billdynamite

fuck it, i'll do it. I DONT KNOOOOW~!!

Where can i get my hands on Rumble 92 and 97 via download? I haven't seen either since the actual event. EDIT: found 92.

Day/Month/Year doesnt make sense to you?

I think you just answered your own question. surely he saw the outfit before he wore it.

Bit of a pointless question... Undertaker v Mankind, i think Executioner and Paul Bearer were there in a cage or something. Taker comes to the ring with some new attire, an all leather outfit. Although it looked slightly Village People, I did mark for it at the time, maybe i was in the closet or something. But the next time I was the taker he wasn't wearing the leather stuff. So my question is... why did he drop the gay leather outfit?

I remember seeing selling like that when I was a little kid. It's just part of wrestling, as stupid as it looks. Also "Wouldn't it make more sense just to..." must be said in my head a thousand times every single time I watch it. I actually enjoyed last nights Raw, maybe because last week was so bad it just had to get better, but i thought it DID have more action and less stupid skits. But I think Vince just feels we're fucking with him and that deep down we love his bullshit skits and they shall return ASAP.

Yeah sorry... I got carried away.

Hey look, they're being satirical, taking away the signs... you know, i think Vince has started to listen. Whether he does anything about it is another question, but I think he's listening.

Ron should kick Super Crazy's ass for that, he was clearly gonna break it.

I want to see Hogan hit the boot on Khali, just so i can see his best attempt at falling to the mat. It'll be craptastic, folks.

these ladies are cracking out some good TV. Plus they're both good looking.

They may be admitting that it sucks... but they're just gonna play on it with more suckyness and treat it as Raw Is Suck, and everything that sucks will be the weekly Suck Segment and everyone will find it suckily hilarious.

and thats a shoot.

Malenko looked like Danny De Vito waddling around up there.

A serious question... Last week's Raw was terrible. But was it any worse than the Nitros or Thunders that led to WCW's death? If yes, and it is worse than the worst days of WCW, then surely Vince has a private bet that whatever he puts on TV, people will watch it. right now, he's winning that bet.

That's it. I'm going on a complete WWE hiatus after the Rumble. I'm not even going to check news. I'll just give it 6 months and see whats happening. If everyone who's not happy just stayed away from WWE for a while, someone may notice and things may change. I did have a dream though that Jericho would surprise everyone by returning at the rumble. But i feel the same as above. As great as it would be to see Jericho again, he will be wasted.

Vince has ALWAYS thought that, despite what he's said publicly at times. He always books based on what he wants, rather than what the fans want. The sole exception being Austin in 1997, but it was either go with that or go belly-up. Thanks for posting these. So really, Vince is only going to do what the fans want if WWE have real competition. Even then, I think they'll need to be in some serious trouble... So we're talking years aren't we? we're talking a LONG time, if anything at all. Damn.

anybody know how long Punk's deal is for? Plus it's real sad that Vince pretty much ignores the crowd reaction. He must just go backstage and say "they don't know what they're talking about." I think Vince thinks he knows what's best for us, regardless of how much we boo and chant for a rival promotion on live TV.

I watch this "So called ECW" because its a hell of a lot better than the shit storm that is Raw. that's debatable. Raw this week was terrible though, so i suppose i should shut up right about now. I ask simply because everyone knocks it, Vince CLEARLY doesn't give a shit about the heritage of ECW, yet people are still watching and posting about it. If we didn't watch these shows, they would know about it and be forced to change. Instead we just watch and moan about it afterwards (and during in most cases). that's all i'm saying. Jeez, people seem so pissed off with everything i saw lately. Dude, i just gave you a simple answer. Where you got I was pist off, I have no clue. I'm very sensitive right now. forgive me.

I watch this "So called ECW" because its a hell of a lot better than the shit storm that is Raw. that's debatable. Raw this week was terrible though, so i suppose i should shut up right about now. I ask simply because everyone knocks it, Vince CLEARLY doesn't give a shit about the heritage of ECW, yet people are still watching and posting about it. If we didn't watch these shows, they would know about it and be forced to change. Instead we just watch and moan about it afterwards (and during in most cases). that's all i'm saying. Jeez, people seem so pissed off with everything i saw lately.

If I wanted to, I could probably simply wikipedia the term and copy it from there. What would that prove? And it comes as no surprise that you would act so elitist. I'm sure you're much more of a smark than i am, your title is intact, don't worry. I'm not trying to act elitist, I wasn't insulting you, I just think it would be easier to either say you don't know what it means, or look it up and pretend you knew it all along. There's no point to keep arguing back and forth with people about it. And I'm not a huge smark anyways. I just thought "who is this guy to demand i explain the meaning of something?" I'm not in school anymore. I'm not a child, I'm not on here insulting people or being an ass, so i don't appreciate being looked at as an idiot who doesn't know what a smark is. I am a smart mark, that's why i'm here, to discuss the non-kayfabe goings on in the wrestling business. Let me do it, and stop trying to make me look stupid. I assume you look at my post count and assumed i was a "newbie" to wrestling or 12 year old who wants to pretend he knows what he's talking about, but i've been a regular viewer of this site for a long time before i even joined. and i don't pretend to be someone who knows all about wrestling and it's past, because i'm not. But I am a wrestling fan, consider myself a smart fan, and im here to discuss it like everybody else.

If I wanted to, I could probably simply wikipedia the term and copy it from there. What would that prove? And it comes as no surprise that you would act so elitist. I'm sure you're much more of a smark than i am, your title is intact, don't worry.

You realize that posting here also makes you a smark... No way, I'm sure there are plenty of marks here. All wrestlers probably. So what is a 'smark' then? You've thrown that term around lately, so tell us what it means. You talking to me? No, the other billdynamite whose post I quoted. there were other people involved in the quote. Regardless, why would i need your approval on what i say a smark is? I quoted you directly. I'm not sure why you're talking about approval. I'm just asking you what a 'smark' is. You've used the term to refer to people or groups of people in a negative manner, so I'm interested in what the word means in the way you're using it. Since you're so adept at quoting, why don't you quote where I've used it negatively. Because I have never referred to a smark negatively. and if you believe I have, you're mistaken.

Shawn went for an elbow off the top rope but Vader was out of position or something because Shawn stopped short and landed on his feet and then began stomping on Vader and yelling at him. It looked weird and you could see something was going on. It wasn't the first time Shawn lost his cool that year on PPV, because he was quite notorious for it during that time. Yep. don't remember that at all. Cheers.

You realize that posting here also makes you a smark... No way, I'm sure there are plenty of marks here. All wrestlers probably. So what is a 'smark' then? You've thrown that term around lately, so tell us what it means. You talking to me? No, the other billdynamite whose post I quoted. there were other people involved in the quote. Regardless, why would i need your approval on what i say a smark is?