Super bowl coverage

[Guest Vern Gagne]

Does anyone think that ESPN goes a little overboard on it's Super Bowl coverage. They have about 20 people covering the game. They have a 3 hour NFL Countdown, how could you discuss one game for 3 hours.

[Guest JAMES900]

Well in the uk it's like that for the fa cup only they have about 4 hours worth of build up, they usually fill these countdowns with interviews and reviews of the teams seasons.  Still my intrest was lost once the dolphins were out.

[Guest Tony149]

ESPN goes overboard a lot on sports events they like i.e. Super bowl, etc. They didn't even do that for the first ever XFL game, which was a big event in it's own right. Although, they do broadcast NFL games so that's to be expected. For those who might ask, yes, I actually liked the XFL. BUT Fox Sports Net bashed it really hard.

[Guest Eraser2K2]

ESPN is the only sports channel that matters, as I think is evident as Fox Sports has cancelled its news program already.  3 hours isn't that much for the Super Bowl, and its a lot better than watching some stupid singers on Fox.  Now only if they hyped the Stanley Cup Finals like this.

[Guest Kahran Ramsus]

Headline Sports is better than ESPN.

[Guest Choken One]

I think 3 hours is theight amount as long as it's not all "X and O's". Remember Super Bowl XXXIII got like 6 hours of hype for a game that was built around the two coaches with no personaity and The fact it was Elway's swan song. I flipped between both Fox and ESPN and felt ESPN for the most part was better, whie Fox was singers and various stuff.