Guest MrRant Report post Posted September 11, 2002 What if its the best view/location/skiing etc? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DeputyHawk Report post Posted September 11, 2002 meh. you're funnier with the no ma'am stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MrRant Report post Posted September 11, 2002 I wasn't trying to be funny. I'm just saying that may be the reason and it could be a money losing venture if they build it on another mountain. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DeputyHawk Report post Posted September 11, 2002 sometimes money should come after respect. barking up the wrong tree, i know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MrRant Report post Posted September 11, 2002 I understand that really I do. I guess TO ME its not the same as say building a hotel on a concentration camp. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest DeputyHawk Report post Posted September 11, 2002 true, but i think the principle remains the same. i can understand the outcry, is all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Hogan Made Wrestling Report post Posted September 11, 2002 Building a museum or something wouldn't be a big deal, however building a luxury hotel trivialises an important historical site. Hell, in the US people don't want anything being rebuilt over the WTC site, and that's recent history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest the 1inch punch Report post Posted September 13, 2002 BTW: Didn't Nike/some other sneaker outfit offend a Muslim group by having a holy symbol or something on one brand of shoe some years back? Yes they did It was Nike, btw, i only remember this because my cousin has said sneakers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
