Jobber of the Week

Okay, I just sat and read all that, and I've had it. I'm sending this link off to an ex-friend (you all briefly met him when he hijacked my account while I was vacationing and stuff) so he can discuss it with his cronies. I'm sure the shit will hit the fan when he's done reading.

Is that their website, or is this? http://www.difficultteens-tranquilitybay.com/ I can't tell.

I'm not well-versed enough on the subject to say yes or no to that question. I know that some methods are less humane than others, but that's about it. I will say what I do support and that's that I believe that the earliest stages of birth are merely a potential for life, a potential for life and an actual life are two different things that ought to be seperated.

I just said that I could understand it for those living in the affected areas because most of them didn't have the TV news bringing them the latest information. That wasn't a fire. Bloomberg said that plant is designed to release that when it comes to a stop. Oh dear, here we go...

Sorry, that heat had been building during Spicy's posts and I accidentally let it oun you. As for saying that incest babies are "better off dead", actually the idea is that it's the mother's place to make that decision. No, nobody's going to go around saying "excuse me miss, is that an inbred baby? Oh, well, we have to abort it now. Cmon, we're taking you down to the facility." It's obviously a complicated emotional process for the Mom, too. So no, we're not losing all the incest babies for the healthyness of our population's genetics, but giving the mother a choice because it's her body.

A riot doesn't have near the emotional nor physical impact of a nuclear disaster, sorry.

Sigh. You know what other idiot votes for in the interest of his own comfort and beliefs, remaining anti-abortion even in rape/incest cases? That's right: A tip for the clueless: Incest Babies aren't a good thing. They're pretty screwed up developmentally, and that heritage passes onto their children, and so on. EDIT: By the way, you guys better be glad you'll never have to live down the shame of carrying some random rapist's baby.

IMO talking as an armchair strategist, Israel should really learn how PsychOps works and start creating F.U.D (fear, uncertainty & doubt) in Arafat's ranks. The guy IS scum but killing him off makes Palestinians remember his image more fondly than they currently do. Make people want to get rid of Arafat and then propose a deal where the Palestinians finally get to stop being third-world citizens if they hand Arafat over to Israel for capture. After some upheaval and mutiny, he'll be turned over. Unfortunately, this will cause the terrorist cells to come out in full force to try and free him, but this "overwhelming force" strategy hasn't stopped them either. Those guys will simply have to be flushed out the hard way. I'm sure starting up a spy program is a lot harder than I made it sound here, but then again I doubt breaking the PLO's secret decoder rings or whatever is simple compared to what was going on during the Cold War.

I couldn't believe that rational-minded people were thinking terrorists were behind this. I could understand it if you lived in one of the affected areas, lack of information coming in and a pack mentality, etc, but over on Fox News they were speculating like Mujaballi had pulled the plug or something. They even mentioned the recent MS Windows worm. I was shocked they weren't looking up for the black helicopter. Anyhow, terrorist-wise, I couldn't see them doing this. Although nuclear power is safe and responsible, there is a lot more destruction to be gained by doing something at a nuclear plant than just simply shutting off the lights along a coast.

This by itself isn't TOO idiotic, but... So, rather than protecting our own living fully-grown adults, you want to... Oh gee. To take a line from the gun people: When abortions are outlawed, only outlaws are having abortions. I could buy a case for regulation, but... The hell? What about cases of rape or incest?

*slow clap*

They obviously don't want to load too many names on the PPV, because the more people on a PPV, the more Big Checks they have to sign. Don't know if anyone's thought about this, but by having TV-only feuds and angles that hit PPV at their climax, they can have longer angles, rotate the midcard crew, and most importantly have less people to pay for each month's PPV.

It's not so much that I want gay people getting official recognitions (though I do, for equal privelages and all) as much as it is that I have a thing about keeping tabs on the fundies.

Except these guys aren't really legitimate journalists. Unless the Torch is requiring that it's writers get degrees in journalism now and I don't know it.

Well, Mike's comment is the only representative post in this thread of a certain mindset that has popped up in these threads before that Palestinian people are all evil and can never be educated to something different than what they already get. I do not mind Israel kicking ass and taking names, but I don't like them being oppressive while they do it. I also do not like us giving them special treatment above our other allies. "Here, take this large lump sum of money and spend it on your.. Uh... People and culture. Yes, but don't spend it on guns or your military. 'Course, if you do, we aren't gonna bother to check and see, so here." So, Israel killing these cells = Fine by me, but it's not going to reduce violence in any way. Israel killing Arafat = Undecided, but Arafat will just become a martyr and and all of a sudden even Palestinians that don't like him will put a positive spin on him and see him as a reason to hate Israelis. Israel blasting tank shells everywhere and taking out innocents by the truckloads = No. There must be co-existance. Saying "We need to blast them all into pieces before they 'push us into the sea' first" is unacceptable. Note that I am not accusing Israel of taking that last option, but that there are some minds here who think they should.

Thank you for describing this better than I could.

Yeah, but now you have Bush saying "I think we ought to codify that," while Cheney was defending states rights three years ago. Of course, Bush also used to talk about "we shouldn't go around saying 'this is how it's going to be'" either, and look what happened there. Sigh.

It's not that. Or else I'd think Flair sucks for doing so many of the same spots over and over. The problem is that SCSA's moves are nothing special. Jesus, with the exception of bumps and suplexing a heavy sack of shit like HHH, I COULD DO ALL THAT SHIT. I can't believe you guys who bitch about WWE Main Event style go on about how great Austin's matches are. He friggin' personifies WWE Style.

Biggest? Maybe. We had on the west coast a power outage that stretched from San Diego up the Pacific coastline to north of Seattle, maybe into Canada or something. It's certainly not the longest. The Big NY Power Outage of the 60s went on for several days.

Although you personally may believe in the sancticty of life, etc, and not like abortion, you cannot stop all women from wanting abortions by putting your ethical/religious/etc beliefs on them. Outlaw abortion in America, and American women will go to Mexico and have abortions there, with poor medical technology that can damage the mother as well. But some people will go that far for their abortions. So while you may not like abortions, the alternative is worse and involves even more pain and suffering.

I've seen some of the Stunning Steve stuff and it looks like he was good back in the days when he could move and sell. Stone Cold the babyface getting the God Push, no-selling, is horrible. Huzzah, thank god our match was interrupted so Austin could come out and stunner all four guys in the ring, two of the cameramen outside, and five of the audience members by mistake. I've been watching WWF/E since 99 and I've never cared for SCSA's matches from that time period to today. Punch, Kick, FU Elbow, mudhole stomping, stunner, finish. Maybe he'll throw in a suplex or two or the million dollar dream if it's a big match. Whoo. It's better than Fuck Goldberg's TWO MOVES OF DOOM, but that's not saying much.

If he can make a last run, have him win the title at SurSer and then drop it at Rumble to whoever takes it into WM (I'm guessing Kane.)

Guys, the only WMs with the old logo, WMs 15-18, are all avialable seperately. The need to make a 1-14 box and leave empty space for the others. Because you have to buy so many additions, it shouldn't be MSRP'd too expensive. Most people buying one will buying about 6 others as well, and that's $$$$$$$$.

He's on XM Satelite Radio. Channel 166, Buzz XM I'll have to take a listen sometime. I've never bothered to touch that channel except for the occasional John & Ken, and I lost any like I had for them when I saw an email they wrote back to someone.

Ah, it was getting so boring without my usually reliable suicide bombing. And I still love the people who think that fanatical factions are proper justification for genocide. Bless you all!