Slickster
Members-
Content count
3425 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by Slickster
-
I think he was having contract problems during that time or something. Right...the game's roster was finalized in early August of '98 and Flair didn't come back until 1 month later. Same reason why the WARRIOR isn't in it.
-
The finish to the 1st one could have been botched, so they brought 'em back out and edited the matches together later on.
-
Wasn't as bad as everyone makes it out to be. I've seen much worse. I thought the match between the two was one of the best that either of them ever put on. I'll admit I mark for Slaughter's top-rope rolling kneedrop.
-
You are my hero!
-
Thanks for the offer, but I'm taking my chances on ebay for belts.... Is it Alliance Edition? Blank nameplate?
-
I fail to see the correlation between having tables and having balls. I guess it's too high-concept for a humanoid like myself.
-
Major League Wrestling is saddened by the loss of Michael Lockwood, known in the ring as Crash Holly, Erin O'Grady, and a few other ring names. Our thoughts and prayers go out to Michael's friends and family. --MLW.com
-
The fight in the Mall where he was chased through the slides and ball pits. Myself, I'd go with the circus brawl with the Mean Street Posse.
-
So what was your favorite Crash Holly moment?
-
RIP Michael Lockwood.
-
Somehow, I doubt steroid abuse contributed to his demise.....
-
check the main page...
-
Oh come on TNM, IT WAS A JOKE!
-
It was a chokehold, and it was supposed to signal a runin from Hardcore Holly. Apparently, he didn't get the memo, and as a result those 2 guys were forced to look dumb and adlib a finish.
-
I was also known as Slickster, if that helps to jog your memory...
-
He's a former AWA World Champion (Dale's AWA, not Verne's).
-
So do I.
-
I was under the impression that the WWE writing team was too damn lazy to write a on screen reasoning so they just made the match and left an actual purpose for the fans to decide. Did they really ever provide a reason for ANY of the old school SurSer matches? 1989 EXAMPLE: Sure, Hogan hates DiBiase and vice versa, but WHY did DiBiase decide to get 4 partners and face him in an elimination match when he could just beat his ass mano e mano in a cage and WIN THE TITLE (his primary goal in the first place)? At least with the Rumble it made sense to have 30 people in the match because EVERYONE wants a title shot @ WM, but what's really in it for you if you're on a team of 4 or 5? Heck, depending on who the opposition tags in/out, you might not even be able to get your hands on who you're feuding with. And who dictates the size of each team, anyway? Why couldn't Andre have insisted on having a team of 6 back in '87? Or did all the WWF wrestlers get a memo from Jack Tunney dictating that they HAD to have teams of 5 and compete under elimination rules? Just some things I've always wondered about SurSer....
-
Osama, you want a duel, you'll get one
Slickster replied to Rob E Dangerously's topic in Current Events
Is it just me, or is that a really lame stip on the Knight's end? I assume that Osama doesn't see some guy who says he's a Knight Templar as "the chief of all crusaders in the US"...that has to be Bush. Plus, even if Osama lost, Al Qaeda would break up and then pretend to join the Knights only to turn on them in a shocking swerve, reforming as Al Qaeda 2: Electric Boogaloo. What else can he put up against the billions of dollars that Osama and his associates have more than his own life? -
One could argue that the music booth is right near the ring entrance so he just cues up the music as they walk by. EDIT:LPYC beat me to it.
-
kane cuts a promo in front of an ambulance and as he talks the picture changes to a first-person shot of someone being put in an ambulance and being attended to by EMTs.
-
Please explain this.