NoCalMike

well she wouldn't be if she wasn't pretty, EOS. She has good enough looks combined with the money to hang out where movie stars hang out, thus the paparazzi is around snapping away. So far her fame though is at a paparazzi level. She isn't some mainstream superstar or anything.

she is rich and beautiful, but unlike other rich chicks that get called slut, I am pretty sure Paris actually is one, and she doesn't mind it either. Speaking of celeb porn. I am downloading the vince neil/janine porn.....pretty good, at least 100x better then Pam Anderson's stuff.

she is dumb, but good looking.

my fav is IT

well a lot of blonds do have brown hair down there and in other non-appealing places.

I actually think the tv miniseries was one of the best stephen king made for tv adaptions. However since we have all seen and love Kubrick's version, it is hard to look at the miniseries without bias.

I have seen the said picture, and I must say, her vaginal region looks kind of unorthodox. She has like a dark circle around the snatch. Maybe it was just a poor shaving job or due to eating nothing more then lettuce. Does anyone have an idea how long the tape is? I believe she was 19 when it was made. WOW. It should be hitting file-sharing in no time.

Well it sort of is. The point of the book is to make the house the main character. Not Jack, not the boy, not his ability to shine. The evil of the house is supposed to be the main focal point in the book.

the only gateway drug is the addiction to the drug called, "fitting in" that should be the last reason ANYONE ever drinks a beer or smokes a joint.

That is the most important line in your post. Of course I don't do heroin and I don't think it is right for me, however if a person dying from aids could buy heroin cheaper then being drugged from the hospital.....why the hell not?

who in their right mind would support their coaches. Let's see....wrestling someone to the ground could be ok, but sodomizing someone with a golfball, ermm no. I seriously doubt the coaches knew nothing, and if that is true then that is grounds for being fired merely for being oblivious.

Hahaha, I suppose so!?! I mean I guess done in the privacy of yer own home and taken in such a method that leaves no permanent damage and/or leaves no affects lasting beyond the high, leaving said person able to function normal in life besides the time he is high. Who knows? However if a Doctor was to use heroin or pot to treat pain on a patient, who is to say that is any different then using morphine?

Ok let me get this straight. A man sees a corpse cut in half, becomes ill, has some nightmares, and that is grounds to be brought up on criminal charges?

I think he is. And I'm glad that you are intelligent enough to show your disgust by voting for a third party instead of simply not voting. That never works. Well so far I have only been a part of one presidential race that I could vote for, and that was in 2000 when I voted for Nader. I will most likely do the same thing again. And if he isn't running, vote something crazy like the Prohibition party . nah, next after Nader would be libertarian party, even though I do disagree with a lot of Cary Elder's views.

I think he is. And I'm glad that you are intelligent enough to show your disgust by voting for a third party instead of simply not voting. That never works. Well so far I have only been a part of one presidential race that I could vote for, and that was in 2000 when I voted for Nader. I will most likely do the same thing again.

I most likely won't be voting for a democrat, or bush. I wonder if Nader is running again.

No offense --- but there is a SMALL chance that the source of this story might not be totally impartial. -=Mike ..."Much public support"? You mean they've DOUBLED their audience to FOUR people?!?!?! WOW!!! MikeSC, ye the article is biased/partial. I pasted it more because of the figures it gives on Clear Channel's control of radio media, moreso then the......"OMG they brought battering rams" aspect of the article. I should have stated that when I pasted the article, but I was kinda of pasting as I was running out the door......

Yeah, she's Bam's girlfriend. Go on KaZaA and download the Bam/Jenn sex scene if you want to see her boobs. what would you name the search?

http://www.liberationradio.net/articles/st...ements/raid.php This was beautiful...... San Francisco Liberation Radio Raided!FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 16, 2003 SAN FRANCSICO -- Approximately 10 federal agents, 10 San Francisco police, and 5 FCC agents raided San Francisco Liberation Radio (SFLR) studios yesterday. The raid began at 11 a.m., and lasted for approximately 2 hours. They arrived equipped with battering ram and firearms, although neither was necessary. The FCC confiscated all equipment in the station at the time, including a 16 channel Mackie sound board, microphones, a computer, CD, record, and tape players, and so much more. SFLR and its supporters view this attack within the context of media consolidation. Currently 10 parent companies control the radio spectrum. Viacom and Clear Channel alone control 42 percent of listeners and 45 percent of industry revenue. Since the passage of the 1996 Telecommunications Act Clear Channel grew from 40 stations nationwide to 1,240. In 28 of the 30 major music formats, 4 companies control over 50 percent of listeners, and the same holds true for two thirds of the nations news radio listeners. A debate about media ownership, competition, localism, and diversity is currently raging in the halls of Congress, in the nations court systems, and on the streets. SFLR has contributed its view of grass roots media activism to this debate, and for this it has been targeted. SFLR has been a vocal critic of the Bush administration policies regarding the war on terror in Iraq and elsewhere, as well as the California state and local policies including San Francisco's targeting of homeless people. The Bush administration has made every effort to silence criticism of the government. Dick Cheney, in a rare speech just several days ago warned against public dissent. Donald Rumsfeld has clearly insinuated that criticism of Bush administration policies is killing the American troops in Iraq. And yet the killing of innocent civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, and Oakland continues on a daily basis. The next major anti-war demonstration is taking place on October 25th, and includes a major convergence in San Francisco. SFLR sees this unprecedented attack on the station within the context of these national and international events. SFLR is a micro-radio station that has broadcast at 93.7 FM in the San Francisco bay area for the past 10 years. It was started in part to be an outlet and resource for communities that are underserved by the media mainstream. SFLR has garnered much public support for the work that it has done, including the August 19, 2003 passage of a resolution by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors supporting the station, media diversity in general, and directing the SF police leave the station alone.

I don't blame CC for bad music perse, however I do blame them for such media consolidation and the fact that the same music is played over and over again. I mean the RIAA controls the new crappy music that comes out, but Clear Channel controls what gets on the radio and what does not, that is not the RIAA. Clear Channel is basically the corporation that controls playlists and programming content. Remember after 9/11 the big "do not play" list...?

Guess what, pal? NONE of the radio stations are owned by Clear Channel around here. They own a local TV station (that I can't even watch over DirecTV) but a huge majority of radio in my region is locally owned. IT STILL SUCKS. I'm not saying monopolies aren't bad, but I'm tired of Clear Channel getting so much crap for radio sucking. Go blame the RIAA for pushing so many one-hit wonders. Where do you live Jobber? Bay Area? Cause if there is ONE PLACE in the entire US that would possibly take a stand to ward clear channel off it would be the Bay area of CA. Meanwhile, I am just over an hour drive from you and virtually every FM station and the sportstalk station here are owned by Clear Channel.

Yes and it passed and/or was granted. Michael Powell granted that even though you would be hard-pressed to find any member of of the left/right openly supporting it.

The Clear Channel explanation is legit. I am suprised most hear haven't heard about it before. It isn't a "conspiracy" theory really, it is just that one huge corporation has control over a ton of media outlets, and the number it has control over grows everyday, not to mention clear channels control over the goverment when it comes to issues that help their quest out. The Clear Channel issue isn't really a conservative/liberal issue. I mean yes since the guy who owns the company is a strong conservative it makes it out to look like....."oooo the evil conservative" but I wouldn't put it past a whacko liberal to do the same thing if he was in control of such a powerful corporation, but people shouldn't write the clear channel hate off as....."wow you are looney" It is the truth. Just turn on your radio and marvel at why every radio station plays the same 10 songs over and over and over again. Or how radio as a whole is becoming more bland everyday, clear channel most likely owns every single station on your FM radio dial, and a good deal of the AM stations as well. This kind of thing is SUPPOSED to be illegal, however money goes a long way in the government. Why do you think the latest FCC debacle involving Michael Powell giving clear channel ever more power and stranglehold went unreported by almost every major media outlet. No one would touch it, EVEN THOUGH democrats & republicans ACROSS THE BOARD were voicing their hostility and anger against it. You'd think an issue that pretty much both the left and the right agreed on, would make some kind of news, however no station even touched it, Gee I wonder why.

Are any politicians? All of them are just interested in getting into office, followed by paying back whatever donators helped finance their campaign.

Dude's it's simple. The act of "shooting up" is harmful if done repeatedly. Is that hard to comprehend? I never said Heroin is GOOD for you. I am sure there isn't much difference between shooting up heroin or morphine to a terminally ill patient. Either one can kill you if done irresponsibly.