Jobber of the Week

Is it really that much worse on Raw? So is Raw's. See Randy Orton and how he's not going to be booked to drop the IC belt anytime soon. Equally predictable.

What in the hell? This started off sounding like your average wwe.com article and then took a smark turn. Is Kevin trying to burn his bridges or something?

Seeing that the Hardy Boyz burned out as far as they could go and the Dudleyz are no longer nearly as big a draw as they used to be with marks, would it be better to move Christian to Raw instead of moving Edge to SmackDown and reform E&C? The SD tag titles are just a realm of absolute DEATH right now and putting some strong heels who we also haven't seen in a while could do a lot to revive the scene. On the other hand, it also means delaying Edge's big push. My arguement to that is that we though we've seen "Edge's big push" several times already and the push never turns out to be as big or as successful as we think it would be. It'd also give Eddie a bit more time at the top while he's a ratings draw. Last time I proposed this question about a year ago (I think) everyone told me that I was off my rocker, so now I'm going to try again. Edge & Christian cocky heel reunion? Please?

Handgun and business restrictions were born out of a church/state issue?

Don't tempt them, my Dad has currently made more process quitting right now than he has... Well, ever since I've been born (and he's had plenty of failure attempts since.) Anyway, one woman in the paper suggested that since the politicians don't care about state law, the citizens might as well just screw up on state taxes or something in their favor. I don't have the article with me, but it was kind of like that.

Turn the text size up so that lower-case is easier to read.

That's another issue that will be decided on early March: http://www.yes57and58.org/ <- Arnold's solution http://www.yeson56.org/ <- The Dems' solution, which is kind of like Arnold's solution but it lowers the amount of votes needed on something to pass to the point that the Democrats can all agree to pass something and the Republicans are made ineffective.

But we don't know if it is! These aren't hardened criminals, these are the guys who have been on good behavior and if anyone acts up, they're immediately kicked out. We have no idea if this actually works or not because the government is making it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Seeing that I thought it finally gave Angle a badass image for one night and was done decently, I was expecting you'd pull out a reason to complain.

Player 1: "I'm going to put two title belts and a hoss on Boiler Room." Player 2:"My turn!" *rolls dice* "Chance! 'Illogical Booking Error in your favor. Cut the legs out of the aspiring main eventer of your choice.'" Player 3: "Better not be me! Better not be me!" *Player 2 grins evilly* Player 3: "Damnit! I swear, everytime I pick the Benoit piece, I never get to win. Gimme those." *Player 3 rolls* "Five. One, two, three, four... Ah no." Player 4: "Looks like you're going to ride the Bradshaw Express! Pay up!"

Damn, there goes my prediction.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...1840EST0177.DTL

Well, if we're heading in this direction, I think Vince should do what Jerry Springer does for his audience. Every year, have a raffle for a new trailer, and hold entry booths at live shows.

No, Billy Beer was dumb. This is... Well... Billy Beer for a new generation.

Yes it is. And before anyone jumps me, I know nothing is illegal and that people don't have to be in this prison if they don't want to. The sketchy issue is that this prison appearantly provides a much better surrounding than the rest of the penal system. That not only means that not only does mean that religious people who choose to go to the "religious prison" are getting far better treatment and accomodations than those elsewhere, but that the state is really sinking a lot of effort into this to make sure that it succeeds and they can crow about what a great boon to society it is.

Fock Beer Drink Fear. I mean, wait. That makes no sense.

This was passed along by a friend. http://www.orlandoweekly.com/news/story.asp?ID=4280 I think this pretty much says everything that needs to be said about "faith-based initiatives."

My guess is after six years of avoiding the guys the RAGE~! has subdued. Unless HHH secretly killed Bret's parents, most people don't hate others with the same ferocity after that long for any rational reason.

I don't even see how this game can be interesting without a cap. It's basically a game of who has the biggest bankroll and nothing more.

Again, your theory works on the idea that there's no such HMO price gouging going on, but there is. Did health insurance premiums remain the same since day one until the big lawsuit boom?

That would probably be the guy you would want to blame for shirking duties. From the state constitution:

EDIT: Nevermind.

I can't avoid the hypocracy. On page 2, you state that helping people is better than hurting people. But you support the plan that hurts people over the plan that helps the people needing helped.

By, George, I think he's got it! But hold on a second! You don't like the lawyers because they make life difficult on doctors. So rather than support the plan that helps doctors, you support the plan that makes life difficult on lawyers. That's not any less destructive. AND, it does nothing to stop the flow of frivilous lawsuits or phony malpractice suits. It simply means less profit is being generated from each one. Which could, in theory, increase the number of phony malpractice suits that doctors face.

Yeah, I saw that, I was merely making an observation.