DarKnight

Lashley? Do we really need to see him in TNA? And I don't think he has improved like Tomko has either, since I thought Lashley thought about doing MMA, and quitting wrestling. That idea of Christian re-teaming with Edge is a great idea, as those guys the past 3 years have rose to the main event level (even if one was another compnay), and Edge has nothing going on storyline wise, as his feud with Taker is over, his pairing with Vickie is done along with La Familia, and he really has no direction right now. Foley as a commentator in TNA would be good, as is the idea of him being an authority figure, since I have always thought Cornette's character in TNA has been the 2nd worst authority figure character ever (first being Angle as GM in 2004).

I really hope Tomko ends back up in TNA, as I felt sorry for the guy this year with TNA burying him after he was probably the best guy to watch on their shows last year.

The difference with these other guys like Taker, Shawn, Edge, Rey, and Batista, is that they are actually over with the fans to keep getting pushed after being injured all the time, but I don't think Kennedy has any connection with casual fans, so therefore they wouldn't accept a main event push with him at this point.

True

Oh, really? When Cena does return, he will get a pop for about 5 minutes, and then just go back to being booed again, just like the Rumble this year.

In the Name of the King was so bad it was good. I thought Matthew Lillard was so terrible that every line he said had me laughing so hard I was nearly crying. To be honest, I've thought all of Uwe Boll's films are so bad they're good except for Alone in the Dark. Now that folks, was a piece of shit of a film.

If Norman Smiley was on shows, I would want him to get a push, as I have always liked the guy. He would get over huge with fans with his funny act. I don't know why WWE didn't pick him up back in 2001 during the buyout.

I like how people just asume his spot is going to be safe, since lord knows no one else can get over and become popular. I'm one of the few people who thinks that WWE would push CM Punk with the title regardless if Cena was there or not, since Cena hasn't done shit this year in terms of winning matches. There are too many guys that are played out, and fans are just tired of them, and want something new. CM Punk represents something new, and even though WWE hasn't hyped him as a top guy with the title, this is the perfect time to do so. Guys like Cena and Batista have lost so many matches that are important, that they have no momentum to get the title again, and since Orton got his long title reign that Vince wished for years, I don't think he will get it back either when he returns. I don't think WWE can have Cena win the Rumble again, since they destroyed that match forever with that horrible booking this year. In fact, I don't really think Cena will get that big of a pop when he returns, since some fans just won't miss him.

I don't think they could fake a guy's motorcycle accident. I mean, why would they? This doesn't look like a good sign for Cena, since I think Angle in 2005 was also going numb in his hands.

what a bizarre rumor. I mean, I do think Catwoman will be in the next movie, but the Cher stuff is just odd. I do think Johnny Depp would make a good Riddler though, so I hope that comes true. I also think the movie will be called The Caped Crusader too.

Yeah, it made Bane look much more like a badass that he wasn't afraid of fighting Batman in a fair fight. As for Superman's son, that might have been the point that I realized that Superman Returns couldn't have a sequel, other than the fact that it didn't impress people either. When they revealed that his son had super powers, it just seemed so cheesy and unwanted, that I don't think people wanted to see them follow that up. I need to get a box set of the Superman animated series, since I thought it had the best tone for Superman. It was serious, but it wasn't as dark and gritty as Batman.

I'm glad that movie The Rocker tanked. The ads on TV tried to hype it being a sleeper hit. Who the hell would hype a movie being a sleeper hit? I thought every filmaker wished their movie was a blockbuster, then again, its never good for a movie to hype itself as that in ads.

We will probably have Krypton blowing up told in about 5 minutes, and then he lands on Earth, and is found by the Kents, and thats told in about 5 minutes, and then he becomes a reporter, and then becomes Superman, and battles Luthor and Brainiac. I think this would be the right movie to do.

Man, I totally forgot how cool that "Over the Edge" episode was. Come to think of it, I actually liked Bane in the animated series better than the one from the comics, as I liked how he went after Batman when he was healthy, instead of waiting for him to be tired mentally and physically.

Has anyone noticed that Jeff Hardy is always in these goofy posters this year? I remember for No Way Out, they had him underwater with chains, then there was the Mission Impossible WWE magazine cover, and now the No Mercy poster.

From the parts of that series I saw, I liked how it was more violent and serious than the movies were, and you could actually think that Superman might be in danger.

Yeah, I couldn't believe that Fred Durst actually directed a movie. From reading the plot of The Longshots, and knowing that Fred Durst directed it, how could that movie possibly be good?

Was Superman: The Animated Series as good as the Batman one? I've only seen just parts of it, and it seemed pretty cool, but I'm just wondering.

In order to portray hate in a hell in a cell, you have to have blood. Hell, it should be a requirement for the match. I like WWE going to PG rating, since this will prevent them from doing tasteless angles like the Katie Vick crap, and McMahon's bastard son storyline.

Gail didn't have a chance at getting over in WWE since they had her win the women's title in her debut, and someone winning a title in their debut never gets over. It didn't help that she wasn't very good then as well.

Yeah, WWE is obviously better booked in terms of making you care about their matches, but I've always found TNA to be the most entertaining. I am someone who likes matches that have a fast pace to them rather than slow ground based matches. Smackdown the past few weeks have had very slow and boring matches that I don't find entertaining, but then again, I never liked Shelton wrestling as a heel. I will say that Festus/Kozlov was pretty good though.

Yeah, I knew about Butler being in Dracula 2000, Phantom of the Opera, and that Tomb Raider movie, but I had no idea he was in Reign of Fire. I don't think Reign of Fire was as bad as people say it was. I remember it being just sort of a 2 star movie rather than a bomb.

Well, there are certain things about Superman's origin they didn't tell in the first movie, such as him getting his power from sunlight, but otherwise, they pretty much told it all. It will probably be an origin thats told in about 5 minutes or so, then they move on.

Replacing Routh doesn't really matter, because I don't think people are going to have fits over that. I do think Brainiac and Bizarro will be villains along with Luthor in the next movie though, since they had them planned for the Superman Returns sequel. I don't think Warner Bros. is making the next DC movies dark and gritty, but just more realistic and serious. Thats the vibe I had from the new Batman movies, make these characters seem like they can exist in the real world.

I think the Shining was a very good horror movie. One of the few that I consider actually scary and disturbing. Come to think of it, has Kubrick done any normal movie? Dr. Strangleove: a dark comedy about how the world ends, 2001: a very bizarre movie about space, and A Clockwork Orange: a movie about an anarchist. Talk about a weird resume!