chaosrage

Bad idea. That would be like asking random people in the crowds. Everybody will just put their favorites down.

I think it was the opposite. I KNEW rock was winning because the score was already 3-0 and Austin already won the title against Rock in the ME of WM.

K, I googled second minus world and that's the only site it came up with. Apparently it was posted on april fools too. And this is how myths get started.

...I don't think the second minus world is real. We would've heard about it before now.

Is there a reason not to have it? It's not like you have summons at the beginning.

Fucking late 97/early 98. This has been proved wrong so many times. Just read some posts from this week.

Magikoopa is in Mario Kart 64. Something to do with a thromp in Bowser's Castle. I believed it too. I mean why the fuck is there a thromp in a cage?

Who is he and what did he do to get banned for the first time? So I can defend him too..

That's what I meant. Everybody can use cure and fire as early as the Wall Market. If you get it leveled up with one character, why wouldn't you with the rest? At least with materia, you have to master it to have two or three characters with it, which takes a while.

Well I haven't played the game in 6 years, but as far as I remember, you didn't have to level up to use Fire and Cure.

That's FFX. Magicite is just as bad as materia. Or worse if that's possible. And everyone is a blank state. It's just as easy to learn Ultima with Gau as it is Terra, and about as effective.

Why wouldn't you? You can just buy all the cure and fire materia you want in shops. Yep, FFX is easily the best FF gameplay wise. No comparison there.

I hope I don't have to take calculus 2 again. That would suck... a lot. I recommend not picking CS as a major.

Is this high school? 10 pages on what?

You can make VII like that too, it's just up to you who has the steal materia, who has enemy skill and who has slash-all or whatever. That's the problem. Every single character can do everything. In FF6, you have to make do with what you have. You can't just laugh and switch the skills to whoever you want. You'd think so, but more options really take away from the strategy because it doesn't limit you as much. Since every character can do EVERYTHING you want them to do, it doesn't take as much effort to stay alive. It lets you turn them into gods. FF4 leaves you with the disadvantage of not everyone being able to cure and not everyone being able to attack. Each character has strengths and weaknesses. Sometimes you won't even have a white mage or black mage in your party. Or they'll run out of MP or die and then you'll be screwed. One character will have to use a life potion if you have any and another will have to use a cure potion if you have any and maybe another. Then you have to think about if you should even use a turn to use life since they might kill her as soon as she comes back when you could be curing somebody else or attacking. For FF6/FF7, all you do is use life2 with anybody. If a monster is weak against fire, well use Fire for everybody! You don't have to worry about silly things like fire and ice weapons. Like someone else said, they could have easily made it where Barret's cure magic was much less effective than Aeris's, and Barret could have had strong weapon skills that Aeris would've been able to use. And someone could have had strong attack magic that no one else could use. Everyone shouldn't be able to use the best spells. Just so they would all be different and useful. It doesn't make a tiny bit of difference if you stick with the same three characters the entire game because they're all identical. Where's the strategy in that?

One more comp sci...

Just like Bret Hart leaving, Diesel leaving, Scott Hall leaving, and Nitro starting to pick up might've had something to do with 1996 buyrates. See this is why you have to look at more than just who main evented a show. If that's all you go by, then you have to admit Bret is the worst draw ever since Bret/Bulldog did worse than HBK/bulldog. Hell, HBK/Undertaker did better than Austin/Undertaker. And HBK/Diesel in shitty 1996 did better than Austin/Foley from Over the Edge 1998. I agree, but I think HBK is a draw just due to the fact that he didn't sink the WWF in 1996. He was all by himself, and ratings/buyrates didn't drop any from 1995. Besides, look at how ratings jumped in late 97 when he was at the top.

I'm not a big fan of VI's gameplay either, but at least Locke stealing, and Sabin's blitzs, and Cyan's swordtechs, and Strago's lore set them all apart from each other. You had set classes for 9 and 10 too, and they still gave you some freedom with it. In 10, you could break out and change classes if you really wanted to, but that would take a lot of extra work.