St. Gabe

then stop trying to win

These Sponge Monkeys Love The Smart Marks

At least Kerry actually fired a gun in combat. Also, I'd trust the local newspaper vendor before I'd trust the NRA with any information concerning my vote. John Kerry was in Vietnam? No way! Your vote or John Kerry's vote?John Kerry received an F for a reason. His voting record is with the anti-gun people. WHO Cares about the NRA? The NRA mean nothing. I'd say the same thing about your posts. OOOOOOOHHHH!!! ZING!@!! Go talk to Mike, he's MUCH better at this.

At least Kerry actually fired a gun in combat. Also, I'd trust the local newspaper vendor before I'd trust the NRA with any information concerning my vote. John Kerry was in Vietnam? No way! Your vote or John Kerry's vote?John Kerry received an F for a reason. His voting record is with the anti-gun people. WHO Cares about the NRA? The NRA mean nothing.

Message to Mike: Open mouth, insert foot. (See picture.) Mike, I have some Aloe leftover

...someone get me some Aloe...well played *gracefully bows out*

That quote's goin in the siggy

Being incoherent in your speech, and changing your mind about important issues given new facts arising are not equivalent, try as the conservatives might to make that true. Nice try, weak argument .. again. Having a stance that a barrel full of linguists couldn't begin to decipher is pretty bad. I know, it's nuanced --- it goes from vague to un-fucking-believably vague. Weak, weak defense of your man, there. -=Mike what about his speech is "undecipherable"? are you a retard? Long winded, yes, but undecipherable? If you are used to hearing George Bush speak, hearing a man speak intelligently about anything probably would mess with your head, but I won't fault you for that. It'll be ok, Mike.

Being incoherent in your speech, and changing your mind about important issues given new facts arising are not equivalent, try as the conservatives might to make that true. Nice try, weak argument .. again.

That just made my night

Yep, and it's funny because it's true. Except, of course, that the story was debunked years ago. -=Mike ...Let me guess, you believed that crap, right? It's not that I believe it it's that I want others to, that way people think George Bush truly is close to mental retardation. If it were true, it would explain alot. Well, it'd be interesting --- if it didn't turn out that Bush is likely more intelligent than Kerry. -=Mike Unmitigated bullshit. Oh, and you act like I'm going to be impartial about this. nah. It's more fun to say george bush is dumb because more people will believe you. You sway more votes to our side that way. I am aware of that. Without blatant lies, the Dems don't have a lot in their playbook. -=Mike They really aren't blatant lies, I mean, most people can put semi-coherent sentences together most of the time. I think your president should meet that standard as well. So, in the words of Rudy Giuliani- "Neither Party has a monopoly on Virtue" Liberals on the other hand, have a monopoly on common decency

Yep, and it's funny because it's true. Except, of course, that the story was debunked years ago. -=Mike ...Let me guess, you believed that crap, right? It's not that I believe it it's that I want others to, that way people think George Bush truly is close to mental retardation. If it were true, it would explain alot. Well, it'd be interesting --- if it didn't turn out that Bush is likely more intelligent than Kerry. -=Mike Unmitigated bullshit. Oh, and you act like I'm going to be impartial about this. nah. It's more fun to say george bush is dumb because more people will believe you. You sway more votes to our side that way.

Yep, and it's funny because it's true. Except, of course, that the story was debunked years ago. -=Mike ...Let me guess, you believed that crap, right? It's not that I believe it it's that I want others to, that way people think George Bush truly is close to mental retardation. If it were true, it would explain alot.

Just One That Said YOCUM in big black letters with an Arrow,It's my last name. if you watch raw, look on the right side at the bottom of the ramp 2nd row , we were on tv most of the night, but alot during the 6 way match, Im the tall guy in the maroon shirt, the sign is all over the place too

Well, A friend and I will be going to Raw at The Allstate Arena in Chicago on October 18 (Day before TT) I need sign Ideas, we will be in seats 1 and 2 in the second section back up the ramp, with Aisle seats So our sign will be on TV. I need Ideas. Hence, This Thread. Help is appreciated, so is sarcasm and flaming at times

Yep, and it's funny because it's true.

Ummm...out of curiosity, has anyone here read Lord of The Flies? I see Locke as Simon (The Jesus figure), Jack as Jack, The Fat guy as Piggy. Plus, The wild boar connection really ties it all together. The fact that the black lady hinted at the fact their may be more survivors on the other side of the island really makes it parallel the book. I just wondered if anyone else caught the connection.

news is a social construct, events "happen" news doesn't, it's reported, usually in a compressed, slanted form, and thats why you should check other news sources, if you sit there and eat what the networks spit out you aren't worth a damn, and we would end up electing someone with an IQ of like, 90...oh wait... -Gabe

Not a good one. Keep in mind, one can easily lay the whole "rise of theocratic regimes in the Middle East" on his decision to not back the Shah --- who, while bad, was FAR better than what took over. -=Mike Yes, because theocratic regimes haven't existed in the middle east since, you know, the beginning of TIME. bad example...go fish.

to YOU there are moral issues here. It's a very personal thing, those morals, and when you get into legislating morality it doesn't lead to good things, it leads to discord among those who feel their rights are being trampled. Of course that would give you and Great One more reason to be angry at liberals, so that would be a good thing right?

Tom Daschle is an assclown. He makes me sick. EDIT: And I'm a Liberal

At WHAT rate exactly? You act like this is some slaughter where we're losing a million soldiers every week. And how's it gonna look if Kerry gets in? How's he gonna expand the military when every potential recruit heard his 'Bush=Draft' blather and has basically sworn the military off altogether? Self-fulfilling prophecy. BTW you are aware that the use of reserves and guardsmen didn't just start yesterday, right? Jeez, Calm Down, I was just asking a question man! I'm confused as to how we will fix the problem. Whether it's Bush or Kerry in office it doesn't matter much. Sure, I'd prefer Kerry, but there isn't too much substantive difference in their future "plans" in Iraq. And I don't "act" like we are losing A "miilion soldiers every week". I was simply stating that progress doesn't seem to be moving along at a rapid clip. Mellow Out, It's the Liberals who are angry though, right? G.O.D. And guess what, I was answering. Sure, that's not 'acting like we are losing a million soldiers every week'. You are aware that about 40% of the Army--with all the stretching, you know--is in either Afghanistan/Iraq and all of 2.5% of the Naval Reserve is mobilized. Not exactly 'stretching the military' here. You know for all the whine Kerry does about 'Bush's backdoor draft', who's the one actually MENTIONING it? And you do know that our aim is to train Iraqi forces so that THEY can finish the job right? I'm pretty sure that you just enjoy arguing and being angry. good luck with that

Progress is not going fast. Do I expect it to, No. But how will we supplement the situation as it progresses onward? Try to answer that as best as you can, if you need any further clarification, just lemme know.

At WHAT rate exactly? You act like this is some slaughter where we're losing a million soldiers every week. And how's it gonna look if Kerry gets in? How's he gonna expand the military when every potential recruit heard his 'Bush=Draft' blather and has basically sworn the military off altogether? Self-fulfilling prophecy. BTW you are aware that the use of reserves and guardsmen didn't just start yesterday, right? Jeez, Calm Down, I was just asking a question man! I'm confused as to how we will fix the problem. Whether it's Bush or Kerry in office it doesn't matter much. Sure, I'd prefer Kerry, but there isn't too much substantive difference in their future "plans" in Iraq. And I don't "act" like we are losing A "miilion soldiers every week". I was simply stating that progress doesn't seem to be moving along at a rapid clip. Mellow Out, It's the Liberals who are angry though, right? G.O.D.