HarleyQuinn

28 seconds left, K-State around the 50. I agree, the clock work was just awful

shit...shit shit shit

This is turning into a very close & good game now...who'd a thought it

Now that made me laugh Bored

USC only played #14 ranked Washington State. LSU played #17 Florida, #11 Georgia(twice) and #18 Mississippi

AP stands for Associated Press thus it's the media IIRC

Are upsets generally considered flukey by nature? Honest question since from what I've seen, most "upsets" tend to be fluke-like when looking at records and such.

Well it's assumed that USC kept their starters in in their games(Unless you know otherwise) so in terms of these two teams, it'd be a safe comparison right?

Oklahoma lost to a 11-3(Currently ranked #8 team) in the conferent title game no less...whereas USC lost to a 7-6 California team even if it was in Triple OT, it still counts as a loss

Fucking duh...we've been arguing for a good hour or two so far about this so I'd say it's a safe assumption.

Anklelock, OU has scored more points per victory and has faced more ranked teams in their schedule...what else can we say to prove they are better then USC? Also you can't base everything on one game as I've stated before because then it gives every other game no value at all.

We did bring up valid points that refuted his argument and the guy just insults...thus we've right and he's wrong because he has no ammo to work with.

And you haven't produced one argument....you're the bigger idiot IMO. At least offer an argument that hasn't been shot down

Give us statistics or something besides the Conference Title game and we might give your view a glance but if you're just gonna insult and dance around the issue then just admit that you're wrong.

Just noticed...Oklahoma's season high in points allowed was 35. Otherwise it was 28 and below w/ 1 SO. USC allowed 34 and 32 points, otherwise 28 and below w/ 2 SO's. LSU's the most dangerous defensively as they allowed a season high 24 points, everything else was 19 or below w/ 0 SO's.

Yeah...thus my backing him up with some knowledge

To pull the same trick on you...USC lost to California by 3! Arizona beat California by 28, does that make Arizona the better team? No...same goes for what you just said. It just can't be compared

Based on Rankings and record, K-State was better. You can't compare one game for every team cause then what would the need for records be?

USC would've been forced to play 9-3 Washington State in "their" conference title game if they had one. Oklahoma played Kansas State who were 11-3...much better record then Washington State and a much better team. You really can't compare the conference title game to any of USC's season games because USC didn't have to play a conference title game. Also they got blown out by the currently ranked #8 team so it's not THAT bad. You make it out to be an unranked Ivy League school like Harvard blew them out. Also just b/c they didn't win the conference title doesn't mean they weren't the best in the conference. They still had a better record then conference winner K-State

So just because we pull out facts and reasons to support Oklahoma as the BETTER team then USC, we're suddenly biased? Personally, I could care less about all 3 teams and how they finish(I support Boston College and that's it, heh) but there really is no denying that Oklahoma was the best team this season to this point based on the facts given.

TD Ohio State!!

Although if Ohio State beats KState, wouldn't that also knock KState out of the Top 10?

That'd be really hard on the students if it were to take place over Xmas break. That's 6 games, assuming a team goes from the 1st round to the Championship in roughly a 2 week span. Not to mention Xmas and New Year holidays, etc.

No...no we can't. I'm looking forward to him bitching about it during the Humanitarian Bowl tommorrow. Gee...I wonder why. You guys ask for it by egging him on so if ya don't want to have him talk about OU then don't fucking egg him on. Morons

TD KState!