rising up out of the back seat-nuh

I still like TYO's, but more for nostalgia than anything. Thet aren't as funny as you remember (and at times cringingly cheesy), but if they're cheap, you could do a lot worse.

Or his other arm has been shot

D'ya reckon? I tried the album, but it just didn't do it for me. The singles cast too big a shadow over the rest of the album. PS Who produced Crazy In Love? Common sense would say The Neptunes, but I wanna make sure.

You RACIST~! Yeah, and the rest

This is the silliest thread I've ever read. I was going to go into a list of reasons why, but I think you already know.

Annother couple: Manic Street Preachers: Take The Skinheads Bowling and Raindrops keep Falling On My Head Hi Standard(sp?): California Dreaming

Say a squirrel shot you.

Why does that make them "Bridge and Tunnel" girls, though? What does it all mean?

For those of you who like the album, or ATDI, or just want to see what the fuss is about, I strongly reccomend seing TMV live. I've just got back from their show in Portsmouth, UK and they were absolutely stunning. Omar is the greatest guitarist I've seen play live.

The one thing i notice about Family guy is that almost every episode, at least in the first two seasons, seems to be a direct copy of a Simpsons plot-line, only done better.

Why does everyone immediately assume that the war on Iraq was justified with or without the threat of WMDs? i have seen no reports that quality of life has not improved to any large degree in Iraq, and, as yet, no concrete proof has been given that Iraq posed a threat to American security. How is this war in Iraq justifiable when there are many nations worldwide equally deserving of humanitarian aid?

Yeah, Crazy In Love does it for me too.

Yeah, I'l take the blame for that.

It would have been great if HHH had lost the title to Maven on Heat. Just imagine the sheer non-sensicalness of it

Hopefully Xian will gett the belt back at SummerSlam. He makes a good heel champion...

Godammit, the UK could whip the USA's ass any time! Or not, as the case may be. So why does the USA need to be stronger than the rest of the world? All it takes is for one nationalistic fuckhead to come into power, spin some shit about the US being greater than any nation in the world, start a few wars with countries that he doesn't like the look of and *BINGO* WWIII and nuclear holocaust time. That scares the fuck outta me

One of these men is a suspected drug user. Try and guess which one!

In terms of technology? Yes, without a doubt. In terms of quality vehicles and weapons/equipment? Yes. There's no way we could match their quantity, though, should it ever come to that. A hundred crappy tanks and 10,000 stupid men is still 100 tanks and 10,000 men to deal with. There are some advantages that sheer numbers gives you. There are no advantages that sheer numbers give you. In modern warfare numbers give you logistics problems and nothing else. The only exception is when you're trying to take and hold a country, and since America is more than self-sufficient we'd never need to do that. We could utterly destroy the rest of the world in a matter of weeks if we chose to, and there's no force under heaven that could stop us. The rest of the world should get down on its knees and thank God we're not like them. How the fuck do you work that one out? Are you honestly saying that you believe that the U.S.A could take over the world if it wished?

Radiohead covering Winter Wonderland is both brilliant and hilarious.

I really hope Cameron doesn't win. The guy is way too creepy. Seriously. If he gets evicted, then he'll spend his last hour in the house killing everyone.

I would like to stick up for the British troops, but I fear that we are indeed a distant second to the Americans. The S.A.S are, however, the equal of any American troops, and have played a vital part in the war in Iraq. A question for Tom, do you believe that the U.S army is greater than the combined armies of the U.N?

Sorry dude, I didn't know it was on your own webspace. Dutifully changed.

Curse you! Oh well, i guess if anyone was going to know, it would be you. Well done.

Actually, we are. But the reason I suggested what I did is because I want to see if the UN, an organization rendered both impotent and unimportant by the whole Iraq situation, can step up and do something to show relevance on the world stage without any involvement from America. My money's on NO, but I'd at least like to see them try. The USA trying to act independantly from the UN is one thing, but the USA is an integral member of the UN. Whatever happens in Liberia, the USA are going to have to be involved in it. And why, apart from the missions in Iraq, shouldn't the US be involved in Liberia? Other countries had troops fight and die there, would you grant them special status? And why exactly couldn't the UN carry out action without the US? The point of the United Nations is to provide a group of nations attempting to prevent genocide and the like, is it not?

As much as I hated Fat Bastard, he is the charachter I quote the most.