Guest NoSelfWorth Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Wrestlingdotcom.com is reporting that the Torch newsletter is saying that Torrie Wilson is to pose for Playboy. Nothing on the Torch or Observer sites about it, so take it for what it's worth for now. Wrestlingdotcom.com
Guest dreamer420 Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Nice. I'll buy that issue for sure. Too bad it's not Victoria or Lita.
Guest AndrewTS Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Well, she's no Trish--but if this happens... WHOO-HOOOO!! PUPPIES!! Wait? Playboy? Aw crap--sunsets, airbrushing and no snatch.
Guest buffybeast Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 I'm a hetero girl and I would buy it. I don't know if this rumor is true, however. I would think Trish would be the next diva to pose.
Guest The Mighty Damaramu Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Mmmm.....naked Trish should be next. I still think a "Nude WWE Divas" issue would sell a lot.
Guest cynicalprofit Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Posing and being naked are 2 different things. Shawn "Posed" in playgirl but showed nothing.
Guest AndrewTS Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Posing and being naked are 2 different things. Shawn "Posed" in playgirl but showed nothing. What the hell is the point if they aren't going to be showing skin? They could just have her pose in Raw magazine if she's not going to be naked in it. Then they'd get all of the profits.
Guest Samurai_Goat Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Hey, as long as you're talking about Michaels, it should be known that Gamengiri2002 has seen Shawn Michaels' bare nuts. So, go on, ask him about it.
Guest cynicalprofit Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Posing and being naked are 2 different things. Shawn "Posed" in playgirl but showed nothing. What the hell is the point if they aren't going to be showing skin? They could just have her pose in Raw magazine if she's not going to be naked in it. Then they'd get all of the profits. But only a portion of people who watch wrestling buy raw, Im willing to bet alot more people read playboy then those who read raw magizine. Its just publicity for the WWF.
Guest AndrewTS Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Posing and being naked are 2 different things. Shawn "Posed" in playgirl but showed nothing. What the hell is the point if they aren't going to be showing skin? They could just have her pose in Raw magazine if she's not going to be naked in it. Then they'd get all of the profits. But only a portion of people who watch wrestling buy raw, Im willing to bet alot more people read playboy then those who read raw magizine. Its just publicity for the WWF. Okay, good point, but I know I won't bother buying it if she's not showing anything off, since I could get the same stuff for free or just pull out the Divas mag I already have.
Guest Downhome Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Mmmm.....naked Trish should be next. I still think a "Nude WWE Divas" issue would sell a lot. It would be the highest selling issue of all time, there isn't a doubt in my mind. I'd rather see Victoria though, or even Steph.
Guest cynicalprofit Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Posing and being naked are 2 different things. Shawn "Posed" in playgirl but showed nothing. What the hell is the point if they aren't going to be showing skin? They could just have her pose in Raw magazine if she's not going to be naked in it. Then they'd get all of the profits. But only a portion of people who watch wrestling buy raw, Im willing to bet alot more people read playboy then those who read raw magizine. Its just publicity for the WWF. Okay, good point, but I know I won't bother buying it if she's not showing anything off, since I could get the same stuff for free or just pull out the Divas mag I already have. I wouldnt buy it either way, Ive got internet, it'll be on there days before its in print. As for steph naked, HELL YEAH.
Guest NoSelfWorth Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Naked Steph ? Playboy can't handle that much silicone.
Guest CanadianChick Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Naked Steph ? Playboy can't handle that much silicone. They had Chyna and Sable already...they can handle anything after those two.
Guest D'Lo White Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Naked Steph ? Playboy can't handle that much silicone. They had Chyna and Sable already...they can handle anything after those two. Yes, and Chyna had no boobs to begin with. Steph had pretty big natural boobs, so I think Chyna has much more silicone in her then Steph.
Guest cynicalprofit Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 They can airbrush out the scars, im sure they've done it before.
Guest HartFan86 Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 How about Trish and Steph together? A lesbian shoot with both of them would be......... *slaps head* I'm a such a freak.
Guest starvenger Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Wait? Playboy? Aw crap--sunsets, airbrushing and no snatch. Apparently you haven't "read" a Playboy recently...
Guest bob_barron Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Whose this Dive girl?? She in OVW?
Guest Polish_Rifle Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Whose this Dive girl?? She in OVW?
Guest AndrewTS Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Wait? Playboy? Aw crap--sunsets, airbrushing and no snatch. Apparently you haven't "read" a Playboy recently... Nope--did they change a bit? I refuse to believe they stopped airbrushing, though.
Guest starvenger Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Wait? Playboy? Aw crap--sunsets, airbrushing and no snatch. Apparently you haven't "read" a Playboy recently... Nope--did they change a bit? I refuse to believe they stopped airbrushing, though. Don't worry, the airbrushing is still there, but they do show of pink now. We're not talking Club or Swank-level porn, but it's a decent amount. ...hey, isn't this the wrestling folder?
Guest NoCalMike Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Speaking on this topic, is anyone buying into the idea that Stacy is doing an injury angle, so she can take a few weeks off to get breast implants?? Oh and about Steph, she said her natural breast-size was fine, but when she slimmed down, it made her excessive "baggage" on her chest all saggy, so she wanted them fixed more than stuffed. I guess.......
Guest geniusMoment Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Who cares I can go buy a playboy now with pictures of plenty of chicks just as hot or hotter then torrie. Why would I buy it just because she is affiliated with wrestling.
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Oh and about Steph, she said her natural breast-size was fine, but when she slimmed down, it made her excessive "baggage" on her chest all saggy, so she wanted them fixed more than stuffed. I guess....... Wait a minute..when did Steph lose weight?
Guest Polish_Rifle Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Steph has gotten very chucky lately. Maybe she's misusing HHH's roids.
Guest phoenixrising Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 In interviews I've seen with Stacy (including the last Divas magazine), she's always harping on her breasts. She believes they're too small and she would always say that she wanted them a little bigger. When she got laid out the first thought in my head was "Guess she's getting that boob job now". I just hope she doesn't go to Steph-like levels. As for Steph, I believe she slimmed down when she started wrestling, but I'm not sure.
Guest Mole Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 What phoniex? I heard the complete opposite, and Stacy saying that she is proud that WWE isn't asking her to get a boob job. She likes to think that her strong point is her legs, not her boobs. What article did you read that in? Was it Wrestlinginc.com? Fellas, I wouldn't be too caught up in Torrie posing for Playboy. If the news doesn't come from WO, Torch, or 1wrestling, I wouldn't count on it. I'd have to see it on either of those sites before I believe anything. Well if it is true, I'd LOVE to see her naked. I doubt she will 'pose' for Playboy if she wasn't naked. I bet Kidman will have a problem with it. If he had a problem with the lesbian bit with Dawn, he'll have a problem with this. I'd LOVE to see Steff pose though. I bet she will do it sometime in the future, she is hot. However, she would have to work on her stomach. Last time I saw her without her shirt on, she had a little love handles. But that was as while ago, so.
Guest The Tino Standard Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Torrie Wilson rumored to be posing in Playboy? Wow, what perfect timing for me to get the Playboy "12 issues for 12 bucks" offer in the mail. Count me in and giddy up!
Guest Jobber of the Week Posted January 23, 2003 Report Posted January 23, 2003 Er... I've heard that Torrie has said quite explicitly that she doesn't want to go nude at all, and that Trish considered it and decided that "it's been done." So this is right out left field.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now