Justice

Very true. Kerry has brought up a bunch of great points that hopefully will get brought up. BOTH men have, I believe. Bush has, but they haven't come across as weak. Especially how he kept bringing up that POLAND~! was on our side continually during the first 15 minutes of the debate. Poland thing made everyone in our dorm crack up. It was idiotic to the nth degree. At my dorm room, everyone has been cracking up at "I haven't waivered" and "I have been consistant" with Kerry. That got me, too.

Because he was a year in office dealing with an incredibly divisive Congress. Why didn't Clinton get Osama Bin Laden? Naw, let's forget about that. Bush is stumbling again. Get back up and finish strong.

"And you can't proliferate nuclear weapons without dilithium crystal! And we all know how our warp engine program is crapping out!" That's Star TREK, dude.

... Kerry is gonna get fucked up. That was not a good rebuttal at all.

Not... really. And he was saying "How can we saction something that is already sactioned", moron. That's Kerry's gaff. Both are even right now. It's gonna come down to the after-coverage, really. No one has hit anything out of the park yet.

I completely disagree. I think Bush has the strategic advantage because he's actually done a lot in this area. As much without putting troops in. AND CALLED ON IRAN! OMG!

CALL HIM ON DARFUR.

Wow, Kerry is really giving Koffi Annan a run for his money in the race for Secretary Ge- Oh, wait...

They already did. Well... Kerry did when he blasted Bush's cutting of domestic funds while giving more and more money to Iraq. ... Can we get a ban from the CE folder here?

Agreed.

Why not actually try to contribute something? I think the President is sticking to what people get behind him about. I think that's a good thing. Why? You've yet to. Bush is getting schooled. No wonder his campaign is trying to lower expectations for the debate. ... Still watching the wrong debate?

He's addressing the Moderator, which is a big aestetic mistake. And I'll agree with Tyler: he needs to come off a little less angry. Then again, Kerry looks goofy as fuck when he gives a big smile. I'd stop it that as well if I were him.

Yes, but he's also said he didn't agree with Bush's plan (or lack thereof) AFTER the War. ...? Their plans are exactly the same, numb nuts!

Halliburton! Drink!

Rant: "And with every subscription you get a free hippe-bashing billy club!"

One of the more "funny in a desperate sort of way" suggestions: Seriously, I respect the polling stuff, but the guy lacks some reality.

Because it's almost impossible to run a national campaign for primary candidates; the funds just aren't there. If it were like that, Lieberman would have won on name recognition alone.

The Fallout games, along with Icewind Dale, will forever have the best opening cutscenes in my opinion. Especial Fallout 2 with "Kiss to Build a Dream On" playing in the background. In all honesty, Baldur's Gate had a huge manual, and reading Volo's and Elminster's own (and often) contradictory commentaries were neat.

Not only that, he's been doing it with two screen names. I'll give him the chance to voluntarily stop using the newer one, though. Oh come on, tell us who he also is? Can we take guesses?

I find this second quote profoundly relevant to the situation at hand. . Intersting, i find it profoundly obvious that this is the best you can come up with , without you know, not really saying anything or disputing anything at all. Kudos. What is there to dispute? The argument was basically settled months ago. The quote is about someone bringing shitty and unoriginal debate back up doesn't count towards anything like discussion. Besides, HMW basically shows what Noam truly is. And coupling this last part with your last thread, I'm fairly sure you are an idiot, and I'm sure many people will agree with me. Oh dear. Because you know, my previous thread was to be taken 100% literal in the sense that I fullly endorsed the idea, rather than merely acknowledging the principle behind it. Oh how distortions and manipulations run so freely in this folder. No, you only tried to chastise someone who spoke out against it for being to ethnocentric. You're trying to use the Michael Moore defense: "I didn't actually say it or support it, I simply presented it", ignoring how you presented it. It's fairly obvious that from the way you posted it and your brief defenses of it, you supported the idea as well. But if we wanted to be legal about it, I still thinking believing in the principle of allowing other countries to choose each others leaders is moronic. Our foreign policy will always effect other countries, no matter how big or small; if we sign a treaty or don't sign a treaty with a country, should we let other countries vote on our President because invariably it'll affect them in the end?The whole concept of it is just idiotic because everyone would be voting for everyone's leaders. We'd never be able to have an effective domestic policy because everyone who was deciding the Presidency would be living outside of the country. Oh, and I think raising a topic that's been dead for 9 or so months can qualify for stupidity in certain cases.

I find this second quote profoundly relevant to the situation at hand. . Intersting, i find it profoundly obvious that this is the best you can come up with , without you know, not really saying anything or disputing anything at all. Kudos. What is there to dispute? The argument was basically settled months ago. The quote is about someone bringing shitty and unoriginal debate back up doesn't count towards anything like discussion. Besides, HMW basically shows what Noam truly is. And coupling this last part with your last thread, I'm fairly sure you are an idiot, and I'm sure many people will agree with me.

I love how he, well, ignores Zogby's blantant partisanship because he's voting for Kerry. The commentary on that site is generally as accurate as a crappy political blog. >_>

I find this second quote profoundly relevant to the situation at hand.

Trust me, they have them. That's probably the most ignorant statement you can make.

I think I speak for everyone when I say this is the stupidest non-INXS opinion on the CE board in a LONG time.