Guest LexLugerRules Posted August 2, 2002 Report Posted August 2, 2002 I see Test Vs. Undertaker also. Why not? Taker these days reminds me alot like Hogan, realize it's their last run, and want to put over young talent while at it. Lex....Luger....Rules? .......YOU MARK FOR LEX LUGER???? So? I liked Luger since 1988, when I was a little kid.
Guest Respect The 'Taker Posted August 2, 2002 Report Posted August 2, 2002 I see Test Vs. Undertaker also. Why not? Taker these days reminds me alot like Hogan, realize it's their last run, and want to put over young talent while at it. Lex....Luger....Rules? .......YOU MARK FOR LEX LUGER???? So? I liked Luger since 1988, when I was a little kid. Dude....find a dictionary and look up JOKE...then proceed to laugh as though you knew that all along. This has been the Taker Mark
Guest Trivia247 Posted August 2, 2002 Report Posted August 2, 2002 a few Weeks back before Raven's Banishment from Raw, I thought He and Undertaker working together that One moment against the Hardy's Kicked all Kinds of Ass .... Since on the other ardent Taker Mark on the planet. Undertaker turning face has put him in limbo, no one really to feud with, thats why he aimlessly came out and destroyed Harvard boy just for the hell of it. Undertaker gave some to you Evil Taker haters by being one of the ways to put Team Canada over! Probably be Taker vs Test... Isn't that just Special ain't it?
Guest BionicRedneck Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Taker these days reminds me alot like Hogan, realize it's their last run, and want to put over young talent while at it. erm...when did Taker put someone over? It must have been during that InVasion angle, right? Or maybe when he kicked the crap out of Jeff Hardy(and his brother)-week after week-but then raised his hand. Or the way he sold for young Chris Nowinski? Or the way he made Brock Lesnar look like a badass by running from him? Or when he lost the WWE Undisputed Title, but Kurt Angle took the pinfall?
Guest SuperTonyJaymz Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Best Triple Threat ever? May be the cage match with Shamrock/Mankind/Rock...or maybe its the Arguette/Jarret.DDP match..hmm..oh wait...sin't there a triple threat this up coming week, for the X title no less? hmm... (~Uber Cheap Plug 3) Sorry couldn't help it. Actually, I wouldn't mind an UT vs. Chris Harvard match, with UT just destroying Hardvard ala HBK(Ground Zero) but Nowinski picking up the extremely cheap win somehow, and gloating about how he beat the phenom. Thats how you make a heel people hate.
Guest Trivia247 Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Taker these days reminds me alot like Hogan, realize it's their last run, and want to put over young talent while at it. erm...when did Taker put someone over? It must have been during that InVasion angle, right? Or maybe when he kicked the crap out of Jeff Hardy(and his brother)-week after week-but then raised his hand. Or the way he sold for young Chris Nowinski? Or the way he made Brock Lesnar look like a badass by running from him? Or when he lost the WWE Undisputed Title, but Kurt Angle took the pinfall? Its sad when people are SO Rabid Taker haters they don't read between the lines. a Wrestler doesn't have to Job or Be Squashed too others over. Though Im sure YOU just want him to lose regardless of who it is. When HHH Austin and Other Main Eventers are too busy on THEIR side of the Locker rooms Undertaker actually been standing next to the likes of Tommy Dreamer and Randy orton the Hardys and Chris Nowinski. The Fact he beat them doesn't mean more than Actually fighting them? What did Austin do with Midcarders, only to line them up during the Invasion angle to tell him how great he is, or Whipping Tazz? Angle and Jericho also been doing more than the usual Main Event Suspects. More exposure to Main Eventers helps Lower card wrestlers become more established. and Taker did that with those he fought recently. Lets Not get all Dramatic over the "Contravisial Ending of the Smackdown match." It was all Angled so Kurt would be added into the mix to make the Main Event a better match. But OHHHH Kurt Must AUTOMATICALLY should have won the match, because he was against Taker. And He HAS to win that right? So Dramatic Taker doesn't put anyone over...... ok and HHH was so sincere when he Comes down from the Mountaintop to give a PEP talk to those Lowly wrestlers he BOOKS or buries.
Guest BionicRedneck Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 whoever said i was a "Taker Hater"? He gets praise for wrestling mid-carders? yeah, if he actually sold for them. Did you watch the WWF during the InVasion? Taker was pretty fucking selfish, when he made former world champion DDP look like his bitch. Infact, he completely no-selled his way through two WCW tag teams, before bringing in his pals Kronik. Oh, he sold for his friends alright, shame the match was abysmal. During the Invasion he did nothing to help, and thats my main problem with him. Since then he has improved. For instance, he made RVD look his equal on more than one occasion. But, I personally think it is ludicrous to suggest he: "realize it's their last run, and want to put over young talent while at it." I haven't seen him do any of that. What did Austin do with Midcarders, only to line them up during the Invasion angle to tell him how great he is, or Whipping Tazz? Actually, he had fairly competitive matches with guys like Tajiri and Spike Dudley aswell. Without Austin the Invasion would have been a complete disaster. Imagine if Taker had been in Austins shoes, how bad would it have been then?
Guest Trivia247 Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 OHHh WHAA WHAAA WHAA Taker was Selfish Dawww Pooor you Taker hater lol
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 whoever said i was a "Taker Hater"? He gets praise for wrestling mid-carders? yeah, if he actually sold for them. Did you watch the WWF during the InVasion? Taker was pretty fucking selfish, when he made former world champion DDP look like his bitch. Infact, he completely no-selled his way through two WCW tag teams, before bringing in his pals Kronik. Oh, he sold for his friends alright, shame the match was abysmal. During the Invasion he did nothing to help, and thats my main problem with him. Since then he has improved. For instance, he made RVD look his equal on more than one occasion. But, I personally think it is ludicrous to suggest he: "realize it's their last run, and want to put over young talent while at it." I haven't seen him do any of that. What did Austin do with Midcarders, only to line them up during the Invasion angle to tell him how great he is, or Whipping Tazz? Actually, he had fairly competitive matches with guys like Tajiri and Spike Dudley aswell. Without Austin the Invasion would have been a complete disaster. Imagine if Taker had been in Austins shoes, how bad would it have been then? Man has a point there.
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 I'd have to agree, if it wasn't for Paranoid Co-Dependant Austin, I would have cried myself to sleep on a whole lot of Monday nights for a couple months there. As for Taker, he's doing exactly what he should be. Nothing important! Just let him slowly fade away in peace. 3 or 4 months, you won't even notice he's gone. Well, Taker Mark will. Nobody else though.
Guest El Psycho Diablo Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Actually, the invasion was bad anyway. Not all of us like Austin 24/7. Think about how most of YOU feel about HHH, and apply it to Austin. That's how I am. HE was the focus of the invasion angle when it should have rightfully been the WCW guys. People want to bitch about Rock not losing his first PPV match to Booker T, well..was it too much of a shot that Booker..the WCW Champion of all things, could have been the WCW-side leader? With enough work, he could have been put on Austin/HHH/Rock's level. But no, Austin needed the elevation from getting 40+ min of TV time a week, and champion. Yep, that up and comer.. None of the WWF guys were very good to the WCW ones during that time, not just 'taker. Would it have hurt Austin to let Tazz look strong once, or not Stunner the entire Alliance? No. But he did anyway. Screw everybody else, as long as Stone Cold came out looking good. If they'd have taken one tenth of the airtime that just Austin got, and used it to try getting Booker, Kidman, etc over..you know, they might not be in the problem they are now. But they didn't do that, and Austin was the focus of the place 'til Jericho won the belt. Look where that left 'em.
Guest The Man in Blak Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Taker has been saddled with test. Just like Rock got Brock and Angle may get Hogan. The three men who were in THE BEST TRIPLE THREAT MATCH EVER~! Get to face three of (If not the three) worst workers in the company. IRONY~! or something. I'm positively astounded...aghast, even, that you hold that match in a higher regard to the other Angle triple threat. You know, the Chris Benoit / Kurt Angle / Chris Jericho Euro-Continental three-way at Wrestlemania 2000? At any rate, my guess would be a handicap tag match: Brothers of Destruction v. The Un-Americans A simple three-on-two to phase Kane back in and, more than likely, to restore the heat of the BoD (unfortunately).
Guest Respect The 'Taker Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Its sad when people are SO Rabid Taker haters they don't read between the lines. a Wrestler doesn't have to Job or Be Squashed too others over. Though Im sure YOU just want him to lose regardless of who it is. When HHH Austin and Other Main Eventers are too busy on THEIR side of the Locker rooms Undertaker actually been standing next to the likes of Tommy Dreamer and Randy orton the Hardys and Chris Nowinski. The Fact he beat them doesn't mean more than Actually fighting them? What did Austin do with Midcarders, only to line them up during the Invasion angle to tell him how great he is, or Whipping Tazz? Angle and Jericho also been doing more than the usual Main Event Suspects. More exposure to Main Eventers helps Lower card wrestlers become more established. and Taker did that with those he fought recently. Lets Not get all Dramatic over the "Contravisial Ending of the Smackdown match." It was all Angled so Kurt would be added into the mix to make the Main Event a better match. But OHHHH Kurt Must AUTOMATICALLY should have won the match, because he was against Taker. And He HAS to win that right? So Dramatic Taker doesn't put anyone over...... ok and HHH was so sincere when he Comes down from the Mountaintop to give a PEP talk to those Lowly wrestlers he BOOKS or buries. Amen, Taker Marks so rule This has been the Taker Mark
Guest evenflowDDT Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Is Kane going to be back in time for SummerSlam? If so, then the Brothers of Destruction vs. Team Canada feud seems most likely, since Kane no longer has an X-Pac to feud with and 'Taker has nobody to feud with. Plus, a win over the Brothers of Destruction (particularly a clean one) to retain the tag titles would also help Team Canada get over.
Guest Respect The 'Taker Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Is Kane going to be back in time for SummerSlam? If so, then the Brothers of Destruction vs. Team Canada feud seems most likely, since Kane no longer has an X-Pac to feud with and 'Taker has nobody to feud with. Plus, a win over the Brothers of Destruction (particularly a clean one) to retain the tag titles would also help Team Canada get over. Agreed, although im against ANOTHER teaming of Taker-Kane, as long as it was made clear it was a one off thing to help his brother settle the score with the 'Un-Americans' ( Seriously, whats so bad about that name? ), i could deal with Kane returning in his brothers corner. Lance Storm & Christian are one hot team, and a clean win over Taker & Kane can't do their career's any harm. This has been the Taker Mark
Guest cabbageboy Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 It looks like the Canadians might face Michaels and HHH. No really. If so, how about another Test/Kane match baby!? Haha. I didn't hate that as bad as some people though. RVD/UT would then happen. UT has never officially turned face, but that could be the moment. So far he has shaken the hands of guys he has crushed. Let's see RVD beat him and then UT extends the hand. That would be a memorable moment.
Guest BionicRedneck Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 I would say Taker has officially turned face, by opposing Eric Bischoff, and by the fact he did his "old school" rope-walk for the first time ages.
Guest Trivia247 Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 I said a few weeks back on his Face turn that he is one of these characters who really doesn't care if he is a Goodguy or Badguy he becomes a Goodguy Face via Circumstances. He does what he does, then when a heel group comes by and messes with him, then he turns face because he has to. Then he becomes the "Concious" of the WWE again
Guest saturnmark4life Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Well, test/taker would certainly suck, but i wouldn't mind if taker put him over. They just need to do what they can for the canadians.
Guest the 1inch punch Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Make him the Anti-Bischoff Guy Someone on the board had it right though, Taker and Kane will do a DDP job to the Canadians at Summerlsm, and they'll stick them on the Island Boys then Then, Kane will turn on Taker been sinceits been two years since they did that
Guest Respect The 'Taker Posted August 3, 2002 Report Posted August 3, 2002 Then, Kane will turn on Taker been since its been two years since they did that Sadly enough....i think your right This has been The Taker Mark
Guest saturnmark4life Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 i didn't know you could pluralise 'taker marks'...
Guest bravesfan Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 Think about how most of YOU feel about HHH, and apply it to Austin. That's how I am. HE was the focus of the invasion angle when it should have rightfully been the WCW guys. C'Mon. Besides Booker, DDP and Rhyno, which of the rest of the Alliance posed a real threat to Austin/Angle/Taker/Rock, etc? Was RVD established as someone that would get insanely over in the WWF audience yet? Could the talented cruisers (Helms, Kidman, Chavo) have done anything to help the main feud here? The Alliance was rushed so incredibly fast, that we had only 2 of WCW's more credible stars, when we could've had Flair, used Bischoff in a REAL "this person is out to end Vince's company" role AND had the nWo?!? THAT would've been an Invasion. Instead, the heatless wonders known as the ECW Faction minus RVD sucked everything out of the feud, when they combined with WCW... Austin was placed on the Alliance, to SAVE the angle. Even Heyman and BOTH McMahon kids couldn't make this a solid angle to build the company upon. It would've all ended miserably at the Invasion PPV, had Austin not turned.
Guest LesnarLunatic Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 what about an 8 man tag? Test, Storm, Christian and Regal v. Undertaker, Kane, Jeff Hardy and RVD
Guest evenflowDDT Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 what about an 8 man tag? Test, Storm, Christian and Regal v. Undertaker, Kane, Jeff Hardy and RVD Yea, but how are you going to fit in Jeff Hardy & RVD? Just kind of a "spur of the moment" thing? I thought the Hardy/Regal charade was over. And yes, I think the 'Taker/Kane team is a bit tired, but what else is there for either man to do? I agree that if it happens, it would best be a temporary alliance, which it'd be if they lost to Team Canada.
Guest Respect The 'Taker Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 i didn't know you could pluralise 'taker marks'... At least the arena doesn't go DEAD when my hero comes out...Hmmm Saturnmark? This has been the Taker Mark
Guest AlwaysPissedOff Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 i didn't know you could pluralise 'taker marks'... At least the arena doesn't go DEAD when my hero comes out...Hmmm Saturnmark? This has been the Taker Mark™ OUCH! Not trying to instigate anything, but DAMN...
Guest LexLugerRules Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 Undertaker is ok, BUT THE LEX EXPRESS LIVES ON!
Guest Respect The 'Taker Posted August 4, 2002 Report Posted August 4, 2002 Undertaker is ok, BUT THE LEX EXPRESS LIVES ON! Hate to post something pointless but... FLEXY LEX! FLEXY LEX! FLEXY LEX! This has been the not so buff Taker Mark
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now