Jobber of the Week

I don't spend hundreds of dollars on seats, but I ordered so early I got row A seats 1 & 2 in the first non-floor seating. My WM ticket auction shall be paying for this. WHERE IS THE GODDAMN BENOIT MATCH!? SAN FRAN HAS EARNED A WORTHWHILE BENOIT PERFORMANCE, WWE BASTAGES

Oh, Dr. Kennedy is just a ploy. It turns out to be, as in every game, mad scientist Dr. W.J. Clinton. This will cause all the fans of the game to write letters about how stupid it is that Clinton is always involved and why won't he give up and go away already. Clinton won't be involved when the 16-bit game comes out and launches a new spin off, BushManJeb.

I liked Jesse on paper. Never watched his show, but fiscal conservatism + social liberalism = win. I'm guessing and hoping Arnold will do it better though as he has better paid people surrounding him than Ventura did. You have to feel for Jesse, though. He didn't have a recall to take advantage of, and thus he had to run as an independant while claiming to be a populist. This meant that both parties were tearing him apart.

You don't have to go far on the guy's Homestead web site to see that he specializes in dividing our country. His latest title includes "the liberal assault on our schools, faith, and military" which is almost (but, honestly, not quite) as bad as Hannity's title, which says calls liberals evil and puts them in the same breath as terrorists. I'm not beyond some partisan mudslinging myself, but come on. On his front page he places the Bible with the Constitution in importance to our country's history and culture. He discredits people who are against Affirmative Action for legitimate, honest reasons with his rambling about how white straight christian males are some sort of despised society in America, when every average American deals with dozens, hundreds of these people a day. Also, while I'm against giving privelages to illegal aliens, I know that, realistically, we can't deport them all. Let's look at the page now for the Savage Nation book. Here's the opener: Okay, so somehow, these people are more dangerous than Osama bin-Laden? What? There's a lot of liberals in this country I don't agree with. You have to work pretty hard to get me to defend some of the political activists in Berkley, for example. But if you want to tell me they're performing cirmes greater than killing 3,000 people? Anyone who lost a family member or loved one in 9/11 would want to string this guy up by his balls for this comment, and he's only just begun. From a NewsMax interview linked on his site: Oh-kay. I mean, maybe it's just me, but it sounds like he's not really all that interested in hearing both sides of the story. Which isn't saying he's never had a good point, but any good points he has is buried when he says something like this. If I give a clear and concise arguement on something and then say you have a mental disorder for having your political viewpoint, that discredits my entire arguement from an impartial stance. Savage destroys his own points on subjects such as immigration, welfare, and medicating children by name-calling and telling reasonable people that they're part of the problem because they aren't just like him. Ah, okay, so the Jesse Jacksons, Al Sharptons, and other similar self-proclaimed "black leaders" are not responsible for this mess, it's the gay people who just wanted to be left alone. The ones who don't have these crazy personalities. Again, it doesn't help that self-serving idiots like Jesse are carrying the torch to line their own pockets. Gay people don't have a Jesse or Al. Bill O'Reilly believes this, too, and Tom Clancy completely wiped his ass for it. Soldiers are not trained to be policemen. They are trained to shoot people, and only to shoot people. We saw in post-war Iraq how unsuccessful the troops were to keep people from looting and robbing until an actual police force was established. I'm sure there's much more to pick apart than that, but the page of his links is filled with stuff I'm not too well-versed in to dissect (religion), or is just filler such as Savage making complaints that the third season of the Sopranos wasn't as good as the first two. The point is well made that this guy is not exactly the best poltiical or moral compass, and that he actually removes credibility from logical arguement with his insane tripe. And now, I must get up from the computer and return to my life. In the real world, where I'd have to find really hard to find someone who's a bigger threat than Al-Qaeda, and where approximately half of the country in fact does not have a mental disease.

But it sounds like it honestly is! I don't what you're arguement is except "It's about child rape, how can you not want to ban it because it's despicable?" I don't know about that. I think it's appropriate they labeled themselves as a religious group to freely discriminate on religion and sexuality. That was a long time coming and should have been done. What I don't like, is when they whine because they're being treated like a religious organization.

Have you actually seen his show? He starts it off the show by saying "You're about to enter Scarborough Country! No passports required." And then makes a cute joke regarding the main topic of the day. Like "no P.C. Police allowed." Or "no border jumping!" Where have we heard this before? Spoiler (Highlight to Read): "Hold on tight, you're about to enter the No-Spin Zone." Then he goes into a segment called Joe's Real Deal, where he sits and rants about something while the chyron on the right side of the screen paraphrases what he's saying. I guess you could say he's hitting some Talking Points? He also used to run a segment called something like "A Miserable Disgrace", where he talked about The Stupidest Item Of The Day. He fucked himself over here, though, as he featured a company he was suing in that space and didn't mention his involvement to the viewer. I honestly think that Joe is just Al Franken fodder that has yet to reach fruitition. Taking down Scarborough is easy pickings because he's made himself such a clone. Hell, I'm suprised O'Reilly himself doesn't try to take the guy down on the air, except that he risks boosting Scarborough's ratings by doing that.

They're speaking to a crowd of their own. I don't think they needed to convince anyone in that room. This speaks for itself.

Okay. But what am I going to do with this script? *looks at paper, grabs eraser, and rubs out VYCE. Writes in OREILLY* Hmmm..... You know, looking at it, I think this will work even better.

I'm not insulting you. I'm saying we're spending a lot of money and now we're talking about an industry that requires billions of funding without having cut from anything else. Bush didn't say he was cutting from other departments to fund this space announcement, and there's plenty to cut. A study that went up on the Drudge Report about six to eight months ago mentioned that the spending for the other departments in the government, when grouped together, have increased just as much as the defense department spending did! If he announced a money source for this venture, either by cutting other resources or raising taxes, I would have believed him. He did not. From a logical financial perspective, I can only assume it's fluff.

Is that really such an important matter? I can picture it now... SCENE: A dark bedroom. We hear bumping and groaning and from the top of the covers, up pop the heads of VYCE and an attractive YOUNG WOMAN. YOUNG WOMAN: I've never felt like this before. VYCE: I... Oh, I gotta ask you something. YOUNG WOMAN: Yes? Yes!?!? VYCE: *stern voice* Do you support President Bush? YOUNG WOMAN: Well... Ah.... I believed he could have though through his policy a little more thoroughly. VYCE (shouting:) Out, bitch! YOUNG WOMAN: But, but, I just though the Medicare thing was... VYCE: Traitorous lefty scum! Honest Americans support the President's medicare bill! They don't want another 9/11! YOUNG WOMAN: What does prescription drugs have to do with terror? VYCE: Go! Now!

So, you're an Internet Moron?

The Anarchist's Cookbook isn't exactly something most people should be reading either. But I trust it to coexist with our society and for Americans to not build bombs. People who do are going to be doing plenty of time. I don't think that Klan rallies are all that pretty either. Free speech can be a hinderance to a perfect society sometimes, but that's the way it is.

I guess I can't figure out how these celebrities are morons except possibly because they don't agree with your political views. Nice how Drudge didn't bother to transcribe anything but the Bush bashing. This reminds me when he broke news about the Hate Bush Party going on in tinseltown and posted some celeb's cell#, presumably so good ol' republican lovin patriots could air their opinions.

Reports like these are the ones that are pointless. You could do this with just about any jobber. Spread the word! I'm blown away Spanky quit, though. They should have just given him an angle with Shawn. And Shawn's been previously noted as saying he'd do the job if it meant getting him over.

Nonononononono. If I don't get Benoit at No Way Out then there's going to be shit hitting the fan. THE BAY AREA DESERVES A DECENT BENOIT MATCH, DAMNIT. Last time we just got him and Guererro double-teaming Flair.

................

I don't live with him anymore, so I can't just give you numbers, but I do know he sits and downloads from newsgroups at full throttle for a number of hours every night or so. He's not the kind of guy who downloads movies or hosts a DVD-R on his machine for several days or anything. As an outsider, my best guess regarding the kicks is that's directly related to the press release stating that everyone's speed is going up. Which is to say, they aren't actually increasing the payload of the hardware, they're just giving everyone nice theoretical numbers and kicking anyone who makes the most of them. That allows high ad-friendly numbers while keeping the company from having to acutally spend to get them.

Well, based on your details, I'd put that with the flag burning stuff, bomb building materials, and so on. Ugly and low, but restricting it is counterproductive to free society. If you want to go use this material to go fondle young children, however, then we've got a line that's been crossed.

Ok. Well, I can tell you've caught the rhetoric bug. That's nowhere near as bad as giving money to those commiting acts of terrorism. Also, I never actually understood what the connection between these two is. If I just listen to O'Reilly, I get the impression that the ACLU stood up and said that the NAMBLA people have every right to fondle young children. My common sense knows it's not really that extreme. My best guess is there's a constitutional right to speech involved?

Poor comparison. PETA sends money to domestic terrorists.

Too bad his ideas and principles kind of send us back to where we were a few decades ago.

I think Kerry or Edwards is actually not going to appear on the ballot in one important state because not all the signatures were verifiably legit.

We're pumping plenty into our economy. Defense spending, the new medicine initiative that effectively dumps money into the drug companies' pockets, more defense spending, drilling in the protected environmental locations to sell oil, Iraq reconstruction bids going to US companies, more defense spending, missile defense, and did I mention the defense spending?

^^^ This post above made me I goofed. Well, Howard Dean is two first names if you want to look at it like that.

I thought this was already known. Here's another article that appeared in the paper last week with more on this stuff: