

KTID
Members-
Content count
879 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by KTID
-
The only petty thing in the report that I can condone is hating Zach Gowen. The boy is a bitch.
-
Brand new WWE news and notes from the Observer
KTID replied to Dangerous A's topic in The WWE Folder
You forgot: 3) Screwing powerful "higher-ups" 4) Being friends with long-time employees. Oh, wait...those can't help him in HOLLYWOOD. MWAHAHAHAHAHA. -
High school? Try friggin' play school.
-
Brand new WWE news and notes from the Observer
KTID replied to Dangerous A's topic in The WWE Folder
...well, this ain't ballet. -
Brand new WWE news and notes from the Observer
KTID replied to Dangerous A's topic in The WWE Folder
Dear lord. -
Sarcasm? How's a 'rasslin fan s'pose to understand sarcasm?
-
chaosrage, I had never even thought of that until now.
-
Maybe because he was the only big name still around besides the Undertaker? That might have something to do with it. Bret Hart left to go and find his smile. Diesel left. Razor left. Anyone else noticed this? Is this a typo? Is it just really humourous irony?
-
...can't say i'll miss it.
-
I am of the belief that if a wrestler wins the title and then drops the title within a period of say 1/2 months and ratings remain the same then said wrestler can not be labelled either "a success" or "a failure". If said wrestler increases ratings (constantly, not just a one week bump) then they are "a success", however, in order to be called "a failure" one must either cause ratings to drop, or fail to increase them after being given a long and credible run as the *top guy* in the company.
-
False, Nash was the worst, closely followed by Michaels. Sid never did any harm to numbers (lets face it, he was never given the opportunity to).
-
Why are you guys *STILL* arguing with these idiots?
-
Remember this is WWE we're talking about But WWE haven't done or even suggested doing this angle, its just everyone on this board suggesting they put all their Japanese wrestlers together in a stable, which is stupid. If WWE did it, they would be stupid. As it is though, its only you guys suggesting they do it you're all being stupid.
-
Ok, "where he belongs" was harsh. BUT It is not jobber hell to be in a "wildcard match" as the one at SS '95 was not a jobber match although it had some "lower" wrestlers.
-
You are all aware that wrestlers don't have to be in a stable together just because they come from the same country.
-
It's not jobber hell, its "midcard" which is where Angle belongs.
-
Then why is Steve Austin the most pushed guy on either roster?
-
As long as he just keeps entertaining me, while getting a pay check from WWE, i'll be able to put with it for another 8 months.
-
A PROPER MATCH?!?!
-
He was one of the crappy UPW guys in California. Of the guys picked up by WWE, some have made it (John Cena, Victoria) and others, well, haven't (Nathan Jones).
-
(in childish voice): HE STARTED IT!