Ripper

If they were alive, they would have done a albumtogether eventually squashing the fakest beef in a long time, we wouldn't have to put up with those dumbass "this is what happens when rap gets serious" crap, seeing as Pac stomping Orlando Anderson had absoloutely nothing to do with rap, Jay-Z and Big would have mad songs together, Shyne and Gurella Black would have never gotten deals and The Lox would still be on Bad Boy. And for the love of GOD could people stop saying A: LL is one of the best rappers of all time and B: that he can close to even drawing even with Canibus in their battle. LL raps like a Dr. Suess Book and Canibus destoryed his ass in that "battle". That was one of the most one sided shits this side of Eminem/Benzino.

It doesn't take any more work really. Creating a low res model takes just as much work as making a high res model honestly, seeing as it is a task to keep poly count low. The textures, basically they just won't have to be at such a low resololution so there actually isn't anymore time being invested there. So basically the changes that will take more time is lighting. Yeah...thats about it....lighting.... That shouldn't really be that much of a difference. Unless of course these next gen systems have really complicated programing, but to say that because the games will be prettier will take more time is ridiculous. The difficulty in makeing video games is making crappy models look good. With the next gen, you don't have to use crappy models.

Oh okay, I had to go look that one up. The guy is trying to get rid of abortion and gay marriage so he is basically trying to force someones hand on this one. I mean you would either have to say "Hey, there is no such thing as gay babies" or say "Hey, he's right...stop the abortion" which would mean a ban on all abortions. Cute.

I got stuck here.... um... What the fuck?

Mike isn't Immature. Maturity is forming opinions and clinging to them no matter what.

The thing is, the "but it your stance isn't in the constitution" argument is really weak to me when neither is the other end. I mean you can't say "These judges are wrong for disagreeing with me without constitutional precedent" when the entire issue has no constitutional precedent. Or when its like Mikes case where there is a abortion thread and he will go on and on about how its making up a law and that was wrong, but supports making up a law in the gay marrige thread. I don't see how you can be on both sides of the argument. Either you are against creating law to support opinion or you aren't.

Mike, here is the thing that puzzles me. When state supreme courts rule in favor of gay marraige, they are activist judges and a constitutional amendment is the ONLY way to prevent this, but THIS is different somehow and how DARE the supreme court issue a decision on something that isn't specifically delt with in the Constitution. If we only delt with things specifically mentioned in the constitution, then there are plenty of laws and advancements in this country that would not have happend.

They specifically cited int'l opinion. And they did it in 2002 as well. Even MENTIONING int'l opinion when discussing the American Constitution is ridiculous and shows the Supreme Court is resorting to fishing expeditions to defend decisions that the Constitution does not defend. -=Mike The constitution defends execution before the age of 18? Where? The Constitution forbids it where? -=Mike ...If they had precedent or legitimate reasoning to go on --- they wouldn't have used int'l opinion at all... It doesn't which renders the constitution null and void in this arguement. It doesn't speak to either side, so it can't be used as a determining factor. All that is left is who can make a more conviencing argument.

They specifically cited int'l opinion. And they did it in 2002 as well. Even MENTIONING int'l opinion when discussing the American Constitution is ridiculous and shows the Supreme Court is resorting to fishing expeditions to defend decisions that the Constitution does not defend. -=Mike The constitution defends execution before the age of 18? Where?

Its not absolutly flat out wrong, it differs from your opinon and I am going to go out on a limb and say international opinion was not the basis of the argument for this decision.

Ours was "One Sweet Day" by mariah Carey and Boyz-II-Men. I was like, mutha fuckas, we aren't DYING. We are leaving school. Fuck this place. I told everyone all I wanted to say, and honestly I didn't want those fuckers to hold me and I'm glad they are gone far away, so far away.

Well technical jobs for one, film industry jobs shit...JOBS. Those are reasons that you can't deny would be valid, even if you wouldn't want to go. I am taking exception more to the "Most of the kids in California wanted to go to California b/c "TV says it's cool" or some bullshit like that." when there are obviously loads of reason to go to Cali besides "tv".

*makes this post out of a raw potato and a rubber band*

dude....its southpark.

Actually I can think of plenty of good reasons to move to California. i can't think of one to move to OK. The cost of living is always connected to the chance of prosperity. Atlanta is a great city because the cost of living is relatively low and the opportunity is relatively high. GO ATLANTA AND YOUR MIDDLE GROUNDNESS!!!

On that list, basketball in no way should be over hockey in the "maybe they are on roids" list.

He will be beaten and stabbed in the side with a walkie talkie.

He just couldn't give up the "Bitch Smackin". I mean a man has to hold on to something.

N. Korea and Iran are problems. Sweet-talking them is not going to make them any better. -=Mike There is a difference between being stern and being brash. Being stern isn't sweetalking, but just being "I said give us the nukes BITCH" is about as effective as "Hey, guys, if you don't mind could you think about stopping with the nukes please.." True success is found somewhere in between bitch ass begging and punking the fuck out of someone.

Yeah, my 10 year reunion is next year, and it will be cool to talk about old times, but fuck highschool. Unless you mean I can go back with the knowledge that I have now about life, then hells yeah. i would fuck more(and better) than before, be better at sports, and changed my life. If you mean turn back the clock and know the same shit that I knew then, then no, fuck that. Give me college again. Cause fuck this being grown up and bill shit.

I know it was already mentioned, but since I just saw it the other day, I have to agree with the fight between Preston and Taye Diggs's character at the end of equilibrium. I mean seriously...they hyped it the whole movie and because of the dickitude that Digg's character had you were hoping that something like the end would happen. Oh, and "No......not without incident" and the polygraph line going straight......Mark d fuck out. Equilibrium is the shit.

umm....wha wha WHAT? There are actually apartments left in this country that cost $400/mo for a 3 Bedroom apartment? Hell, out here $400 a month wouldn't even buy a broom closet. Dude, its Troy Alabama. If you are making 8 dollars an hour there, you are into the big money. Everyone is basically making minimum wage. ... Except for the really really rich people that just live there to mock all the poor people.

I have a few photos I took but mostly they are clean walls. I feel old now.

Because moving to a new state doesn't cost money at all... goddamned hippie you.

But seriously, they are going to have to do something to adjust that fucker to the local inflation and cost of living. A nationwide minumum wage that low is just stupid. I mean, you can probably pull that off in my home town (the GOOD apartments cost like 400 for a 3 bedroom.) but impossible in other cities.