Rob E Dangerously

It surprises me that Switzer is a Democrat (well, sort of.. more of the moderate/yellow dog type of Democrat).. but it appears that Brad Carson got an endorsement from one of the more esteemed figures in his state. And a good soundbyte too since Coburn is claiming Carson is a liberal. Coburn is also claiming that his race against Carson is a battle of "good and evil", which means that Coach Switzer has been recruited by evil. (as for previous statements, Switzer endorsed Brad Henry, a Democrat, for Governor and Henry beat Steve Largent, along with John Edwards, who lost the Oklahoma primary by just 1216 votes to Clark.) For some of you, this could reinforce the idea that Switzer is a criminal (ha), or a bad man. But, even if Carson could lose Stillwater, it doesn't hurt to have this endorsement in Oklahoma.

idk.. you have an advantage on limbs and all.. but Cleland has a shot

sounds like a gay porno movie Never seen a gay porno movie, so I'll bow to your expertise. -=Mike could have been worse, it could have been been a video of you fighting Max Cleland

sounds like a gay porno movie

it's like "My Two Dads".. they both have a daughter.. or something

I guess "blah blah has an idea" or "blah blah has a strategy" isn't hard-hitting enough

Mike.. you forgot to blame the DNC for people tearing up the signs of little girls, and illiteracy. Everybody would love Bush if it weren't for the DNC.

Kerry's also inconsistent, and consistantly wrong then again.. "My opponent says he has a plan for Iraq. Parts of it should sound pretty familiar -- it's already known as the Bush plan." "In Iraq, Senator Kerry has a strategy of retreat; I have a strategy of victory" (math says: Kerry plan = retreat + Bush plan, Bush plan = victory + other good stuff. Then again, this is from a President who has run up the deficit and calls his opponent a "Tax and Spend Liberal".. as if Bush didn't spend enough so far) what is the deal with all these politicians using the "[My name] Plan" term? it seem more constant than in previous elections. Even the Republican running for Congress has her "Patterson Plan".. we're the victims of a plan epidemic here.

aw yes.. the paranoid "Cheney didn't preside over the Senate" conspiracy. Granted.. how the hell that would be a conspiracy.. I don't know. Cheney probably got the Queer Eye guys to make over Ted Stevens so he looked like Dick Cheney, or something

One more thing about Edwards attendance. It's a shame there isn't an online monitor of this (that I know of) but his record before 2004 (or this session) was good. His current record may not be too bad, but I don't know what his 79% attendance record is really like compared to others

usually bills which are voted down by a margin of 400 votes are brought up as a show. Unless i'm missing the session of Congress where they vote down all the stupid bills that they kept dead for 18 months

he already made several references to that. I mean, it's not like Cheney said that he took the initative in creating the Internet or anything like that. On further checking, Cheney presided over two Tuesday sessions since 2001. Edwards presided over two Tuesday sessions as well. But, that does back up the idea that Cheney shows up and hangs out with Republicans, which would make it a bit hard for him to meet Edwards. Granted, Cheney's sense of humor is very dry too, so it's probably not extraordinary that he slips from "joke" to "serious" without anybody noticing.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134589,00.html

where's the love for Genocide?

Perhaps we could photoshop Kerry's head over Dukakis and just run the Tank commercial again. You never have seen the Kerry/Dukakis ad i've mentioned.. "HE'S BACK" as the Dukakis image morphs into John Kerry

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/polisci/pollac...ommercials.html (including one of the Feingold ads) http://www.citypages.com/databank/23/1143/article10840.asp (the Wellstone ads are on the bottom) I'm pretty sure the Wellstone/Ventura agency wouldn't quite work in a national campaign.. but you never know My Kerry idea is a bit more mean. Get the clip or footage from the Bush 78 ad of him jogging (if possible/legal).. go over the negative parts of the record then mention something with his attacks.. and.. "With a record like that, you'd be running from it too" and also destroy all footage of Kerry running (just in case.. ha)

for the Presidential race.. nothing stands out as being noteworthy from either side. Missouri doesn't seem exciting enough to warrant unique ads either. How about in your areas? there has to be some interesting ad or something. (is sorta OD'd on politicial ads after seeing a video filled with them for one of his classes. Including the Wellstone ads from 1990, the Feingold ads from 1992, Strom endorsing Dole for President (1988), a "game show" anti-David Duke ad (with stuff like "Was caught selling Nazi books out of the basement of his office" "Who is David Duke?".. nothing like kicking a guy who doesn't have a real shot. Like LBJ did with Goldwater), Michael Dukakis turning into John Kerry (1990 ad) and other local things) anything?

http://www.advocate.com/new_news.asp?ID=13949&sd=10/06/04 It's a sign James.. it's a sign.. or he tried to mosh for the Lord

Not much, actually. wow.. such restraint.. I'm sure the directors cut is full of Hillary-arity

this is more of an idea of mine. But currently China and Tonga have the same say on the General Assembly. So I worked on an idea for a House of Representatives-esque chamber. But one problem is that it'd be massive. So maybe this works. http://www.geocities.com/bigredrbh/un.htm 925 seats country population divided by 5 million. But with a cap of 47 (to stop China or India from dominating, under the formula, if there was no cap, then China would have 259 seats) There's 191 countries in the UN. Taiwan and the Vatican are not members. Palestine isn't either, but for the purpose of having an odd number of members, they're included. But you can overlook that. # of reps: 1 - 100 countries 2 - 26 countries 3 - 12 countries 4 - 7 countries 5 - 7 countries and so on.. it is a bit skewed though. It could use some work or weighting. then again, it also gives Bangladesh a lot of seats too So, which group or country would strike down this idea first?

Judge, they're clearly standing. Ya know. It looks like Edwards is eyeing Cheney's meal too

I think "Headmaster of Spin" is one subtitle for the chairmen of both parties. You gotta put a positive face on a situation no matter what. Even if it may seem delusional. Clearly, Edwards is ignoring Cheney in the pictures

Not that it matters, but since i've done volunteer work for the Kerry/Edwards campaign, I decline to really make much of a comment on this debate. More than likely, Cheney won. But the "Don't vote for A (Pres candidate) since B (VP) is bad" thing doesn't work either. Edwards has steps to take on foreign policy. Fun fact: Cheney met Edwards at a Prayer breakfast. I guess Senator Edwards didn't make a lasting impression on the Vice President. Or Cheney was exaggerating.

You mean you haven't heard of oilwater? it's big in Oklahoma.. like the derrecks (sp?)

John Murtha (D-PA) and Pete Stark (D-CA) voted for it Charles Rangel voted against it. Yes, he voted against a bill that he sponsored Out of the 14 co-sponsors, 13 could vote, 12 voted against it, Corrine Brown didn't vote