NoCalMike

I wish I had more details on the "unreasonable" fee hikes. I mean is Viacom really being unfair, or is this just D!sh trying to shave off more fat to reep in more profits?

the hilarious part is that each company is urging customers to blame the other one. Each is advertising the other company's phone number for you to call in and complain. Both make plenty of money methinks. This sucks, but in all honesty I wouldn't be worried because it inovles so many channels, no way D!sh is gonna want to lose them, and no way Viacom will want to leave on the leading providers.

Well the fact that Bush used 9/11 paranoia to force chicken shit politicians (democrats) into signing onto the War in Iraq, pretty much sums up my feelings on this matter. Illegal, I dunno, wrong.....YEAH. However I am not really in the mood to debate this for the 100000th time.

At ECW's peak they were selling out about 5000 seat halls. Which combined with merchandise, is still a pretty good money maker. Like I have said before, if this is Heyman-controlled, and the McMahons have no say over it then ok. Also Vince can't be playing this game of, "oh look so-and-so is really popular in ECW, let me rip him out of there before he can really gain any more attention" of course since technically, it is all ONE company now, maybe Vince would just let it be. I have to say, the idea is good, if done correctly. ECW will most likely never be like it was, but SOMETHING on tv for free besides WWE-brand wrestling would be nice. Also, will the ring be smaller and the ropes be adjusted accordingly, to allow the different style of wrestling, or is this going to be WWE-style wrestling with an ECW label? Many kinks to work out before it gets my approval, but the Torch article has been the best news yet regarding the would-be scenario.

The (in)actions of one idiot do not excuse another, especially when the other one is the one is the one on the ballot. I agree, I agree... I just dont think its fair to single out one administration and let the entire blame reside on that administrations shoulders Well conservatives pretty much blame everything bad going on in this country on "this is how Clinton left the country for us when he left office" of course... republicans can only DREAM of having a president that get the things accomplished like my man W.J. Its just jealousy... drives them nuts So, when all else fails... blame Clinton Oh? And you don't possibly see, for one second, that many of the liberals in this country possess a hatred of Bush that is just as fierce - and utterly irrational - as was the hatred of Clinton by conservatives? It's the same. If anything, the attacks against Bush are even MORE vicious. Even the worst of the Clinton haters didn't compare the man to Hitler. Not hitler No, but he was pretty much called a Communist on a daily occassion complete with the Crown/Cicle(sp?) for the C in Clinton, t-shirts~!

Hmmm......Just what in the hell was I trying to say there?

"YOU'RE A GOD DAMNED MURDERER!" I remember that shiznit.....hilarious

The (in)actions of one idiot do not excuse another, especially when the other one is the one is the one on the ballot. I agree, I agree... I just dont think its fair to single out one administration and let the entire blame reside on that administrations shoulders Well conservatives pretty much blame everything bad going on in this country on "this is how Clinton left the country for us when he left office"

I doubt she ends up going to jail. Also No would should be cheering yet until worse offenders start getting out away.

My wish is that it comes down to Tajiri and Ultimo Dragon and then out of nowhere they just change it to a one on match between them for the cruiserweight title......

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/story.hts/spec...esponse/1056573 This really shouldn't turn into a finger pointing game... because the fact of the matter is, we've never waged a war on terror before 9/11. Bush ignored terrorism before the attacks and so did Clinton... and so did Reagan We learned the hardway, but we cannot assign blame to a single administration... if we criticize Bush, we must be fair and talk trash about every administration, INCLUDING the ones that helped create the monster known as Al Quaida I wouldn't say our government has ignored terrorism, hell they have supported many terrorist groups plans/projects worldwide throughtout history, however maybe they just underestimated the threat terrorism posed to America, so now all of the sudden terrorism seems to be a huge issue because of 9/11, although Al Qaeda and other filthy muslim terrorists are still commiting attacks, all that is ever brought up anymore is that "oh well AMERICA hasn't been attacked in 2 years" blah blah. I mean it is not azif before 9/11, America was being attacked daily, and Bush came in and put a stop to it. I would imagine 9/11 was a very well thought out plan that took a lot of time to develop and carry out and any other attack in the future would be the same. So maybe next time our stategy for war should be to catch and/or kill the attackers, not a completely different country because it is run by an "evildoer"

This match was only made so WWE can turn Kane back into, comedic goofball Kane all over again~!

right, but it seems like the current conensus is, "don't vote for Nader or we will get 4 more years of bush" A lot of Nader supporters have spoken out and said they are too afraid not to vote for Kerry.

Is there any possibility that neither win?

Actually, you're behind on your easily-digestable soundbytes. "We caught Saddam" is version 2.0 of "terrorism." yeah and the funny thing is, catching Saddam really has nothing to do with the "war on terrorism"

Wouldn't make sense for Nader to have more support then in 2000, but who knows really.

Well Clear Channel has ties to the government moreso then JUST the Bush administration, they basically buy off the FCC anytime they are challeneged.

Wow, they look cute, and must be just about 18 by now. Of course their movie looks like it will rank somewhere between The Real Cancun and the Justin & Kelly movie.....but here is a look at it anyway..... It's the Olsen Twins, all grown up.

Well, yeah

He doesnt need to be a #1 now that they have Shawn Springs. I guess trading Champ Bailey for Portis and signing Shawn Springs is good for the Redskins.. Exactly, to me Portis + Springs > Champ Bailey...........As much as I liked Bailey (I have his jersey...) I'd say the Skins are coming out of this looking pretty good right now.

He should debate Mancow since Mancow thinks any and all attacks on radio DJs is because they SUPPORT BUSH.....lol.

Plus, is it going to feature ECW as a whole, or will they try to skimp out on ECW workers that aren't now in WWE.

Owens to me is the best WR in the league, IN THE OPEN FIELD, once he gets the ball, he has the strength, speed and moves to take it to the house on every catch. That makes him one of the best easily. Now I don't think he is one of the best at getting seperation. I watched two years ago live in person at 3Com park, TO get handled by Fred Smoot all game long, where his only production was on a reverse gone whacko, but it resulted in a TD because once again, the TO in the open field factor. However he was pretty much kept under wraps in the passing game, but Smoot, not Bailey keep in mind, but Smoot. Not to say Smoot is any slouch at CB, but Smoot is still a #2 CB for now....

I will be reserved about this dvd. I am curious as how WWE will explain the fall of ECW.

yeah so maybe it isn't breaking any new ground, but it still looks fucking cool, and who can beat a kick-ass kung fu movie in FRENCH~! Here is the trailer: Ong Bak: Muy Tai warrior be sure to watch the Making of....it has some more cool looking clips....