RavishingRickRudo

It's my power, it's my pain... ..weep for me.

you WISH. *I* am Choken One. (Wrap your mind around THAT)

you KILLED him??! Diabolical. RIP Dames. You were too good for this world.

What if DAMES *is* BANKY? What if Banky was the one who crashed the board after being banned so that Dames lost power and then started it up with himself under "The Dames"'s name and reinstated himself... THINK ABOUT IT

We're also talking about a station that has Star Trek: The Next Generation as 35% of it's programming.

And that's part of what I liked about it. It wasn't "Taker starts off strong, Cean cheats and gets the advantage, Cena beats down Taker, Taker comes back, Cena cheats again, Cena hits finish, Taker kicks out, Taker wins". They reversed the roles.

Since I don't splooge4Cena, I didn't mind (a)Taker dominating, and (b)Cena losing. I should watch it again.

YES! I agree with the first one! That match blew me away... mainly because I wasn't really expecting it to be that good... also because I was disappointed with the rest of the show and that stood out above it all... YES! Underrated: Taker vs. Cena Vengeance 03. I dug this match more than Benoit/Guerrero and the Tag match (pretty much well because of the same reasons as I listed above). It was different from the usual "heel beats down face, face comes back to win" formula that the WWE loves. Taker beat the shit outta Cena, Cena made the lil comeback, Taker still won. It has some neat psychology IIRC and Taker was feelin it. I should watch it again cause I've only seen it once. I would have put Austin/Rock WM 19 up here as well cause the first time I saw it was was thinkin it was the best match they had yet, but I saw it again about a month ago and it didn't stand up _at_all_.

The WWE hasn't had a good PPV set since WM 19... Meanwhile, PRIDE has the best sets to match their great product. ... just sayin

The change in set and logo reflected WCW's mentality at the time. They changed the way they looked, but not the way they acted. It was still the same show. With the WWE in the mid-late 90's, when they changed their logo and set, they changed their mentality and direction as well.

... It wasn't a very good set.

I like it! Cept for the logo on the back. Spice it up a lil. Maybe some ridiculous logo. But the front is perfect. Very, very, very regular.

At the time, when they changed their set and logo I was like "Ok, this is the end". However, much like how HHH/Angle/Steph was the beginning of the end for the WWE, Sting/Hogan was the end for WCW. Both represented a fundamental issue that either company couldn't fix and it spelled disaster. Often the end is right near the peak. It just takes a while for the effects to be seen.

How about a shirt that says "Wanna get Double Teamed by the Worlds Greatest?"

AS, that's Freedom of Choice for ya.

How about "World's Greatest Shirt" on the Front, and the WGTT logo on the back?

They had a week or two before it totally got ruined

FUBAR.

Taker vs. Brock/Big Show is the worst offender - given that Brock and Show were the champions at the time and that Taker kept on beating them. I thought they did Angle vs. Brock/Team Angle pretty smartly, but it certainly did them no favours. Taker vs. Albert/Big Show was a well worked match. Benoit/Brock vs. Angle vs. Team Angle I can't remember very well.

So again, I state: Can someone track down how many handicap matches were actually won by the 2 (or 3) guys? So far: - Steiner/Test vs. RVD (Raw) *Let's say in the past 3 years.

You are SO right.

TSN does a horrible job with their MMA shows. They are inconsistent at best and the fact that they will put on womens golf and strongman competitions before the UFC or TKO shows makes me sick. It's bad enough that they put it on Saturday at midnight, but they do it so infrequently that you tend to forget about it.

Ricco Rodriguez vs. Andre Arlovski Josh Barnett vs. Semmy Shilt Caol Uno vs. Fabiano Iha

I wouldn't say that Raw vs. Smackdown is "guaranteed money".

So your answer is 1?