Who are the 5 worst performers in WWE?

[Guest Redhawk]

This would not only include bad or bland in-ring work, but boring personalities, weak promos, or in general bringing nothing to the table. My list, not in order:

 

1. Bill DeMott

2. Bradshaw

3. Bossman

4. Mark Henry

5. Chuck Palumbo

[Guest Anglesault]

Test is obviously number one. If Eddy is the total package, Test is the empty package.

[Guest Angle-plex]

Test

Test

Test

Test

Test

[Guest DarthLordOfWrestling]

I think the listed are the worst people in the buisness.

 

 

1.Triple H

2. bill Demott

3. Bubba Dudley

4. Hulk Hogan

5. Test

[Guest D'Lo White]

I would like to add Bob Holly and Rikishi.

[Guest Bling-Bling Buchanan]

1. Johnny Stamboli

2. Jamal

3. Rosey

4. Test

5. Chuck Palumbo

[Mecha Mummy 0]

Not In Any Particular Order... (Caps Are Fun)

 

Big Show

Rosey

Test

Henry

Hogan

[Guest Kahran Ramsus]

1. Scott Steiner

2. Shawn Michaels

3. Test

4. Jeff Hardy

5. Three Minute Warning

[Guest JMTapes]

Rikishi(give me a break. Enough already.)

Batista (I don't care about potential, he doesn't entertain me.)

Jamal & Rosey (as Keith would say, "just so bad")

Trish Stratus(does nothing for me. The whole "sassy diva" thing is played out.)

Jeff Hardy (been doing the same match for 3 years)

 

www.jmtapes.com (very bland)

[Mecha Mummy 0]

... Michaels? Granted, he isn't good, but he's miles ahead of Big Show, Henry, and Hulk Hogan. Oh, and I forgot about Steiner. Okay, Big Show is spared.

[Guest Angle-plex]

... Michaels? Granted, he isn't good, but he's miles ahead of Big Show, Henry, and Hulk Hogan.

I'm pretty sure more people are entertained by Hogan than Michaels.

[Guest Kahran Ramsus]

Hogan is entertaining enough as long as he isn't overpushed. Michaels is horrible and has no business being in the company.

 

I didn't count Henry because he hasn't been around for so long. Same with Kevin Nash. Nash will be number one on the list when he comes back.

[Mecha Mummy 0]

That's more pertaining to overness than actual wrestling talent.

[Guest candie45]

Okay...

 

- DeMott

- Mark Henry

- Batista - has he even said a word yet? He's scary looking... so?

- 3MW

- Steiner

[Guest Kahran Ramsus]

This is about entertainment. Hogan is far more entertaining than HBK is. HBK was never that entertaining. It was his wrestling that made him fun to watch. Now that he doesn't have that, he has nothing. What made Hogan popular is still there, even if his body can't keep up.

[Guest notJames]

The Cat

Terri Runnels

HBK

Bill DeMott

Jonathan Coachman

 

If Nash were active, he'd be numbers 1-10.

[Guest evilhomer]

1. Albert - his annoying grunting makes his matches even worse than just watching them

 

2. 3MW - they had a good thing going when they were Bishoff's hencemen, but actually seeing them in the ring ruined them

 

3. Mark Henry - this has been a long ten years, and still 3 to go

 

4. Maven - maybe because I didn't watch tough enough, I don't feel anything for the guy. He brings a nice drop kick and a green rookie learning on the job, I don't think I've enjoyed a thing I've seen from him (except for his celebration after drop kicking Taker at the Rumble)

 

5. Chuck Palumbo - just shows no charisma at all

 

(dis) Honorable Mention:

 

(the late) Al Wilson

 

Chief Morley - not Val Venis or Sean Morley - CHIEF MORLEY, he's been dull and predictable, which is a shame for someone with the talent he has

 

 

Just a note: While I dislike Rikishi, Hogan and Michaels, I wouldn't list them because they do still have a great deal of popularity with the fans (and the question was worst performers).

[Mecha Mummy 0]

Ohhh. My apologies. If it's all around, my "top" five are...

 

Test - Bland worker, can't act, stupid gimmick. The fans don't like him, they like Stacy.

 

Bill DeMott - Did some humorous (No pun intended) things on Tough Enough, but the whole "INTENSE ANGRY BADASS" thing is dull.

 

Three Minute Warning, ESPECIALLY Rosey - Slow, sloppy, dull. Rico can't save these guys and why he's even managing them I'll never know.

 

Spike Dudley - I don't care if he bumps, his offense REALLY sucks, he can't cut a promo, and he's just bland.

 

Mark Henry - Go away. Please. Oh, wait, we haven't seen you since October. And THAT is a good thing.

[Guest Brian]

Test has to be the bottom of the pit. Steiner and Trips can be midly entertaining at times, but Test is just horrible.

[Guest BoboBrazil]

Test

Albert

3 minute warning(do tag teams count as 2 or 1?)

Regal

Spike Dudley

Rikishi

Bob Holly

Billy Kidman

Chuck Palumbo

 

It is more than five, but oh well.

[Guest subliminal_animal]

That's more pertaining to overness than actual wrestling talent

I don't really remember what you were referring to, but if someone is over, they must doing something right, regardless of if you or me doesn't like it.

 

Each of these guys brings something to the table, as there is not one wrestler in the WWE who brings ABSOLUTELY nothing to the table, but to me, they bring very little:

 

Palumbo

Spike

Bubba

D-Von

Storm

 

Honorable mentions to Regal, Kidman and Rikishi.

 

Charlie Haas is getting on my nerves, but he hasn't been around long enough.

 

I don't agree with Albert, Test, Henry, Hogan, DeMott, Maven and Stamboli, among those that were mentioned a couple times.

[Guest Banky]

Albert

Rikishi

Lita

Batista

Sean Morley

[Guest Justwitty]

In no particular order...

 

Johnny Stamboli - Since Justin Credible was fired, he takes over the spot for most useless wrestler on the roster. There is just nothing I have seen from him that separates him from dozens of other "minor league" wrestlers.

 

Chuck Palumbo - Pretty bland as a singles wrestler, no real personality since the Billy and Chuck angle.

 

Bill DeMott - Bland, bland, BLAND!

 

Test - I personally think he's one of the better big men as a worker but this is about total character value in entertaining. It's not his ring work that puts him here, it's his crappy acting skills.

 

Crash Holly - I think everyone here will disagree with me on this one but his character has been stale once he left his 24/7 gimmick back in 2000 and I find him the least entertaining of the cruisers. Total opinion choice here.

 

The problem with the guys I listed isn't that they are bad because that can be entertaining in its own way (See Scott Steiner, Royal Rumble 2003) just stale. And in the world of professional wrestling, that is the absolute worst thing one can "achieve."

[Guest AM The Kid]

Lita

Bob Holly

Rosie

Jamal

Rikishi

Albert

...this could go on and on

[Guest netslob]

1.Torrie Wilson--cannot act to save her fucking life.

 

2.Dawn Marie--ditto

 

3. Kidman--blandest white boy this side of Greg Brady

 

4. Batista--shoulda kept the Leviathan look and gimmick.

 

5. Scott Steiner--promos make Mike Tyson sound intellectual by comparison.

[Guest KingOfOldSchool]

Lita

Palumbo

Test

Regal

Jeff Hardy

Mark Henry

Bob Holly

Steiner

Bradshaw

DeMott

 

Yeah, 10 names... I couldn't nail it down to just 5.

[Guest cabbageboy]

1. Albert. Test may be slightly boring but he at least isn't revolting to watch.

 

2. Bill DeMott. I mean it's fucking Hugh Morrus for god's sake.

 

3. 3MW. Fat...Samoans...bleh. Seriously, these guys should be Rico's bodyguards, not Rico managing them.

 

4. Regal and Storm. I will get flamed for this one, but my god these guys are boring. They have the antithesis of heat.

 

5. Michaels. Give it up Shawn, no one cares about you anymore.

[Guest teke184]

1. Triple H

2. A-Train

3. Billy Kidman

4. Bill DeMott

5. Bikertaker (at least the Dead Man gimmick has campy goodness)

[Guest Celtic Jobber]

1. 3 Minute Warning

2. Rikishi

3. Scott Steiner

4. A-Train

5. Big Show

 

(Dis)Honorable Mentions: HHH, Test, Bill DeMott, Batista, Jeff Hardy, D-Lo Brown, Kane, Undertaker.

 

Future Contender: Goldberg

[Guest BoboBrazil]

Goldberg's matches were always pretty entertaining in WCW. He would always bust out new moves and submission holds and he had good charisma.