Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Vern Gagne

Yankees 2003 Payroll

Recommended Posts

Guest Vern Gagne

http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/2003/0203/1503295.html

 

So much for the new Collective Bargaining Agreement forcing the New York Yankees to curtail their spending.

 

 

Despite the implementation of a luxury tax, George Steinbrenner has reached even deeper into his pockets to pay players.

 

 

Owner George Steinbrenner stopping at nothing to improve the Yankees, and sources familiar with their books told the New York Daily News last week that the team's current payroll for 2003 is an all-time high of $164 million -- about $24 million more than at this time a year ago.

 

That's $45 million more than the second highest, the Mets' $119 million, according to figures obtained by the newspaper.

 

New York's payroll also is almost 60 percent greater than the division rival Boston Red Sox, who are sixth highest in the majors at $103 million. The size of the Yankees' payroll compared to baseball's other 29 franchises was a major reason the CBA includes the so-called "luxury tax," which is geared to increase competitive balance by discouraging overspending.

 

Both New York teams will try to shed some salary before the season begins, according to the Daily News, but if their payroll levels remain where they are, they will be the only two teams in baseball forced to pay a luxury tax.

 

According to the Collective Bargaining Agreement, any team with a 2003 payroll number exceeding the "threshold" of $117 million would pay 17.5 percent on the excess. As they stand now, the Mets would have to pay about $350,000 and the Yankees $8 million to $9 million.

 

And every time a team exceeds the luxury tax threshold, its tax rate rises.

 

"Winning and appealing to fans is where the money is," Yankees chief operating officer Lonn Trost told the Daily News. "We also are growing the next generation of fan with our approach."

 

In the days after a surprising first-round playoff loss to the Angels, Yankees executives sounded as if they were working for other small-market clubs. They vowed to cut salary and general manager Brian Cashman even said the club's payroll wouldn't have to match the $140 million they had tied up at the start of last season.

 

"You don't have to spend that kind of money to win," Cashman said at the time.

 

When Cashman couldn't find takers for overpriced players Rondell White (due $5 million in 2003), Raul Mondesi ($7 million) and Sterling Hitchcock ($6 million) and Matsui and Contreras became available, the team decided it could not do without the latter two. Matsui was signed for $21 million over three years, Contreras for $32 million over four years.

 

"What we see with the Yankees is that there has been no change in priorities," a baseball official told the Daily News. "Certainly they talked about cutting payroll and ... there's no disputing they made an effort to. It was probably always their plan."

 

If the Yankees were to trade either Mondesi, White of Hitchcock in the coming weeks, it would not only reduce the payroll but also their luxury tax number.

 

"But they still believe the best way to make money is to put fans in the seats with a winner on the field," the baseball official said. "There are things in place that would deter most teams from spending, but these guys won't let it compromise their first priority."

 

According to the Daily News, the $164 million figure includes benefits but not performance incentives, which cost the Yankees an additional $4 million last season (mostly to left-hander David Wells). That figure also is greater than any other franchise's.

 

Agents point to this component of the Collective Bargaining Agreement, as well as the increased revenue-sharing plan, as "market shapers." Only a handful of free agents found themselves signing this offseason for what they wanted, which has fueled the current talk about collusion by owners.

 

"Really, how can you compete when somebody is spending 80 or 90 million more?" Hall of Famer George Brett told the Kansas City Star. "The only thing you can do is catch lightning in a bottle like Oakland or Minnesota. (The Royals) haven't caught lightning in a bottle."

 

Brett was part of a group that made an unsuccessful attempt to buy the Royals, who he played 21 seasons for before retiring in 1993, after founding owner Ewing Kauffman's death.

 

"I can't see myself staying in Kansas City as a player," Brett said. "Not now. It's all changed. I would sign one-year contracts."

 

 

Alot of that is going to unproven and mediocre underachieving players. So much for the Yankees of '98 with in- grown talent, and players they picked up for bargain prices like O'Neill, and Brosius.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest starvenger

The Yankees had to know that they were screwed for 2003 wrt the luxury tax. All the stuff about cutting costs for 2003 was pure BS - noone else is gonna pay $7-10 mil for some of the NY players. So they did the realistic thing and are eating the tax penalty for 2003, knowing that for 2004 they can cut salaries of 3-4 of their starting pitchers and probably some of the "role players" as well.

 

Of course, in 2004 they'll probably do the same thing and everyone will hate the Yankees even more...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vern Gagne

That's a good point Starvenger. The article does mention they tried to shop Mondesi and White, but big shock no one wanted them.

 

What is status of David Wells after this year. Clemens won't be back, and might even retire is the other 40 something starter signed through 2004.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest starvenger
The yankees are the gheyest team in professional sport.

What, did Piazza get traded there when I wasn't looking? :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Man in Blak

So...anyone want to call the year when the Yankee's luxury tax penalty will be higher than another team's entire payroll?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest NoCalMike

Ya know that is why I cut the Atlanta Braves some slack as far as the money issue goes. Yes they have a high salary as well, but a lot of their talent is homegrown, or they lock down a player they REALLY NEED. The Yankees go after players that will automatically sit on the bench just so a rival or another contending team cannot better themselves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DrTom

Bah, I've stopped caring about baseball salaries. If Steinbrenner wants to spend gobs of money, knowing he has a hefty luxury tax check to write, let him. I have a much smaller problem with that than I do with a jackass like David Glass who cries poverty all the time, then pockets the revenue-sharing money he gets without improving his team or increasing his payroll.

 

Besides, the A's and Twins have shown you don't need a ridiculous payroll to win. You need good scouting, shrewd drafting, and an organizational commitment to winning at every level. Clubs like the Royals will never adopt something like that because it's too difficult.

 

The Angels last year showed the Yankees were vulnerable to teams that put the ball in play a lot. Their defense just isn't very good, and their offense works best when it can just bash the ball over the fence. It doesn't look like they've changed significantly, so I'd look for them to be ripe for the picking this year, too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vern Gagne

I agree Tom.

 

The Yankees can spend has much as they want. I think it's being spent unwisely, but hey it gives the Twins a better chance to win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest NoCalMike

Well the A's have Billy Beane. The best GM in possibly all of sports right now. The key to the A's success was the ability of the owners to lock up all the young players to long term contracts when they were first or second year players, but when those contracts are up and they hit their PRIME, you can bet they are out of Oakland. Then I will cry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Vern Gagne

NCM: How does the A's farm system look? The Twins have one of the best farm systems in Baseball, and have done a good job locking up players like Hunter, Jones, and Guzman. I'd like to see the A's keep there talent and start a non-divisional rivalry with Minnesota. They really had some great games last year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×