Nighthawk

That's... really not saying much. I disagree though. I happen to be a huge Jim Varney fan. His dramatic works, few and far between though they may be, are fantastic. One that most have seen is Mr. Nash in Earnest Goes to Jail... I mean, shit, that was one great performance.

Don't say things like "darkest commercial film of Capra's career". They make you sound like a prick. But why would I care what a bunch of people on the internet think of me? That's why I'm telling you now, so you don't say it when it matters.

Don't say things like "darkest commercial film of Capra's career". They make you sound like a prick.

That's a fair judgement for them to make. If those things make them dislike a movie, I'd think they'd be able to accurately tell whether they will like one based on such. Also, silent movies are generally black and white also, plus you have to read them. What an unpleasant experience for such an individual.

I hate the word Texican. I hate all words that combine two other words.

It's a very small percentage of people who haven't seen Titanic or It's A Wonderful Life.

most of it was on a Sunday morning. But still.. it's not like I had anything better to do. That's the problem. Also, though I wouldn't be caught dead discussing politics here, after glancing through this, it seems Mike is right about almost everything.

A game of chess is like a swordfight. You must think first, before you move.

That's what happens when you listen to country. Now buy a Ying Yang Twins album. They sound a lot like ELO.

Shut up, bitch.

You guys suck so bad.

It's some queers singing.

Yeah, I'm playing Mario Brothers and listening to Elton John, so I've got my hands full as well. Jingus is gone for a while, so I'll wait until he gets back, unless somebody else finds them pressingly urgent.

I didn't notice. I dare you to call me stupid.

It's a secret.

Hebrews 10:25.

Doesn't it bother you that nobody noticed?

Ok. So for one, your recollection of Scripture is flawed, though you have the general idea. Quote the real verses if you want specific responses, but I'll give you the gist. Let me start by saying that since Revelation is a book of prophecy, I don't claim to understand it fully. It's the book I find the most difficult to interpret. So anyway, there really isn't a Hell in the old testament. They had Sheol, which was where everybody went when they died, good or bad, basically the eqivalent of the Greek Hades, which it was in fact translated as in the Septuagint. In the new testament, they did mention Hades, and they also had Gehenna, which was the ultimate Hell, where the damned would end up after Hades. Gehenna was the name of Jerusalem's city dump, which was constantly burning. Now if someone is spoken of as being thrown into Gehenna, which was the Judeans knew as a dump, it's not hard to see the connotation as being that they were thrown away, or discarded. The fact that Gehenna was on fire allows for much of the flame talk. Now, there would indeed be great sorrow and suffering in Hell, although you could say it comes from the absence of God. You might even say that God is saying "You don't want me? Ok, I will leave you to yourself." This is a choice a person made, a choice you've implied God should let us have, in fact, but it still results in a sorrowful and regretable state, that being, separation from God. Jesus parable about the rich man and Lazarus was just that. A parable. He told many which weren't to be believed literally.

Some people go to church every day. Ask Steve Harvey.

The best picture's on the cover. That's stupid.

Props to the Dr. Dobson name drop. He's awesome.

Wrong. The Sabbath was Saturday, and it was Jewish. The New Testament says that we are no longer bound by the Sabbath. Christians gather on Sunday because it's the day Jesus rose. Forgive me for not quoting exactly, but there's a verse in Colossians which says one man honors one day above another, and another man doesn't, each according to their conviction, and it's fine either way.

Instead of saying "the standard of salvation is proportionate to your capability", that's actually saying there's "no excuse". Right. If you had never heard of Christ and salvation required a belief in him, that would be an excuse. It's not because the standard is different. If David goes to the baby when he dies, that means he and the baby went to the same place after death. The other two verses establish that David himself went to heaven. I meant 1 Samuel 13:14, sorry. I am. He doesn't exist because Jesus said he doesn't.

Doesn't matter. If he knew you were going to pick frosted flakes before you did it, then you couldn't pick fruit loops. He knew I was going to pick frosted flakes after I picked them, or while I was currently picking them, or before. The point is that there is no before, unless you're bound by time, which God is not. Unless he tries to make 2+2 = 5 and tries to make that rock that he can't lift, then it becomes pretty difficult. Taking the word impossible out and putting "too difficult" in doesn't change anything. It still means he can do everything! No, there is a difference. He can't do anything. Impossible means he can do anything. Too difficult means, if he tries to do something, he does it. Now tell me what the Greek is... Because he created Hell for Satan (supposedly), who is ultimately deserving of Hell because he knew te full extent of God's glory and rejected him. That same passage in Romans I refered means that we are in the same position. Ha ha. You're Ralph Wiggum. No, the verse doesn't say God can do the impossible. Genesis does say that God made light without the sun, therefore, it is not impossible. Sure, why not? You're wrong and you're not fooling anyone with this attempt to cover it up. Being wrong about one thing doesn't negate your entire argument, don't worry. No it didn't. By your wooden interpretation, Genesis says that the firmament was a solid wall beginning at sealevel. They didn't believe that. Yep, sure is. Ok. He used a flood as a thematic counterbalance to the fire he would use later. That's not the wizard did it route either, by the way. That's me being bored. The water was magicked away. This doesn't present a problem until you find a verse that says the water went away by natural means. Or, there were no oceans before then. Or Noah drank it. This is flawed reasoning again. It doesn't say how the water went away, something you could theoretically prove wrong, you are saying that because you don't know how it could, it didn't happen. There is a geological record of it. You betray that you are a parrot and have done no research for yourself. This is flatly false and you are ignorant. Study further. So? So you have no point. I've explained to you what literal is not. You know Martin Luther King believed that freedom produced an audible ringing tone? What an idiot. And JFK thought he was from Berlin? Now that guy was deluded. You don't know anything about the books of Job, or Psalms. Do you even own a Bible or are you just getting this online? The Bible's been used for lots of evil things. Does Charlie Manson prove the White Album wrong? Should the Beatles be put on trial? It's still against the law to kill today, and we still do it as a government. If you can't distinguish between an individual acting as an agent of government and a civillian, go back to third grade. God can make individual commands, pertinent to a specific situation which supercede his general law. Also, he doesn't endorse every action made by someone in the Bible. Ok, maybe I should have. You know, I think we've said enough about free will for the moment. Yeah, I might be defending it, but I'd be wrong. I'm defending the fulfillment of the Israelites Bible now, as an American. Think about that one for a minute. God didn't do a shitty job, and you've shifted the focus. God doesn't have to earn your praise. I have to go for now, I'll finish this response later.

Ripping the flesh off tit? Now that I would like to see.