Prime Time Andrew Doyle

Brisbane will not make the finals, we exposed their weakness on saturday night. Run them off their feet, win the center clearences and disrupt the delivery to Brown (It also helped that Brian Harris has grown to the point where he can take him). This game at the 'G this Saturday will be a good barrometer for both the Bulldogs and the Eagles. For the Doggies it will show if we can match it with the big boys and possibly make a run at September action, and for the Eagles it will be their last match against a real quality outfit on the ground they will need to play on in the Grand Final. I was at the Collingwood game in Round 9, and they did not play that ground very well. Collingwood chased them all day and if we can do the same thing then it is very possible that the Doggies can pull off a great win. Yes, it is way more enjoyable to play then rugby. It takes a bit more endurence to run out the full 100 minutes. On a side note, what do you guys think about the Chris Tarrant incident on the weekend. I was at that game and the way he was being held was absolutly ridiculous. Even though he is a crack head, the umpires were shocking and should not do another game for the rest of the year. If I were him I woulda had a swing at Carr because when it gets to that point enough is enough.

The shooting of the wrong person is bad for two reasons. Firstly a innocent life has been taken, but it could also stop officers from shooting a real terrorist because they fear it may be the wrong person, and in the split second they take to make that decision the terroirst may escape, or even worse, set off an explosive.

Thats what makes it so hard to defeat terrorism.

Oh My God, not THEE XMV camera, stop the fucking press. But seriously, what a fucking pussy.

I reckon Lil' Naich should take over Hebners spot

Simple answer, no and nor should they

It seems as though bombs were meant to go off, but there was a problem with the detonators(sp?).

Source <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Sounds gay. I don't get why artists feel the need to be "reborn". Unless he is going to become a Country & Western singer, he is still gonna be the same old rapper, rapping about the same old things.

Add me to the waiting list if you don't have to pay this year. I don't got the cash to even waste 5 bucks on this.

Somebody tried an Asshole chant on in another thread, so I will try and start an Aussie chant in this thread AUSSIE, AUSSIE, AUSSIE, OI,OI,OI edit: The answer is yes, Australia can do it for the 10th time

Not afraid of my own shadow, but certainly a bit weary when ever I am in a heavily populated place or on the train. I catch it to Uni every morning and you just can't help being somewhat suspicious of some people, or even innocent looking things. For example, today after Uni I saw a packed sports bag sitting by itself in a railway underpass and I went to the police station (luckily it was in walking distance) just to let them know. I'm assuming it turned out to be nothing, but after last week, you don't feel like taking any chances when you see something like that Don't forget us Australians, we are probably higher on their shit list.

Bump

London Bombs Likely Simple and Homemade Scary stuff. What a fucking world we live in.

But its fun to argue with him. Whenever he gets into a argument in which he has clearly lost, its fun to watch him make like a 8 year old who has been caught red handed and keeps on changing his story to get out of it, only digging himself a bigger hole

Doesn't make any difference

I have used examples in that text to show how I have come up with what I believe the tone of the article. You believe differently, but the minute you get close to the point made by me, you go off on a tangent about commies and hippies and the like and abandon any hope of sticking to the point. When I said prove it, I meant using examples form the text how you came to a different conclusion. And yes he is a moron, or something much worse, a person who twists the facts to suit his own twisted beliefs Nah, just the obvious that seems to escape individuals such as yourself. Arguring with you is a pointless endeavour since you really don't have a grasp of world affairs and can't even come up with reasons as to there is such resentment that propels such terrorism actions other than 'they're evil'. I am pretty sure that the people who would have carried out the attacks on London where not Iraqis or Afghans. Don't sprout that bullshit because it doesn't fly. If your gonna use that excuse, and say that these attacks happened because of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan (sp?), then the perpetrators must be from those countries, because if not then that reason is just rubbish.

You say that, yet you prove no evidence to counteract what I have said, I wonder why, could it be because you are wrong. BTW Don't go talking about peoples head. You have proven time and time again what a moron you are whenever the subject of the U.S and the Iraq war comes up. No matter how outlandish the claims may be, you are determined to beleive the worst when it comes to Bush and the U.S.

By posting that crap, thats how I came to that conclusion. That artcile IS justifying the bombings. It is saying, "Oh well, they went into Iraq, they paid the price, bad luck". You agree with the article, which justifies the bombing, which killed innocent people, meaning you justify the killing of innocent people. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Second: None of what you bolded justfied the murder of innocent civilians. It's merely presenting reasons and rationale as to why they occured. England and Spain did pay the price, unfortunatly. It dosen't mean it was right for them to be attacked, especially innocent civilians that had nothing to do with their countries foriegn policy, but the actions of sending troops to bomb the Middle East obviously have adverse effects. And no, it dosen't mean they are right. I believe their reasons for hating nations like the US are justified for a variety of reasons, the big one currently being the war on Iraq. However, it does not excuse their actions. Let me re-iterate before others jump on me for this like last time: No act of terrorism is justifiable, whether it be coaltion bombs raining over Afghanistan or Iraq, insurgent bombs going off in the streets of Baghdad, or the atrocities committed yesterday in England. Whatever the motive, the wanton killing of innocents is not something I condone. It's absurd that I even have to spell this out for you. Reading comprehension. Learn it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You talk about reading comprehension, how about the tone of an article. Anybody who does not have their head up their ass (obviously you do not fall into this category for obvious reasons "No act of terrorism is justifiable, whether it be coaltion bombs raining over Afghanistan or Iraq...") can clearly see that he is justifying the attacks. "OBL said you bomb us, we bomb you, there you go", the talk of them paying the price e.t.c is clearly justifying it. These sentences on there own may not be justifying, but in the context of that article and the tone in which it was written in shows that he is justifying the actions. But as I pointed out earlier, this guy has no fucking clue, his comments about the Bali bombing prove that.

Your goddamn right that I'm saying that. By posting that crap, thats how I came to that conclusion. That artcile IS justifying the bombings. It is saying, "Oh well, they went into Iraq, they paid the price, bad luck". You agree with the article, which justifies the bombing, which killed innocent people, meaning you justify the killing of innocent people. edit. The Bali bombings were in 2002, BEFORE the war in Iraq started. Isn't that amazing that the australian people paid the pirce before the Iraq war started. You might wanna check the facts of the people you quote before posting them.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}> So in other words you are justifying innocent people being killed. No suprise there.

To kill as many innocent people as they possibly could, because they are terrorist fucks.

I've noticed recently that I have been getting a lot of flash popups and I was wondering if it has happened to anybody else and or if they know of a program or a way of getting rid of them

If only it could have stayed like that Seconded

You would assume it was not the IRA. If that Secret Organisation of Al-Qeada arent the real culprits, would you think it would be sfae to assume that it was the real al-Qeada? And if so, would they claim responsibility, because if I remember correctly, didn't it take a while before bin Laden came out and definatley say that it was them.

A press conference is about to held quite soon which should shed some light on the amount of casualties