The greatest WWE superstar of all time

[Guest RickyChosyu]

All these "accomplishments" are bull

 

Then is it a big coincidence that the greatest performers in the history of the WWE are the same guys who have accomplished the most? No.

 

Titles do mean something. They signify your progression to the very top of the business. The more gold that the company puts on you, the more that they believe in you as a draw.

What do you mean, "greatest"? Are you talking the best wrestlers? If so, then I doubt Yokozuna, Hogan, Sid, and Taker are the kind of guys you would want gracing your list. Are you talking drawing power? Then Diesel, Shawn Michaels, Ultimate Warior, and (in some years) Hulk Hogan aren't deserving either. So what exactly are you refering to, then? Owen Hart, Rick Flair, Ricky Steamboat, Roddy Piper, and Ted Dibiase were phenominal at what they did, but how many title reigns did they have compared to someone like the Undertaker?

 

Make up your mind as to what it is you're trying to prove before arguing about it.

[Guest BigTim2002]

Good point Ricky, and your sig still rocks.

[Guest Mystery Eskimo]

Angle was also a hardcore champ

Huh? When? Was it for like 2 seconds under crappy 24/7 rules?

 

This means he only needs the tag titles to have held everything under the sun.

[Guest RickyChosyu]

Angle was also a hardcore champ

Huh? When? Was it for like 2 seconds under crappy 24/7 rules?

 

This means he only needs the tag titles to have held everything under the sun.

Bingo. Made Van Dam submit on the stage to win the title, Austin threw him off afterwards, and then threw Van Dam off as well because he just didn't like the guy. Van Dam landed on Angle, and both guys were out, so the ref counted the three and gave the belt back to Van Dam.

 

Why anyone even bothers counting that title for anything is beyond me.

[Guest RicFlairGlory]

did the rockers never win the wwf tag team titles? because i know shawn held them with austin (b. owen and bulldog on raw) once. anybody know?

It depends. There was a title change, but it didn't make it to TV for reasons that elude me at the moment. Anyway, at the time the WWF didn't acknowledge the change and kept them on the Hart Foundation. However, when promoting the New Rockers, they put over the originial pair as "Former WWF Tag Team Champions" meaning that they did acknowledge the change so that Jannetty got the status of being a former tag champ. Not that it actually made any difference.

Doesnt matter anyways,

 

HBK held the Tag Belts with Diesel as well.... 2X champion

[Guest RicFlairGlory]

Yeah, but does holding a WCW title mean anything in the WWE?

 

All these "accomplishments" are bull

 

Then is it a big coincidence that the greatest performers in the history of the WWE are the same guys who have accomplished the most? No.

 

Titles do mean something. They signify your progression to the very top of the business. The more gold that the company puts on you, the more that they believe in you as a draw.

The way they're passing belts around now, I seriously doubt that Titles signify much of anything after the aforementioned folks...

[Guest NazMistry]

The way they're passing belts around now, I seriously doubt that Titles signify much of anything after the aforementioned folks...

Exactly. The Rock may be a 7 time champion, but for me the last Rock title win that meant anything, was his win over Triple H at Backlash 2000.

Since then it's been a pin on Vince, a shitty month reigh before jobbing to Austin, granted it was a good match, but it was a cynical money making title reign. And this Undisputed reign is gonna be worth dick when he loses to Brock OR HHH on Raw.