Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted October 6, 2002 maybe... *evil laugh* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest godthedog Report post Posted October 6, 2002 Thank you LaParkacar, finally someone realizes this is just a show meant to entertain us. I just get so sick and tired of people flaming the Undertaker and Kane. I am not a big fan of Triple H, but stop flaming him too. He is doing what he thinks is right. He may be wrong in his thinking but porking the owners wife helps a lot. Just take a long look at how WWF was and what WWE has become over the years and years of awesome destruction. I mean, just take a long look at how it used to be when Tito Santana was in, it was alright back then but it is/was nothing like it is today! I for one am ANIT-ROCK, but most of the people I have ran into like the SOB. I can not see how, the ROCK is a halfwit who pushes around commentators ON AIR that is, and pushes around younger talent such as Angle and the rest and expects everyone to still "LOVE" him. Well, not me and damn sure not ever. When The Rock was Rocky Maivia I was one of the guys holding up a sign saying Die Rocky Die. Did I mean it? No, I don't wish death on anyone, however if he left wrestling today, I couldn't care less. The Rock is the worst wrestler in the WWE and following right behind him is Christin the Whinebag. I hope the Rock does retire and give up wrestling, then we will not have to see his ugly, worthless ass on tv ever again except in his two-bit movies. That is it, see ya! you know...it's kind of moot what with the spelling errors & all, but the rock can't really hold down younger talent like angle, cause he's younger than angle is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest KANE Report post Posted October 6, 2002 I'm a huge Kane mark, but I don't get angry when someone here says he sucks. However, I do concede that I get annoyed when Scott Keith does it, because I think he should give Kane a little more credit. What I'm saying, YOUSUCK, is that people are allowed to flame wrestlers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Report post Posted October 6, 2002 I don't think Kane is that bad at all. But I do understand that this push is just last second bullshit that serves him and everyone else no good. Except HHH of course. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest cabbageboy Report post Posted October 6, 2002 Oh I agree, but I doubt Kane will be buried in this whole deal because the guy is being built so insanely strong for this PPV. Christ, he's won the tag belts, the IC, and is challenging for the world. The only thing that makes me hesitant here is one of my key rules of wrestling: Taker and Kane will not job on the same PPV. Think about this, sure both UT and Kane should lose at the PPV but I'm straining to recall a PPV where both did lose major singles matches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest midnight_burn Report post Posted October 6, 2002 The only thing that makes me hesitant here is one of my key rules of wrestling: Taker and Kane will not job on the same PPV. Think about this, sure both UT and Kane should lose at the PPV but I'm straining to recall a PPV where both did lose major singles matches. For a PPV where both Kane and Taker both lost singles matches you'd have to go back to Fully Loaded '99, Kane losing to the Big Show and the Undertaker losing to Steve Austin. Other than that i don't think Kane/Taker have ever both lost singles matches on the same Pay Per View event. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
