rising up out of the back seat-nuh

While Blazing Squad go on to have long and prosperous careers

^got me love with his avatar prompting < wants to know what TPFKATLPE means

S Club Juniors are brilliant, goddammit! New Direction is the greatest pop song of all time, and the new one (Fool No More) is pretty swish too.

Roll Me In Cotton, by the masters of indie Ooberman

One thing WJM: Blazing Squad? Really?

Yours was the one name I really wanted to know where it came from. Chave is my nickname, and what everyone knows me as. It means "to steal" or "a thieving little kid". I am neither, but I looked like one 9 years ago.

The chave diatribe~! I think that WWE will put the belt on Hardy. Most people think that Benoit will lose to Hardy by Rhyno interference, yes? That means that Hardy has fluked his way into the final. Fast forward to Vengence. Hardy cheats to beat Gunn. And, on the way, him or Moore does something "heinous" to Torrie to get heel heat. This sets up a nice little feud with the vanilla face Billy trying to get the belt he deserves (which gets no crowd reaction) and get Hardy back for harming Torrie (which fans WILL give a shit about) Go to SummerSlam, Gunn beats Hardy in some sort of gimmick match, wins the belt (which has gained in profile after being held by Hardy), gets revenge for Torrie and gets more over. Kinda like what they did with the Booker/Christian feud, only better. However, I am not a WWE booker....

Turn Jung Dragons Australian, and put the team of Luger and Eric Angle with Triple A and have a Dragons/Luger&Angle feud for the tag belts. RATINGS GOLD, I tells ya!

Yeah, the Styles Clash '03~! from the week before last. Also, I'm the reigning champion at cat buckaroo! Greatest. Game. Ever.

And of course the best way to stop people from doing this is to make it public knowledge. Surely forrest fires could be started by any single individual, no?

Damn, that belt was vacated a hell of a lot.

Thank God Hogan quit, other this whole scenario would probably have rumbled on untill SummerSlam. As it is, Vince/Gowan looks like the blow-off. Would it have been so hard for WWE to bring in Gowan the same way as TNA did? At least then, he'd have some longivity, and get over before you put him into the top-line mix. HA! SD is on now and they just showed Stephanie spearing Sable. Fucking hilarious.

I was student of the month at my school in May 1996

Well, that clears that up then...

There are troops from other nations in there. And Iraq doesn't need any more troops occupying it.

Velvet Underground: Sunday Morning

Who the fuck is Sammy Sosa?

On this point our opinions differ. I'm not obliged to present both sides of every debate I enter into. I argue for the side I believe is right. If you feel differently, you are entitled to argue for another side. Don't bitch at me for choosing one. Good. Theologians in general are a waste of perfectly good skin. (This comes from someone whose father-in-law is a Baptist minister, and he feels exactly the same way.) No. Because the argument I would make has been made before, and it has been expressed better than I could express it were I to try. People quote others all the time. I don't know why you have such a problem with it. Thank you. All I wanted to know was why you used that quote.

Goddammit Dames, you'd make a great goth.

You get SPRUNG!

Yeah. Why is your hand slowly creeping towards your dick in that photo?

Am Dag and Daniels are the only indy stars who I can see WWE signing, Am Drag for his Michaels connections, Daniels because he's getting on a bit, and might like one last shot at the big time.

You're a flaming idiot. Have I banned him? No. I can't. Criticism does not equal persecution. Shut the fuck up, leave your Galahad complex at the window and drive through, thank you. Nope. Can't be disproved. You can't read. The quoted passage says clearly that opinions are not immune to criticism simply because they are opinions about religion. Fucking shut up already. I don't know why the hell you think posting a mean message to someone is "persecution." Whiny little prat. Oh I'm so sorry, I didn't know everything I post here had to be rewritten in my own fucking words you bloody dipshit. When the fuck did you become my goddamn middle school English teacher? Fuck off and take your inane condescension and infantile allegories with you. Cool, I've been Marney'd I understand completely what you were trying to say with that quote, but the quote you used wasn't the best. The quote you gave was in direct response to the statement "If SP wants to come on this message board and post without getting his faith torn apart, then he should be able to." and was, as a result, an arguement of the point that SP should be able to have his faith torn apart. My reply to this was that as a result, atheism should be equally argued against, and that the quote you gave was an atheist equivalent of the things you disliked in SP's posts. And whatever way you look at it, the quote you gave was very dissmissive of theologists and at times quite condacending. If you feel like the word persecution was too strong, feel free to replace it with the word criticism, but I would have thought the jist of my point would have come across to you of all people. And I still don't understand why you used that quote instead of saying the same things in your own words in half the time? To sound more intelligent? To make your argument sound more valid?

<is gonna do what ^ said now!

^has a better avatar than he used to