there's no physical withdrawl is cooky, though. Going from a chronic smoker to completely sober has about two days of "What fucking planet am I on, again?" Feels a lot like going without sleep. Not a physical withdrawl like coming off a coke binge or heroin or anything, but it's there. There's both harder and easier drugs to quit. I'll probably smoke cigarettes my entire life, for example, but will never do any research chemicals or coke ever again. It's true, I recently went from seriously smoking weed EVERYDAY. Since I was 15 I'd gone maybe 16 hours max without being high, so now at 22, I decided to see how long I could go without "buying" weed. So I didn't quit, because that's just lunatic, but i was an extreme user, like I got high by myself everyday 6 times a day, in addition to getting high with other people. Its been 2 months now, and that first week... well I got drunk everyday just to deal with the loss, and you just feel so out of sorts, there was definately a physical addiction. The only good thing about it so far, when someone gets me high, I AM FUCKED UP. Besides that its been really weird not having that first joint in the morning, or that last joint to go to bed. Basically its changed my life, and I'm still not sure if its for the better or not.
-
I know this is a little late, but Redbaron you know nothing about hockey. It's cool you like Montreal but seriously... you'd want KEN FUCKING KLEE to play defense and make Francis Boullion play forward... GENIUS!
-
A particular town or area doesn't really matter, unless you're comparing strictly outdoor, which not many people I know even smoke. Most of the weed is all grown indoors, and let me tell you, when you're growing weed in your house is doesn't matter what part of the country you're in. Its all about how well you treat the plants, what kind they are, and nutrient levels. That said BC does have the best outdoor stuff, but I'd say only 15% of the weed that is smoked is grown outdoors nowadays.
-
Why? None of those players are better then anyone we already have, including the rookies that haven't been given a chance to shine... Recchi, and Klee will serve the whole NHL better if they just retire. Martin Rucinsky sucked for us 5 years and has only gotten worse. Brad Isbister is a very poor man's Mike Ryder, and everyone brings nothing to the table. In all, I'd be dissappointed if we got any of those players, with possibly Scott Young being the exception. You know Steve Begin can't do all of the toughness for forwards. I mean ya we got Mike Johnson, but I mean put Klee with Rivet or Komisarek and you got a pretty strong second line defence. Thats why there's guys like Isbister and Leclarec who can give us some size. Jim Dowd is one of the best faceoff men in the league, something that is Montreal weakness. Rucinsky played very well with Montreal for his five years, sure not his peak performance, but I mean a second big guy scorer would be able to help Montreal. HAVE YOU SEEN KEN KLEE PLAY HOCKEY IN THE PAST 2 YEARS?!?!?!?! The guy is a joke... every single defensemen we have is leaps and bounds better then him...including Streit. Markov-Rivet Souray-Komisarek Boullion-Dandenault Streit Where does Klee fit in there? Who would you take out? I live in Ontario, hell I think we went to the same college, so I'm sure you saw Toronto play, and you still think KLEE is good enough to replace one of those guys??? And Isbister... where's he going to play? same as Rucinsky? we have our wingers now.. and those guys would be 3rd or 4th line guys that we already have set in our system for much cheaper... and Jim Dowd would be our like what 6th centremen, we already pay our 4th line centre like 2.5 million, I just don't see the point. I was so hoping you were kidding like the other guys said.
-
Why? None of those players are better then anyone we already have, including the rookies that haven't been given a chance to shine... Recchi, and Klee will serve the whole NHL better if they just retire. Martin Rucinsky sucked for us 5 years and has only gotten worse. Brad Isbister is a very poor man's Mike Ryder, and everyone brings nothing to the table. In all, I'd be dissappointed if we got any of those players, with possibly Scott Young being the exception.
-
I agree with that entirely, but thats true of any Tool CD, the more listens the better it gets.
-
You really need to take a hard long look at your life.
-
No Digital Camera(I'm ghetto and have to resort to buying disposable camera's and taking it to Wal-Mart), and WTF is a USB Cable? Anyone that has access to the internet should know what a USB cable is, My grandmother knows what one is, and she doesn't even own a computer.
-
Why the hell not? Northern Lights and Skunks just aren't doing it for you anymore? I'm currently battling a pretty nasty case of tonsillitis, and even i'm going to partake in massive amounts of weed, and some delicious hash oil.
-
It went double platinum, that right there is the definition of mainstream relevance.