data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c189/0c189e943e7d2b05a140e34d4a70f81dad5450d2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c47de/c47de4c3ed053064f1032cace7e0cb1d412105d7" alt=""
Spaceman Spiff
Members-
Content count
7662 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Spaceman Spiff
-
Ah, gotcha. I viewed it in IE, and got it.
-
5 works in Firefox (where I'm still stuck, grr...)
-
The font is a very, very faint pink.
-
Are you viewing it in IE? I was using Firefox, and got a blank pic, but when I viewed it in IE, I could see it. Hmm, level 5 has me a bit stumped. Any hints?
-
Yeah, those shirts suck. His current shirt outclasses those 4 choices.
-
It's a shame they can't/won't try to grab the Hubble & bring it back to Earth. It deserves better than to come flaming back to Earth.
-
Your commas & periods go inside your ending quotation marks. Also, 2 spaces after ending punctuation.
-
They don't want to have to pay all those music groups royalties by keeping the videos in the show. And, as great as B&B was, B&B without the videos loses a lot of the appeal.
-
But the main point remains: people are going to plunk down $50 (for WM, $40 for non-WM's) for a PPV (and, if you're talking non-fans, a PPV for something you don't even watch) based on seeing a funny commercial? Seeing a serious wrestling commercial or seeing a funny wrestling commercial isn't going to matter to people who already view the product as a joke. You can't compare it to other companies using funny ads, because they're just going for name recognition. Most people already know about the WWE, so if they're not already watching, the commercials aren't going to matter. These commercials are really only playing to the existing fanbase, not to non-fans. If you want to make that argument (giving your loyal fans a laugh), that'd be fine. But these commercials aren't going to draw in an appreciable number of new fans. Well if you're point is that non-fans aren't going to see it any differently no matter what...WHY NOT give the 'loyal' fans something entertaining. And I don't belive you can use the...It's not entertaining arguement, because well, just look in this thread, people laughed. I'm OK with giving the fans an entertaining commercial. I just have a problem w/ people claiming the commercials are going to draw in new fans or get people to order the PPV. And I never said they weren't entertaining. I quite enjoyed the HHH/Braveheart commercial.
-
NBA Live 2005 needs technicals and flagrants.
Spaceman Spiff replied to The Czech Republic's topic in Video Games
Rasheedometer? -
Again, the fact that the story is also about how we're just now finding out about it, today in the year 2005. Kind of like if we found ruins of an ancient alien civilization on the moon it'd be a current event, despite the fact that the aliens left them there thousands of years ago. Again, a plan that was REJECTED before it was even seriously considered is considered current events or even important how? -=Mike It had the written approval of all the Joint Chiefs of Staff! Whether it's current events or not, it's still a pretty scary story. The dateline on that story is May 1, 2001.
-
But the main point remains: people are going to plunk down $50 (for WM, $40 for non-WM's) for a PPV (and, if you're talking non-fans, a PPV for something you don't even watch) based on seeing a funny commercial? Seeing a serious wrestling commercial or seeing a funny wrestling commercial isn't going to matter to people who already view the product as a joke. You can't compare it to other companies using funny ads, because they're just going for name recognition. Most people already know about the WWE, so if they're not already watching, the commercials aren't going to matter. These commercials are really only playing to the existing fanbase, not to non-fans. If you want to make that argument (giving your loyal fans a laugh), that'd be fine. But these commercials aren't going to draw in an appreciable number of new fans.
-
Shane doesn't want anything to do w/ the creative side of WWE. He's perfectly happy running the new media stuff (I think that's what he does).
-
Dikembe Mutombo Mpolondo Mukamba Jean Jacque Wamutombo (your last name)
-
For the handful of those who care, Pearl Jam should have an album out this year, followed by a tour.
-
When that dude was peeling off his face in Poltergeist. That freaked me out as a kid.
-
Yeah, this match is going to be pretty bad. Putting that aside, though, Orton wins w/ a schoolboy? Unless they're going to play the concussion card again, I don't get why Tomko isn't eating the RKO (and I don't even like Orton).
-
RVDFan420
-
So this kid in my dorm died last night.
Spaceman Spiff replied to Edwin MacPhisto's topic in No Holds Barred
-
Gold.
-
Show vs. Bashams was pretty "meh", but I thought the spot w/ the chair towards the end was pretty cute. 1 Basham almost hit the other, then turned around and had the chair punched into his face. That got a laugh out of me. I also like Jindrak faking the 3rd elbow drop before gyrating.
-
WWE to announce 2005 Hall of Fame inductees
Spaceman Spiff replied to spman's topic in The WWE Folder
Rick Martel? Life long mid-carder. Too many better options before he should get there. Try again in 20011. Koko B. Ware? A low card comedy act? WTF? Dude, you have John Tenta on your list, for no other reason that he's sick & happens to be a nice guy. -
Well, Brit Hume mentioned on Fox that Clinton got boo's from Republicans during 1 of his SOTU's.