Guest Redhawk Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Maybe this just means The Rock is coming back soon. Rock is one of the few people to ever have a decent match with Show.
Guest eirejmcmahon Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 I actually stopped watching the PPV after Show won, they can stick their product up their arse.
Guest the pinjockey Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 That would be wonderful. Have part time wrestlers fighting for the title on both shows. I don't want Rock anywhere near titles. he can draw enough as an attraction he shouldn't waste title feuds in his short term stints.
Guest evilhomer Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 The worst part of this title reign is that he has nobody to fight. With his current "awakened Giant" gimmick, no small wrestler has any hope against him. At least as The Big Joke, a small guy would get some offence in. As the super-strong, no selling Giant, no sub-300 pounder can hurt him. Angle or Benoit are the only two that could carry him to a watchable, believable match, but they're both tied up with their own fued.
Guest EricMM Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Can you say "Holla if ya Hear me"?
Guest EricMM Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 You mean Heyman right...? You don't think Paul Wight-Scott Steiner is gold? Cuz it's only gold if you mean gold as in shitty... Is that what you mean?
Guest notJames Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Right around 9:15 last night, I would have said Big Show was the worst champ. Then the Elimination Chamber happened. That "eliminated" all doubt as to who is worse. You see, at least we'll get Brock getting revenge on Pig Show to regain the title. Who else but HHHe-Man is going to take the Fake Title off of God-boy? Not Jericho. Not RVD. Not Booker T. I personally don't want to see The SuperKliqPowers Collide again. Ever. (Can we just link all the Kliq members as one collective championship of suck and be done with it? 'Cuz really, none of them were or are championship material.)
Guest notJames Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 You mean Heyman right...? You don't think Paul Wight-Scott Steiner is gold? Cuz it's only gold if you mean gold as in shitty... Is that what you mean? I think he was being facetious. ... I hope he was being facetious... It's like the Hullabalooza episode of the Simpsons when those two teenagers are talking: "Are you being sarcastic?" "I don't even know anymore."
Guest notJames Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Thanks. BTW, I like the Teddy Roosevelt quote. Very apropos. Reminds me of Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged which I just finished reading again. Vince and Co. should take a lesson from that novel... you can't run the world on whims and feelings and "friendships"; those who have the tools to propel the world forward should be given the reigns. Everyone else should step aside.
Guest Brian Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 I can see Jericho challenging but no one else. Just the heel match-ups. Heck, I could see Jericho winning with Triple H interference.
Guest converge241 Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Slaughter was the worst, even though they did have a reason for it - it does not excuse it
Guest Choken One Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Slaughter wasn't a good wrestler but he was a good champion, he got good heel heat (who wouldn't) and did what was asked of him no questions asked. you could make an arguement for the weak title reigns of Jericho, Kane, and others. The requirements for "Worst" Champion ever has to be 1). Not a Draw. 2). Not even a Main eventer 3.) Not the focal point of the company 4.) Did nothing of note 5.) Not remembered... That allows me to nominate...The Undertaker's Run in 1997. He was a midcarder with Mankind, Farrooq while Steve/Bret/Shawn headlined during the run...until WWF threw him back into the mix...AFTER he lost the title.
Guest FakeRazor Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Show's bad, but I still don't know if he's as bad as the man in my sig.
Guest Your Olympic Hero Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 '02 Slow is definitely the worst. Only coming close is '91 Sgt. Slobber.
Guest dreamer420 Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 I can appriciate what the WWE is trying to do with Big Show but it is waaaay to late. His match with Lesnar last night was as good as it was going to be and I'm glad they kept it short. If he is going to hold the title for a month only, and then drop it back to the Big Show, I'll be happy.
Guest Anglesault Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Is the 2002 version of the Big Show the worst Champ ever? Not over, no good matches, I can't think of anything good at all. Same thing applies to 2002 HHH and 20002 Brock Lesnar.
ChrisMWaters Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Same thing applies to 2002 HHH and 20002 Brock Lesnar. Wow...Brock Lesnar is still alive in the year 20002? Oh, and you're wrong...at least in MSG, Brock was SUPER over.
Guest Anglesault Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 Same thing applies to 2002 HHH and 20002 Brock Lesnar. Wow...Brock Lesnar is still alive in the year 20002? Oh, and you're wrong...at least in MSG, Brock was SUPER over. ONLY in MSG. Maybe Big Show will become over during the reign. After all, that's how Brock "earned" his title. So if he gets over, no one who gave Brock a pass should bitch about Show.
Guest saturnmark4life Posted November 18, 2002 Report Posted November 18, 2002 I love the big show. I can't advocate this mess, but i won't complain about anything he does. Fuck knows why.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now