Guest cynicalprofit Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 He's got the look, big, which VKM loves, he's a legit star, even if his workrate has gone down since 94, and he's getting attention before he even debuts. He's a big guy who makes just about everyone around him look small in comparison. So do you think, if he last that is, they will stick a world title on him? Either Brock or HHH's. Now I dont see point in doing it to Brock, since it kills wrestlemanina Brock vs Angle, dead, but HHH's I could see happening. Even if HHH is against it.
Guest Banky Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 Title quickly? Maybe. Big push immediatly? Yes. If Big push means increased ratings and big crowd heat? He'll get the title at the Royal Rumble.
Your Paragon of Virtue Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 There aren't any titles left to give him. No way they'd give him a world title right away. I doubt they would've given him the IC either, because that would be a step down, but that's neither here nor there...
Guest Human Fly Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 1bob (I know, I know) speculated at a possible HHH - Stenier 'Mania match. I doubt HHH will still have the title then (although I wouldn't be surprised).
Guest HartFan86 Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 He won't get a title cause there is none.
Guest Cataclysm911 Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 1bob (I know, I know) speculated at a possible HHH - Stenier 'Mania match. I doubt HHH will still have the title then (although I wouldn't be surprised). I'd be thrilled if Triple H kept the title until Wrestlemania. The WWE needs to bring back lengthy title reigns.. Brock has a decent one going too. So does Jamie Knoble.
Guest Angle-plex Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 He'll win the belt right after RVD wins it or HHH "loses his smile".
Guest bps "The Truth" 21 Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 I'd have to say that they will not give him the title until they are sure that he won't just break down on them. The reason they hadn't signed him to this point is because he has huge health concerns.
Guest HartFan86 Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 This question is sorta like asking if Scott Hall were to get a title when he first came back. Or Nash. Or Hogan. We'll just have to see cause quite frankly, Hall could be gone within who knows how long.
Guest BigPoppaKev Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 Not right away. But I can definately see him winning the "World" title down the road. I am wondering when he is going to debut and where. I think it is almost a given that he is going to be on RAW but you never know.
Guest AndrewTS Posted October 27, 2002 Report Posted October 27, 2002 There aren't any titles left to give him. No way they'd give him a world title right away. I doubt they would've given him the IC either, because that would be a step down, but that's neither here nor there... IC? Er...you've forgotten...
Guest DJ Jeff Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 I can see sometime down the road, possibly at Wrestlemania 19, he'll win the World Title, or the WWE Title, depending on what show he's on. Speaking of what show he should be on, I say RAW, so I can see HHH© vs. Steiner for the World Title at Wrestlemania 19.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 Steiner will not come right in and beat HHH or Lesnar (especially HHH) for the Title. He might get a cheap non title win or a DQ win against either of em, but he's not beating either of em for the Title so soon.
Guest Anglesault Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 They'll give him the belt, just to piss me off.
Guest Pop Culture God Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 AS don't you consider Steiner the lesser of two evils when compared to HGH?
Guest Anglesault Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 Oh, I have no problem with Steiner at all. I just hate this game of "Give the title to anybody BUT Angle" that they have been playing all year.
Guest CanadianChick Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 That would be utterly stupid if Steiner was given the belt. I HATE Scott. He (currently) sucks as a wrestler, isn't very coherent in interviews and isn't entertaining at all.
Guest Nater Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 On Raw, HHH beats Steiner because its HHH.. On Smackdown, Brock beats Steiner because I believe he dwarfs him, and you know how important the "Hoss Factor" is...
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 I gotta say that if he goes to Smackdown hes the heel if Brock continues towards being a face with the lack of credible main event level heels on Smackdown (Show, Matt Hardy??..) If he goes to RAW hes a face because they need an Face that looks like he could stand up to HHH. RVD, Booker T, Kane, Bubba certainly aren't looking too good in that department..
Guest cynicalprofit Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 Oh, I have no problem with Steiner at all. I just hate this game of "Give the title to anybody BUT Angle" that they have been playing all year. I think its because he's getting it at Mania. Either way hes one of 2 guys that really deserve it, the other being Benoit.
Guest Just call me Dan Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 I'd like to see him go to Smackdown to be a big heel which that show needs now ( No Show doesn't count) that way Booker and RVD can get the spotlight they need on Raw rather than Steiner taking it away.
Rob E Dangerously Posted October 28, 2002 Report Posted October 28, 2002 so, if Angle tries to provoke mat wrestling with Steiner, will Steiner just look at Angle like he's stupid?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now